OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Court to decide on US government lying on missing records

Posted on | February 19, 2014 | 13 Comments

Orly Taitz 
Orly Taitz uploaded a video

Court to decide on US government lying on missing records

  • 17 minutes ago
Motion for summary judgment filed by Attorney Orly Taitz in a case dealing with missing records in relation to Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

13 Responses to “Court to decide on US government lying on missing records”

  1. Rod Riddle
    February 19th, 2014 @ 6:00 pm

    Once again I am just an old fashioned common sense guy here so I guess I need an explanation. The SSA already admitted in an earlier case that they had the Harry Bounel records but were playing the privacy game in direct violation of their own 120 yr rule. So, my common sense question is what is there for the court to decide on? The court knows the record exists due to the previous case and they know of the SSA’s own 120 yr rule which gives the public access to the records. Can someone help me to better understand this?

  2. EqualjusticeI
    February 19th, 2014 @ 6:51 pm

    Dr.taitz,
    You are the true Lady Liberty. Awaiting to find a honest judge, just ONE!
    You have more spine than all congress and Scotus together!

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 20th, 2014 @ 4:35 am

    we’ll see what the judge says

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 20th, 2014 @ 4:35 am

    thank you

  5. Mark
    February 20th, 2014 @ 3:01 pm

    Unfortunately, I do not think the court will rule in your favor, as much as I would love for them to. However, IF they did rule in your favor, what then would happen?

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 20th, 2014 @ 3:17 pm

    Mark, you are a known Obama supporter, clearly you want the court to rule in his favor

  7. Mark
    February 20th, 2014 @ 6:13 pm

    I’m a known Obama supporter?!?!? PLEASE enlighten me as to where you got that idea. At the risk of sounding crass, nothing could be further from the truth! I can not stand the man! NEVER HAVE. I was raised by a retired Naval Officer (step-father) and retired Sheriff’s Deputy. Every male in my family has served in the military, with my younger brother being deployed 3 times. I am an ardent supporter of our military AND Constitution. The mere fact that I feel I have to defend my beliefs to someone who has no inkling who I am, or what I believe irritates me. Not to mention, being called a supporter of that “man” (again not sinking to the left level of name calling) actually pisses me right off. ANYWAY, again, my question was my question, if you read it, was actually asking what our limp wrist government will do if the courts rule in your favor. I am a little confused as to what would happen should they rule in your favor. Oh, and please, by all means, feel free to email me and I will direct you to my personal page, where you can look through a history going back since it was announced that he was running and you will see that I CAN NOT stand that man…

  8. Rod Riddle
    February 20th, 2014 @ 9:51 pm

    Mark, you think the Judge will not rule in Dr Taitz’ favor based upon what? Read my previous post and give us rationale as to why you think the Judge won’t abide by the law and grant Dr Taitz access to the records.

  9. Mark
    February 21st, 2014 @ 6:40 am

    In cases like these, such as the lawsuits regarding his eligibility, how many times have the judges actually followed law?

  10. Mark
    February 21st, 2014 @ 7:46 am

    AND my original question stands, as NOT ONE judge has held Obama accountable for anything he’s done wrong, and the list of his wrongdoings is how high? In all the proven wrongdoings, some of which Americans have literally died for, when has ANYONE actually held him accountable, and what will they do?

  11. Karl
    February 21st, 2014 @ 8:27 am

    “In cases like these, such as the lawsuits regarding his eligibility, how many times have the judges actually followed law?”

    You did not answer Rod’s question. The issue is not how many times other judges actually followed law, but whether this judge has the personal honor and integrity to honor her solemn oath to uphold and follow the rule of law. We pray that she does.

  12. Mark
    February 21st, 2014 @ 12:38 pm

    After speaking with you on the phone this morning, and expressing my displeasure in being termed a “known obama supporter,” you informed me that you would remove that statement. As of yet, my response to that comment is still “awaiting moderation” and yet, the accusation of being a supporter of that man is still there…

  13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    February 21st, 2014 @ 1:00 pm

    I do not know where the statement is.
    If you are not an Obama supporter, that is good, I am happy to hear that, so maybe you can support my work by donating

Leave a Reply