Posted on | January 26, 2011 | 6 Comments
Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 5:23 PM
Press Release
Request Filed for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
When access is permitted to the paper court files – no signed judicial records can be found in there; access to the electronic court files is entirely denied; false and contradictory dockets, journals, orders lists are published online, but no valid, signed orders or decisions; no signed judicial records are served with notices of the Court; letters of denial are issued unsigned, signed by unauthorized staff, or signed in a false manner. The office of Clerk of the Court William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States, and which one were not. The Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States undermines the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of all in the United States.
Los Angeles, January 25 –Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alllert (NGO)) has filed a request with the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the House Rules Committee for impeachment of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court for violations of his Oath of Office.
Third party declarations regarding repeated failed attempts to discover any valid judicial records in the paper court files, and entire denial of access to the electronic records of the Court, as well as records, which were served by the office of Clerk William Suter on petitioners and applicants, have been provided as the core evidence for the request.
The request alleges that the office of Clerk William Suter routinely violates the First Amendment right to inspect and to copy court records and the Due Process right for notice and service.
The request alleges that Clerk William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Court, and which ones were not. Such conduct renders judicial proceedings of the highest court of the land vague and ambiguous.
The conduct of Clerk William Suter should be considered of the highest public policy significance, because of the nature of the cases that are listed in the request, petitions and applications for the protection of their rights against alleged abuse by government and by large corporations. Some of the cases, ranging from 2007 to 2011, also pertain to matters, which are noted in the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations as “corruption of the courts•€ï¿½ [2½ [2] and denial of the right for Habeas Corpus in the United States. [3]
The conduct of Clerk William Suter is alleged in the request as violation of his Oath of Office, and violation of his duties and obligations pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789, including, but not limited to: denial of Access to Justice, denial of Equal Protection, Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, and/or Misprision of Felonies; therefore – impeachable offences.
Additional measures are proposed in the request for restoring the integrity of the offices of the clerks of the US courts. The US Congress enacted laws, presidential directives were issued, regulations were promulgated, and systems were implemented for authentication and validation of e-government in the Executive Branch. In contrast, the US courts implemented electronic court systems and electronic court records with no legal foundation. Therefore, the request also urges the US Congress to enact federal rules of electronic courts.
Regardless, the request notes that no measure can substitute for vigilance of the public at large, and computing professionals in particular, in “keeping a watchful eyeâ€Ã€ï¿½ on the the courts.
Notice was given to the United Nations Human Rights Council, in view of the pending final vote on the 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations.
Comments
January 26th, 2011 @ 1:16 pm
Is there any way for you to directly sue this William Suter in District or State court?
Also, you should file criminal charges against him with the Congressional Police Service.
January 26th, 2011 @ 1:58 pm
Another loonie, barking at the moon. Hopefully Mr. Zernik will not hold his breath waiting for a response to his request.
January 26th, 2011 @ 6:12 pm
UCCP+V&CL – General Suter and his staff have been doing an excellent job managing the Court’s docket since he was appointed by President Bush in 1991. Mr Zernik is a lunatic who likes to pretend he’s a lawyer. There will be no lawsuit, there will be no criminal charges, at least not against the General.
January 26th, 2011 @ 10:40 pm
Surely he can be sued for his misprision of felony for aiding and abetting this massive fraud and treason that’s been usurped by the anointed one.
January 26th, 2011 @ 11:29 pm
Another Loonie? I must count for at least 8 to 10 “Loonies” Would like to know John’s Age & Background. Mine is 77. Ex AF Pilot – Lived & worked in Saudi Arabia 1973-1977 4 full years. Met King Faisal (no, I did not bow to him)-on my Birthday 1973 – Two weeks later Egypt attacked & started the “yom kippur” war. Ever been behind the Iron Curtain John? Ever been shot at as an unarmed Civilan John? You don’t have any idea how Precious Freedom Is!
January 27th, 2011 @ 12:19 pm
Thank you for your service Bill. Some of these Liberals with limp wrists have no idea of sacrifice.