OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Posted on | September 18, 2009 | 4 Comments

Blog entry today from – “I work for major news company”…

Friday, September 18, 2009 4:17 PM
From:
This sender is DomainKeys verified
redacted
To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
This is unverified, but it is a blog entry that was just posted today on RepubX:
 
“I work for a major news company, however, I am unaware of the canadafreepress story that you refer to. I am forced to use masked, out of country, anonymous internet proxies just to post this blog. I don’t know whose lives are at risk, I don’t know the names of all of the lawmakers involved in the case. I have only been given vague information and that information has nervously come in bits and pieces from several credible sources and one lawmaker. I do know that, according to my sources that, the Barack Obama presidency is in serious question. My original source has become sources, and now more people are talking. Most of the insiders in Washington, California and Texas will shape how this will play out with Carter, Orly and Keyes. The Rhodes case is a last resort, a southern court, a southern judge, and a military officer refusing to deploy is a problem. But if Obama has any hand in dismissal, it will be known, and the bribed will be sought. Keyes vs. Obama will be the case I can most assure you. You have to understand that even though most of the concerned citizens want the story to come out now, there are federal agencies, and sectors within those agencies, who thankfully are currently disconnected from control and influence of the White House, who’s work is not finished. Most conservative and even liberal journalist alike are very desperate for the story, many of them want it to save their own careers which they know are now in question. I am getting hints that this all plays out in late Oct. I do however; expect to see more Obama documents released in the next 30 days.”
 
Stay Tuned
 
 
 
Godspeed Orly
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

4 Responses to “”

  1. Bill
    September 18th, 2009 @ 7:41 pm

    There is already a case that brings this point of the President of the Senate’s failure to call for objections it is called Kercher et al v Obama et al.

    But in the Barnett Case, Judge Carter just held that discovery was available as to issues in the DOJ motion to dismiss. Since the DOJ has opened the door, Orly should walk right through it. The difference is that this case is not in a limited court ordered discovery phase. This post has nothing to do with breaking any story about Cheney’s failure to call for objections. That’s old news and not news that I broke or claim to have broken. This is simply about available discovery. (A quote from Leo Donofrio)

    This is what its all about, “failure of the government to follow its own procedures according to law.” Dick Cheney was “shooting straight” during the electorial count and aiming at the heart of the US Constitution. He didn’t miss. Now a FRAUD is president.

  2. Andrew Chavez
    September 18th, 2009 @ 7:52 pm

    Of course, we all hope that your comments are true, but then, we are going to have to wait for the results to prove themselves. The nightmare of watching the powers of the U.S. President being used to maintain a fake, fraud, usurper, and impostor is soul-withering. Surely, we are not that bad off as a nation. The recent town-hall meetings and the 12 Sep rally in Washington inspires hope in us all. I gain tremendous respect for the American people because they are reacting like a free people when properly informed.

  3. Bill
    September 18th, 2009 @ 7:55 pm

    LINE OF SUCCESSION IF OBAMA/SOETORO REMOVED FROM OFFICE (It reads like a comic book of corrupt thugs)

  4. jenny
    September 19th, 2009 @ 2:56 pm

    Orly,
    FYI:
    From Leos blog. Excuse it if already known, but leo has serious work done and since the defense has been using it, why not you. Your the best. Oh when site went down I sent your request to him and it posted right away.

    This is Barnett verses Obama.

    Point is you do have jursidition because Cheney failed.
    Please read his blog.

    The DOJ clipped the statute so as to leave out the part which places a burden on the Vice President, acting in his role as President of the Senate, to call for objections after the count of votes.

    Vice President Cheney failed to call for objections as the statute requires.

    (See the You Tube video of the 2009 electoral vote count at about the 27:00 minute mark.)

    The DOJ motion to dismiss relies upon separation of powers and the political question doctrine alleging the district court has no authority to entertain the case. In doing so, the DOJ cites specifically 3 U.S.C. § 15 as proof that challenges to the President’s eligibility are provided for by Congress.

    This is true, but those provisions were not properly followed on January 8, 2009 when the votes for Obama were counted. And the district court therefore does have jurisdiction to review a failure of the Government to follow the laws enacted to protect the integrity of the electoral process.it is the first on the blog

    With Judge Carter’s reasoning guiding my analysis, I carefully examined the DOJ motion to dismiss paying special attention to the arguments made starting on page 11. When I got to page 13, I found something interesting:

    Under 3 U.S.C. § 15, Congress is directed to be in session on the appropriate date to count the electoral votes for President, with the President of the Senate presiding. The statute further directs that the electoral votes be counted, and then the results be presented to the President of the Senate, who shall then “announce the state of the vote.” The statute then provides a mechanism for objections to be registered and resolved in the following language:

    “[e]very objection shall be made in writing,and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made . . . shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision.”

    That’s an interesting quote… interesting for what the DOJ left out.

    They conveniently cut the statute off when they bring it into the brief. The uncensored passage from 3 U.S.C. § 15 states:

    Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof…