OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

If the court does not adress Obama eligibility, there will be civil unrest

Posted on | October 29, 2009 | 12 Comments

Jack

We’ve crossed a very critical juncture in the Obama eligibility cases — very critical in terms of timing. I believe Judge Carter knows this.

Until now (or very recently, say last week or two) any court taking action vis a vis Obama eligibility would have seriously risked (let’s use the term for want of a better one) “riots in the streets” by some portion of the population, certainly civil unrest by segments of the population. As of now, the reverse is true, were the Carter court NOT to address the Obama eligibility case, the risk of, if not outright “riots in the street”, certainly substantial civil unrest is manifest by OTHER large segments of the population.

Perhaps this waiting for the day of reckoning was worth the while, noting the cost with each day of delay in terms of destruction of our national economy and defense, but again maybe a necessary cost to reach this point in time where the majority of popular support is in favor of definite court action against Obama.
0 #
Category: Letters from Readers and Patriots

Comments

12 Responses to “If the court does not adress Obama eligibility, there will be civil unrest”

  1. kenneth
    October 29th, 2009 @ 1:32 pm

    If the courts will not take action for an unlawful situation, the elected officials will not take action for an unlawful situation, the justice department will not take action against an unlawful situation, the state governments will not take action against an unlawful situation, the state attorney generals will not take action against an unlawful situation what recourse is left to the citizens??
    If all the above do not enforce the law why should the American citizens FOLLOW the law and stay peaceful?

  2. sick of corruption
    October 29th, 2009 @ 2:07 pm

    I agree but it should not be seen as action against as much as action to JUST OPEN DISCOVERY THIS WILL reveal TRUTH AND EVIDENCE WELL.. THE REST TAKES CARE OF ITSELF…

  3. Don Lovvo
    October 29th, 2009 @ 2:26 pm

    “Carter Caves

    “Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 29, 2009”

    It looks like the Judge has been had. He granted the motion to dismiss the suit against Obama, stating that over 69 million people wanted the Obamamessiah and he wouldn’t overthrow him. In saying so, he is also saying that The Constitution is no longer in effect — and he used a bogus Constitutional argument to do it.

    “Plaintiffs request asking this Court to sweep away the votes of over sixty-nine million Americans with the stroke of a pen and order a new election during which the country would be in a state of turmoil, ignores the Constitution’s processes and separation of powers that were developed by the founders.”

    What Carter said:

    • It’s OK to ignore Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution.

    • Votes trump the U. S. Constitution.

    • The U. S. Constitution does not allow the judicial branch to interfere in a coup d’etat.

    The fix was in. Velamoor probably brought Judge Carter’s ruling with him from Perkins Coie.”

    What do we do now????

  4. Harry H
    October 29th, 2009 @ 2:39 pm

    Let’s face it, many people don’t want to examine Obuma’s election fraud precisely because they fear that black power a la ACORN and their socialist/communist friends will take violent form. But part of the Obuma fraud is that he is not African-American at all.

    When American blacks realize that Obuma has not one drop of African-American blood and shares nothing of African-American heritage, they will not be so ready to defend a foreign fraud and imposter. Instead, if their allegiance is really to this nation, they will support the Constitution under which they enjoy equal protection of the law and all the benefits of a free society.

  5. Lisa
    October 29th, 2009 @ 3:10 pm

    After I read, who is the new clerk of Judge Carter, I knew what will hapen. Sad, America is sold out from the SCOTUS down to ACORN. You are sure, this is AMERIA or Zimbabve ??? I can’t make a difference, can you?

  6. Harry H
    October 29th, 2009 @ 3:47 pm

    I read elsewhere that Carter has caved and dismissed the case. What a travesty that he embraces mob rule in deciding not to allow the Constitution to be considered. If the rules are followed, we are just in the jungle here, where might makes right.

    So the fight goes on–in the courts for now, since Orly will surely appeal. Maybe she will also go directly to the D.C. court since Holder has sat on her quo warranto application for so long. It ain’t over till Obuma is gone.

  7. elizabeth wilson
    October 29th, 2009 @ 4:33 pm

    I just heard on Fox News Orange County Court
    dismissed the case on grounds of “jurisdication”
    and the voters put him in office. Is it true?

  8. John
    October 29th, 2009 @ 6:57 pm

    well let the unrest begin cause Carter accepted the dismiss

  9. Steph
    October 29th, 2009 @ 7:20 pm

    The courts have shown where their allegiances lie. How much more can we take? Can we make it to 2010? Today’s news regarding dismissal has been no less than a slap in the face to the freedom fighters who created the Constitution. In a symbolic gesture, these judges have “burned” the papers that contain the words so meticulously and diligently crafted by our founders.

    A penetrating evil has befallen our nation.

    “He who is void of virtuous attachments in private life is, or very soon will be, void of all regard for his country. There is seldom an instance of a man guilty of betraying his country, who had not before lost the feeling of moral obligations in his private connections.” Samuel Adams

  10. old1
    October 29th, 2009 @ 11:41 pm

    The darkest hour is always just before dawn.

  11. kw
    October 30th, 2009 @ 3:19 am

    There is no justice as per stare decisis. The men and women in robes don’t adhere to the law. The Carter decision for the defendant is another example of just how overtly corrupt the government has become and is why most of the populace is disdainful of the courts and of attorneys in general. Jury duty, anyone?

    Dr. Taitz and her plaintiffs, however, from out of the darkness have emerged to bear the weight of the good fight against evil, and that evil shall be overcome. Evil never just gives in and goes away. So, as members of the good fight, we must all be at the ready and be prepared for what must be done.

  12. RPM
    November 1st, 2009 @ 8:17 pm

    It’s time that the people come together in the name of justice and freedom to remove the usurpers of our basic laws and liberties. Those who have sworn to uphold our constitution must be held accountable, and every person; democrat, republican or independent who is ignoring their duty under the law regarding our highest office MUST be impeached and removed from office. Someone should start a list of every person that has aided in any deception in this matter and these people should be held to task; lawsuits brought against them and have them removed from office or position, whatever it may be; clerk or elected official. To topple such an elevated vertical structure, you have to destabilize it from the lower floors. What good is it to remove just the top people or person when the entire balance of the organization remains intact? You need to take it apart piece by piece, starting at the bottom.