Posted on | October 29, 2009 | 3 Comments
Bill Angles |
Submitted on 2009/10/28 at 12:40pm
I read the transcript of Oct 5 and it appeared that Judge Carter was trying to get to a point where he could give “standing”. His questions to the defendents were very interesting…kind of indicated he was fishing and not all together satisfied with their answers. He’s a sly fox, so let’s not write him off yet. He certainly knows how important this case is to the welfare of the U.S. and the Constitution. I think he has more than the guts necessary to decide this case. Though he seemed, at times, to get a little riled with Dr Taitz, he certainly must have admired her fighting spirit kicking out through her verbosity. Orly, you are like a tigeress fighting for her cubs. Perhaps Judge Carter will give partial |
Comments
3 Responses to “”
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:27 am
I hope Dr. Taitz is aware of the filed vs. accepted work of the bloggers at Miss Tickly blog. The Obama File now has it posted. It may be something you can drag into court.PLease check it out.
October 29th, 2009 @ 10:33 am
We’ve crossed a very critical juncture in the Obama eligibility cases — very critical in terms of timing. I believe Judge Carter knows this.
Until now (or very recently, say last week or two) any court taking action vis a vis Obama eligibility would have seriously risked (let’s use the term for want of a better one) “riots in the streets” by some portion of the population, certainly civil unrest by segments of the population. As of now, the reverse is true, were the Carter court NOT to address the Obama eligibility case, the risk of, if not outright “riots in the street”, certainly substantial civil unrest is manifest by OTHER large segments of the population.
Perhaps this waiting for the day of reckoning was worth the while, noting the cost with each day of delay in terms of destruction of our national economy and defense, but again maybe a necessary cost to reach this point in time where the majority of popular support is in favor of definite court action against Obama.
October 30th, 2009 @ 4:33 pm
How naive I was. I thought Carter was up to it.
He should be replaced with someone who has the character and principles necessary to do the right thing. This “standing” thing is not constitutional; just used as an excuse to not uphold the law. Maybe everyone should not pay any more taxes until they are given STANDING!
Or, better yet, let’s fire the whole bunch in D.C. and get responsible representation. Start on Nov 2010–elect a whole new crew.