Medal of honor
Posted on | May 20, 2009 | 3 Comments
I got this e-mail. I don’t advocate any overthrow of government. What I would advocate is a subpoena for Obama’s records. There was a legislature passed by Congress in 2005. It is called Stolen Honor. One can be prosecuted for lying in regads to medal of honor. Since this medal ids given by the president, and if he is lying about his qualification to be the president, he cna be prosecuted. I talked to one JAG of the Charter, he signed the subpoena for the docs, he was supposed to forward them to me, but it looks like someone found out about it and threatened him and he got cold feet and changed his mind. If there is one JAG of the charter of Medal of Honor, who does not have cold feet and would sign the subpoena, call me 949-683-5411.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:23 AM
From:
This sender is DomainKeys verified
“Elaine Dohman”
To:
“Orly Taitz” <dr_taitz@yahoo.com>
|
This was posted on a chat site I’m on…Any chance this will help?
STARTING POINT: All of you Hero’s of America, Metal of Honor recipiants: you have first standing in both houses when you enter, Dawn your uniform and wear your metal, walk up to the podium and speak your peace. IT IS LAW AND YOUR RIGHT. We could effectivly overthrow the goverment with only 100 of our bravest soldiers who recieved the metal of Honor. Read about it.
THIS IS OLD SCHOOL PRACTICE: Metal of Honor winners: Soldiers who are Hero’s have first standing in both houses. This is your final duty call.
I HEREBY VOLLUNTEER TO HELP, ASSIST AND EDUCATE ANY WHO WANT TO TAKE A STAND. |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
3 Responses to “Medal of honor”












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

May 20th, 2009 @ 4:35 pm
So what is your strategy? If you have one, call me and let me know 949-683-5411
May 21st, 2009 @ 7:20 am
Here’s the text of Congress’ Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (S.1998)
S.1998
One Hundred Ninth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the third day of January, two thousand and six
An Act
To amend title 18, United States Code, to enhance protections relating to the reputation and meaning of the Medal of Honor and other military decorations and awards, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Stolen Valor Act of 2005′.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Fraudulent claims surrounding the receipt of the Medal of Honor, the distinguished-service cross, the Navy cross, the Air Force cross, the Purple Heart, and other decorations and medals awarded by the President or the Armed Forces of the United States damage the reputation and meaning of such decorations and medals.
(2) Federal law enforcement officers have limited ability to prosecute fraudulent claims of receipt of military decorations and medals.
(3) Legislative action is necessary to permit law enforcement officers to protect the reputation and meaning of military decorations and medals.
SEC. 3. ENHANCED PROTECTION OF MEANING OF MILITARY DECORATIONS AND MEDALS.
(a) Expansion of General Criminal Offense- Subsection (a) of section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `manufactures, or sells’ and inserting `purchases, attempts to purchase, solicits for purchase, mails, ships, imports, exports, produces blank certificates of receipt for, manufactures, sells, attempts to sell, advertises for sale, trades, barters, or exchanges for anything of value’.
(b) Establishment of Criminal Offense Relating to False Claims About Receipt of Decorations and Medals- Such section 704 is further amended–
(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
(b) False Claims About Receipt of Military Decorations or Medals- Whoever falsely represents himself or herself, verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States, any of the service medals or badges awarded to the members of such forces, the ribbon, button, or rosette of any such badge, decoration, or medal, or any colorable imitation of such item shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than six months, or both.’; and
(3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (c), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by inserting `or (b)’ after `subsection (a)’.
(c) Enhanced Penalty for Offenses Involving Certain Other Medals- Such section 704 is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(d) Enhanced Penalty for Offenses Involving Certain Other Medals- If a decoration or medal involved in an offense described in subsection (a) or (b) is a distinguished-service cross awarded under section 3742 of title 10, a Navy cross awarded under section 6242 of title 10, an Air Force cross awarded under section 8742 of section 10, a silver star awarded under section 3746, 6244, or 8746 of title 10, a Purple Heart awarded under section 1129 of title 10, or any replacement or duplicate medal for such medal as authorized by law, in lieu of the punishment provided in the applicable subsection, the offender shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.’.
(d) Conforming Amendments- Subsection (c) of such section 704, as so redesignated, is further amended–
(1) by inserting `Enhanced Penalty for Offenses Involving’ before `Congressional Medal of Honor’; and
(2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
(2) CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR DEFINED- In this subsection, the term `Congressional Medal of Honor’ means–
(A) a medal of honor awarded under section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of title 10 or section 491 of title 14;
(B) a duplicate medal of honor issued under section 3754, 6256, or 8754 of title 10 or section 504 of title 14; or
(C) a replacement of a medal of honor provided under section 3747, 6253, or 8747 of title 10 or section 501 of title 14.’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-1998
May 21st, 2009 @ 9:37 am
I did not have time to answer you yesterday, as I am out of town on business and it is hectic. I’m sure you know how that is.
I don’t know why my post was deleted, but your answer remains. I was merely supplying you with info regarding the topic. I thought that’s what you were seeking.
I have meetings with clients today and tomorrow, and when I return home I will be spending the holiday with the kids and grandkids. I will catch up on things in the office and if you are serious about me calling you, I will try to reach you on Tuesday.