Aol-Huffington post, Sacramento Bee are writing about ObamaForgeryGate
Posted on | January 4, 2012 | 1 Comment
Read more here: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/01/04/134790/orly-taitz-hails-judges-decision.html#storylink=cpy
“Birther” attorney Orly Taitz, … vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present.
www.sacbee.com/2012/01/04/4162405/orly-taitz-hails…
Orly taitz news. See the latest headlines on orly taitz from AOL News. Videos, photos & orly taitz pictures on all of the latest news from the US & around the world.
www.aolnews.com/tag/orly%20taitz – Cached
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “Aol-Huffington post, Sacramento Bee are writing about ObamaForgeryGate”
Leave a Reply













29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 5th, 2012 @ 4:08 am
Orly,
Here is a blog post about your case, although it doesn’t mention you by name.
https://volokh.com/2012/01/04/georgia-administrative-law-judge-allows-case-challenging-president-obamas-qualification-to-go-forward
“Georgia Administrative Law Judge Allows Case Challenging President Obama’s Qualification to Go Forward
Eugene Volokh • January 4, 2012 8:54 pm
…
My view, though not as one who is an expert on the subject, is that the plaintiffs’ legal claims are not sound as a matter of the merits. First, “natural-born citizen” means, roughly, “citizen at birth”; citizens come in two kinds, natural-born and naturalized. Second, when the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” that means that all persons born in the United States are natural-born citizens (setting aside those not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, a very small category that may cover children of diplomats and the like, but surely doesn’t cover President Obama, who, like nearly everyone else in the U.S., was subject to its jurisdiction).”
I don’t think Volokh is fully aware of the scope of your case, but I am wondering, do you agree with his analysis of what natural born citizen means?
If you disagree with his analysis and if you have time, it might be useful to post a short comment at the link explaining his mistake. I think he is fairly influential among conservative bloggers. If the situation is clear cut I think he would recognize it and if you could get him to accept the argument that Obama isn’t a natural born and eligible to be president it might generate more mainstream support for your efforts.
Also I think many of your supporters would also like to know your opinion of his analysis if you have time to spare to post about it.
Thanks