73 Responses to “Yap, it looks like Obama regime got to yet another judge, he states that Minor does not control and no witness was persuasive. Keep in mind, Obama was supposed to prove his eligibility and he did not provide any witnesses and he did not provide any evidence”

1. Commentor
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:10 pm

   I’m so very sad the Judge ruled in favor of Obama.

   Keep faith.

2. William Blasingame
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

   we are done. Most of us will be hauled away and thrown in jail THis is High treason Now they will say we have commited High Treason and NDAA was drafted to put birthers away. RUN for your life. they will come for you and me. And nothing you or I can do about it short of taking up arms. And that will just get us killed. Justice has failed and America is no longer A free country. We will all die at the hands of obamas forces. Run for the Hills they will be comeing for us in days now.

3. The Last Patriot
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:19 pm

   The constitutional republic was murdered today. We now live in a marxist monolithical oligarchy. We are now the biggest banana republic in the world.

   Equity is for those who are vigilant at law. We have failed to protect the great gifts that the founding fathers gave us.

   The government no longer responds to the will of the people.

4. Pat
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:30 pm

   William Blasingame if that’s not a joke post you are so stupid it’s unbelievable.

5. Gary Dugas
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:33 pm

   The End is near…..Obama is Satan

6. Gary Dugas
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:42 pm

   Malihi’s finding goes to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who will make the final determination. Can you petition Kemp?

7. Tim
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

   Obama is in contempt of court and basically he is nevertheless be given a free pass!! It is very hard to believe!!

   If I understand you well, you might have been better off accepting a default judgement!!!

8. William Blasingame
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:52 pm

   Im guessing now we need to pray Sheriff Joe releases his investigation and its not written by obamas lawyer.

9. Scott
   February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:54 pm

   Obama will be re-elected I believe. Why? He’ll steal the votes. There will either not be an election or there will be a stolen one. I think per chance he doesn’t Romney will pick up the Socialist Marxist agenda and run with it.

   The bottom line is this Americans want the status quo. America had her chance and I believe we’ve past that marker. We may very well be nuked in the near future.

   America has not been what we needed to be for many years. We were a christian nation but not anymore.

   I do not fear what’s it coming because destruction is imminent.

10. katherine
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:01 pm

    Whoa! This is just amazing! I am speechless!

    Orly, What a true American you are! Your presentations were brilliant! Thank you for all your hard work and efforts, in the end they will not go unnoticed!

    Folks – we have to vote the usurper out!

11. orly taitz
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:02 pm

    he had a chance to provide all the evidence, why didn’t he?

12. orly taitz
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:04 pm

    no, default judgments are easily overturned and we would have nothing. This way we have a record of criminal activity, sworn testimony, with which we can go to the higher courts, even to the Supreme court and international courts for human rights. We can show the world community, that we have criminals running the country.

13. dude911
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:05 pm

    There are enough illegal immigrants that can vote in this nation to give obama a victory.

    As long as he gives them food stamps and medicade, they wont feel bad about breaking our laws.

14. The Last Patriot
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:06 pm

    Why show up and enter any evidence when the fix was in form the very beginning? It’s the kabuki dance…political theater…we have been bamboolzed and sucker-punched.

15. Bob
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:15 pm

    Thank God we won. United States Of Communist America can’t be stopped. We are invincible. Malcolm X must be proud of our leader Obama so must be MLK. Obama is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. So proud of him.

    Birthers, you should submit and walk the fine line from now on. You can’t stop this communist revolution. Soon Obama will issue a presidential order to amend this great constitution to increase reelection terms. There is nothing you can do about that. We know you are all too cowards to do anything. We will defend Obama and this country from all of you oligarchs! It’s out time now. The blacks’ time! Acorn’s time! Black Panthers’ time!

    Bob
    Obama until 2050

16. Geir Smith
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:20 pm

    >Gary Dugas
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 2:33 pm

    The End is near…..Obama is Satan>

    Maybe the Illinois Lottery draw of 666 on Obama’s victory day is convincing that a miracle happened to show us Obama is in fact the Antichrist.

    Spread the news and this will all be over and Obama defeated.

    By spreading this you’ll be freed to heaven.

    Let’s reveal Obama is the Antichrist, because the Illinois lottery drew 666, the day of his victory. https://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/lisa_miller/2008/11/is_obama_and_antichrist.html

    Is Obama the Antichrist?

    On Nov. 5, Todd Strandberg was at his desk, fielding E-mails from around the world. As the editor and founder of RaptureReady.com, his job is to track current events and link them to biblical prophecy in hopes of maintaining his status as “the eBay of prophecy,” the best source online for predictions and calculations concerning the end of the world. Already Barack Obama had drawn the attention of apocalypse watchers after an anonymous e-mail circulated among conservative Christians in October implying that he was the Antichrist. Former “Saturday Night Live” ingénue Victoria Jackson fueled the fire when, according to news reports, she wrote on her Web site that Obama “bears traits that resemble the anti-Christ.” Now Strandberg was receiving up-to-the-minute news from his constituents in Illinois. One of the winning lottery numbers in the president-elect’s home state was 666– which, as everyone knows, is the sign of the Beast (also known as the Antichrist). “It is very eerie, and I take it for a sign as to who he really is,” wrote one of Strandberg’s correspondents.

    Ever since Jesus Christ was crucified and, according to the Gospels, rose again in glory, his followers have been anticipating the end of history–the time when their Lord will return to earth and reign for a thousand years. The question has always been when. Most Christians don’t worry about the end too much; it’s an abstract concept, a theological puzzle for late-night pondering. A few, however, have always believed that it is coming–and soon. Millennialist movements, as they’re called, gain prominence especially when the world grows chaotic, during wars and at the turn of every century. According to a 2006 study by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, a third of white evangelicals believe the world will end in their lifetimes. These mostly conservative Christians believe a great battle is imminent. After years of tribulation–natural disasters, other cataclysms (such as the collapse of financial markets)–God’s armies will vanquish armies led by the Antichrist himself. He will be a sweet-talking world leader who gathers governments and economies under his command to further his own evil agenda. In this world view, “the spread of secular progressive ideas is a prelude to the enslavement of mankind,” explains Richard Landes, former director of the Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University.

    No wonder, then, that Obama triggers such fear in the hearts of America’s millennialist Christians. Mat Staver, dean of Liberty University’s law school, says he does not believe Obama is the Antichrist, but he can see how others might. Obama’s own use of religious rhetoric belies his liberal positions on abortion and traditional marriage, Staver says, positions that “religious conservatives believe will threaten their freedom.” The people who believe Obama is the Antichrist are perhaps jumping to conclusions, but they’re not nuts: “They are expressing a concern and a fear that is widely shared,” Staver says.

    Before Christ comes again, those who are saved will ascend to heaven, according to this end-times theology, in a huge, upward whoosh called the Rapture. Strandberg is so certain that the Rapture is coming, he’s bought a number of Internet addresses in addition to RaptureReady: AntiAntichrist, Tribulationus and RaptureMe. In the event that RaptureReady crashes during the apocalypse, anyone who needs an update will, with a simple Google search, be able to get one. Strandberg says Obama probably isn’t the Antichrist, but he’s watching the president-elect carefully. On his Web site, he has something called the Rapture Index, a calculation based on signs and prophecy of the proximity of the end. According to Strandberg, any number over 160 means “fasten your seat belts.” Obama’s win pushed the index to 161.

17. Kelly
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:25 pm

    Is there a way to get House Speaker or ethics chairman Darryl Issa to investigate?

18. Dean Striker
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:27 pm

    Dang! I have just spent most of this day on a Sodahead blog-post cheering a WIN reported on
    https://www.sodahead.com/united-states/obama-will-not-be-on-the-ballot-in-georgia/question-2436171/

    This has been going on and on for years. The truth remains the same but the hurdles are rigged. Obama seems able to get away with anything, which is the very reason he needs to be ousted.

    Orly, you’ve tried so very hard, and that’s so appreciated. I’m afraid we’ve lost the last of our liberty.

19. Commentor
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:27 pm

    So did Judge Malihi basically place the burden of proof on plaintiffs? Rather than on Obama?

20. Kelly
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

    Bob, put that crack pipe down. This battle is NOT over!

21. Kate
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

    Bob, be careful what you wish for. The Commies get rid of the “useful idiots” first, and you look like you might be on the list. ;0)

22. Gary Dugas
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:29 pm

    Your Youtube tweets are a mess….what is the new birth certificate that O’Donnel was talking about? Why didn’t you have EXPERT witnesses, I hate to say this but YOU blew it. Your case was very weak. You are up against a corrupt system, you allowed a judge to use you and make a fool of you. Did you argue that it was up to Obama to prove his eligibility???? You offered hearsay not evidence.

23. John
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:29 pm

    Dr. Orly,

    I read the the Judge’s decision. It sounds contrived. The judge completely disregarded all evidence placed in the record.

24. Jennifer
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:30 pm

    Dr. Taitz, God bless your efforts but I am beyond shocked at the judge’s ruling. There is no justice in this nation anymore – people at every level of government have been bought by the most corrupt president in US history.
    I’m holding out hope for Sheriff Joe’s investigation. What then? Is there even one lawmaker in this nation who will stand for Truth?

25. Anonym
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:36 pm

    Orly, do you remember my comment no. 8 in your blog no. 30910 ?

    On January 29, a reader at the ‘Coach is Right’ blog WARNED:

    “Just heard on the news this morning that of all states, guess which state has now risen to the top of consideration for not one, but two new nuclear power plant facilities to be built? You guessed it, Georgia…

    “Should be interesting to watch how this plays out over the next month or so. LOTS of backroom negotiations on the line here now with BILLIONS of dollars in construction jobs, federal revenue, state tax revenues and more at stake.

    . . .”

    https://www.coachisright.com/obama-attorney-knows-eligibility-hearing-was-disaster-for-the-president/

26. naturalBornCitizen@naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

    Bob you are so stupid, with true communism you wouldn’t even be able to be on this forum and comment on this you dumb ass! Is that what you REALLY want?

27. David Gurney
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 3:49 pm

    The judge’s accountant called him up to make him aware of the fact that his 401K was heavily invested in the casualty insurers,most of whom would be put of business after the actions of Obama’s fans when they found out about his ineligibility.

28. WHATSUP
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:00 pm

    What is an expert witness? Isn’t the “immigration/deportation”, “OFFICER” witness an EXPERT?
    On appeal one could ask what the judge considers and EXPERT witness… is it the judges job to make an expert witness? Is the juciary’s job to make an expert witness. If there are no guidelines then how can a judge make an “expert witness” declaration to adjudicate a plaintiffs case ?

29. MichaelN
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:05 pm

    The Judge Malihi misinterpreted the Minor Court holding.

    The doubts about “this class” were doubts as to whether they were even ordinary CITIZENS, not as Malihi claims, whether they were ‘natural born citizens’

    The Minor court DID NOT (as Malihi suggests) leave open the question as to whether children born in the US to alien parents were “natural born citizens”…… it was the question as to whether they were CITIZENS at all.

    Error in the court.

30. Anonym
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:09 pm

    @ Kelly (no. 17), lots of luck getting the “House Speaker or ethics chairman Darryl Issa to investigate.” Take a look at this about Boehner and the Gunwalker investigation:

    https://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/02/sipsey-street-exclusive-meet-silent.html

    The regime is closing in. The constricting is getting tighter and tighter and tighter . . .

31. Gary Dugas
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:49 pm

    Saw this on repubx.com……I read through the judges rationale for his decision and a couple of things bothered me. I’ll leave the Natural Born Citizen issue out of this because it will eventually be appealed to the Supreme Court but likely not decided any time soon.
    One question was that the Georgia (and many other states) election statutes rely on the party to certify the candidates eligibility. If that’s true, then the certification of Obama by the DNC in 2008 should have at least been questioned because of the omitted verbage stating that Obama and McCain met the eligibility requirements per the constitution (which was entered into evidence). If the DNC (or Nancy Pelosi who was the DNC chair in 2008) signed off on eligibility then what documents did they have for proof? Maybe that’s where the challenge should be instead. Because all they could have based it on would have been a copy or digital print out of Obama’s birth certificate. So, if that is proven to be a forgery, show’s over. Was Nancy Pelosi subpoenaed or anyone from the DNC? Was there a FOIA requesting the documentation they used or that they require to certify eligibility? Which brings me to my next question. The testimony and documents submitted by Doug Vogt regarding the birth certificate being a digitally manipulated forgery was submitted to the F.B.I. to investigate months ago. So did they investigate, what were their findings or did they even respond? Because rather than deposing Mr. Vogt, it seems like the F.B.I. should have been called to render an opinion as the courts expert witness. Notice the judge didn’t mention the testimony of the former immigration officer regarding E-verify etc. but I thought his came closest to expert and compelling regarding the process and I believe he also stated that he had been called to testify as an “expert witness” before. It would also have been interesting to find out what, if any, difference there would have been if plaintiffs had allowed a default judgement with no testimony. My opinion (which is worth about two bits and a pack of juicy fruit) is that it was entirely unnecessary for the judge to rule on anything but the Georgia election statutes in order to deny plaintiffs ballot challenge. The fact that he went so overboard in doing so seemed questionable to me. Kind of like the Senate resolution to John McCain’s eligibility. It isn’t law or settled law, just opinion based on other opinions, but piled up in a big enough stack are they hoping it will actually represent “precedent” down the road?

32. Daniel
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:52 pm

    “The Judge Malihi misinterpreted the Minor Court holding.”

    Yeah ’cause every birther knows the law better than every judge and constitutional expert in the country.

    ROFLMAO

33. Omni
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:55 pm

    It’s intereing how long that ruling took, and especially strange that he was going to give a default ruling on the first day, Jan. 1st. in favor of the plaintiffs.

    Looks like the Georgia Secretary of State was more sympathetic to the cause than Judge Malihi.

34. Mark
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 4:57 pm

    https://www.notmygovernment.us

35. Richard Kopel
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:01 pm

    DEATH THREATS WILL DO A LOT TO INFLUENCE A JUDGES DECISION, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES FROM THE SAME CRIMINALS WHO MURDERED JFK AND STAGED THE 9/11 ATTACKS.

    THE ONLY WAY THERE WILL BE JUSTICE IN THIS NATION IS TO REMOVE THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE HIJACKED THE GOVERNMENT.

36. Ken B.
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:29 pm

    I could tell by the Judge’s demeanor on Jan 26th that he had already been bought. He was condescending, and impatient with Orly.

    It’s time to drop back and punt, and come up with a new strategy.

    Persist Until You Succeed.

37. Mark
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:33 pm

    Orly may I ask you a question? It is a eft field type of question but I am convinced that this type of thought is now necessary to break these issues. Orly, the British Crown is a LEGAL PERSON in law. As is the US Federal government as is the United states of America as is the United Nations, courts, states etc etc etc. They are all “legal fictions” and have been given legal personality as have Corporations. The point is this: You are attempting to attack not only Barack Obama but the very state apparatus which has created his Presidency. That State, if you were to succeed, would see itself losing its entire legitimacy it would not only be the removal of Barack Obama. The State will NOT allow this to happen. The thing is, that as a legal person (and you and I and every single other person with a birth certificate is one also) the fundamental rule of “law” is that all PERSONS are equal before it. Such being the case, if the people (legal/natural persons) bringing this lawsuit against Barack Obama (and the state which he is meant to be head of) are bringing into a state institution (the Court) and pleading with the state to find that it and its head of state are illegitimate, then what you have is a situation where there is a fundamental conflict of interest. The State will NOT rule against itself. Now, there is another fundamental principle of “law” which is this: “It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest.” Nemo_iudex_in_causa_sua. Is it then not possible to file a motion based upon this?

38. The Obama Timeline author
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:40 pm

    Shades of Judge David O. Carter in Barnett v. Obama.

39. j&b fog
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:53 pm

    I call Fraud on the court. And the stolen SSN# in it self should have kept him off the ballot.

40. Robert Bishop
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 5:59 pm

    So..thanks to all these rulings, all our enemies have to do is just come over here knock up a woman born in the U.S., take the kid back to their country, raise it to hate U.S.A and to all to destroy it, then bring the child back over here as an adult, who can then run for President and then ruin us from the inside…in effect destroying our country without firing one shot..

41. Bucky
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 6:30 pm

    “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in (our own) government.” – Thomas Jefferson

42. Lisa
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 6:47 pm

    It has been said before…
    The Secretary of State ultimately decises. The judge only issues a recommendation.

    Is it possible the Secretary of State will still uphold law and deny obama’s elligibility to be on the ballot?

    For the sake of America I hope so.

43. Lisa
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 7:03 pm

    Luke 10:18 “And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”
    In ancient Hebrew the word for lightning is barack, the word for heaven or the
    heights is bama and to connect the words either an “a” or an “o” is used.

44. William Balint
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 7:25 pm

    Orly, I am in Indiana and quite familiar with these proceedings. I have independently sent you this information but want to share it with your readers as well. My approach to this issue has been much different than most up to this point. http://www.lojack12.com/Constitution/Native born (facebook).html How can I challenge the Ankeny opinion. I have already started on the Election Board.

45. Rikker
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 7:34 pm

    I must admit….it was US who go to Judge Malihi. Orly, you saw us in that courtroom and failed to demand our ouster. Instead you allowed us to influence that judge. And we did it.

    I didn’t think he’d do it this time as the other 96 judges had done. I was SURE that this judge would withstand our inscrutable influence.

    But no. We got to him. And now you see the result.

    I feel terrible.

46. azwayne
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 8:13 pm

    I think a good group of vigilantes would be more successful. That’s what the country really needs.

47. Bill
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 9:26 pm

    Robert Bishop is concerned about the possibility that a foreign power is going to create a Manchurian candidate by impregnating some woman in the US, waiting for her to give birth, getting her to move overseas and indoctrinating her kid before sending him back to win elect to the highest office in the land. Sure, it could happen! I’m curious why he thinks that simply being born of two US citizens would render a kid immune to such brainwashing?

48. Frank Coniff
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 9:54 pm

    Azwayne, you’re the birther poster child. Stupid and violent.

49. Donna Marie
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 10:52 pm

    I had really gotten my hopes up with this case. I thought, naively, that we had finally caught a break. Now I feel really demoralized by Malihi’s decision, as I’m sure a lot of you do.I wonder if it was Malihi’s plan all along to act like he was giving us credence, when he always knew that he was going to rule in favor of Obama. In other words, Maybe we were ”
    had.”
    I am now hoping that Sheriff Arpaio comes up with something that might help us out. Or maybe I’m just being naive again. At any rate, Thank you Orly–you did a fantastic job and put up a good fight.
    Let’s all get a good night’s sleep and maybe things will look better in the morning.

50. https://www.obamabirthcertificate.net
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 11:32 pm

    Judge Malihi issued a flawed ruling by incorrectly citing “Arkeny v. Governor.” “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this Court. Arkeny v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).” There name of the appellant was not Arkeny, the correct name is Ankeny. The referenced citation should have been, Ankeny v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). See https://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf for confirmation.

    Since the judge attempted to use Ankeny v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009), perhaps it’s wise and seasonable to appeal the case to the Indiana Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court, so it can’t be used to thwart eligibility challenges pending in other states.

    The appellants Steve Ankeny and Bill Kruse, conducted their case Pro Se. Perhaps having a competent attorney would have easily precluded this blight on the legal landscape from contaminating efforts by others. Surely Mr. Ankeny and Mr. Kruse could have benefited greatly by having legal counsel and better arguments.

    Those of Mario Apuzzo come immediately to mind as presented in his analysis of Ankeny v. Governor. Mario Apuzzo, Esq., “How Obama’s Enablers Mislead the Public on the Meaning of an Article II “Natural Born” Citizen” https://puzo1.blogspot.com (October 10, 2011. Reposted January 9, 2012).

    The ruling by Judge Malihi also noted instances where it’s been assumed by others, that the term “natural born citizen” is not defined in the Constitution. He erred by ignoring the context of those remarks and in dismissing his own ability to reason, as it was his responsibility to judge, not also assume.

    The simple fact is that the constitution does not define any terms. The words: defined, definition or meaning, do not appear anywhere in the Constitution. George Washington and the other Founding Fathers, were writing the supreme law of the land for a new Constitutional Republic in the prayerful hope of establishing a free nation that would long be worthy their sacrifice of blood and treasure, not a dictionary.

    The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 2, Section 1, actually does in fact logically and irrefutably define a natural born citizen as one born in the U.S. to U.S. citizen parents, in a clear and concise manner consistent with the precise language and clarity the Founding Fathers carefully crafted into the entire Constitution.

    This plain logic that the founding fathers surely expected us to grasp, is demonstrated in the article by yours truly, “Obama Is Not An Eligible Natural Born Citizen!” https://www.obamabirthcertificate.net/2011/08/obama-is-not-natural-born-citizen.html (July 4, 2011).

51. Carl Manning
    February 3rd, 2012 @ 11:33 pm

    I would suggest writing the Georgia Secretary of State. Brian Kemp, a personal letter advising him of misprision if he allows Obama on the Georgia ballot even if there has been a sham “hearing” by this despicable judge. His ruling based on the ruling of the Indiana judge conflates the 14th Amendment with Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, and in so doing allows anchor babies of illegal aliens and enemies of the United States to run for President. This ruling is not only laughable but highly insulting to common sense!!! Remind him that the Executive branch of the State of Georgia and indeed all States has the ultimate controlling authority on matters of the ballot. The judge’s ruling is clearly un-Constitutional lunacy, and for him to accept it is tantamount to misprision of a felony and High Treason!!!

52. orly taitz
    February 4th, 2012 @ 1:42 am

    I don’t know if Arpaio will succeed in anything. He had an option to testify GA, he did not do so
    Jan Brewer, governor of GA is full of hot air, she vetoed the eligibility bill. Az state government might be as corrupt as the state government in HI or IL, just full of hot air to ponder to conservative constituency

53. tom
    February 4th, 2012 @ 5:35 am

    Commenter “Robert” #40 states: “, all our enemies have to do is just come over here knock up a woman born in the U.S.”

    NOT QUITE, BOB
    It is now a lot easier than your scenario suggests–one need only inseminate/impregnate a U.S. Citizen female, found anywhere on the planet and have her “drop” the delivery on U.S.

    In other words “they”/”our enemies” don’t “have come over here” and the “woman” needn’t have been “born in the U.S.” She need only be in possession of U.S. Citizenship and where she’s “knocked up” is irrelevant–simply insure that child is born on U.S. soil and subsequently puts it fulfills its 14 yr residency requirement

54. Aaron Hank
    February 4th, 2012 @ 6:52 am

    I was hoping that the state of Georgia would have acted in an honorable Constitutional way.If it had, I would have brought my business to the state of Georgia.—Now they can just forget it—My business has the potential to bring trillions of dollars to any state in which it resides…I am not making this up—Now Georgia will get nothing.—Are there any other states out there who are interested? All you have to do is the right thing and your state will get jobs and tax money that will be beyond belief—Don’t be like Georgia…Be smart…

55. itchik
    February 4th, 2012 @ 9:19 am

    gunfire”. Accept it. There is corruption at the highest levels of government. Is it the end of the world? Absolutely not!

    The Founders knew what we might be facing over 200 years ago. In their incredible wisdom, they have already provided remedy for what we are facing today. You fret and you struggle for the simple reason that you refuse to face the facts about where we are as a nation and what it will require for us to get back to where we belong. In a word: VIOLENCE.

    You speak of defeat because you are afraid to fight. You lament the loss of America because you are lazy. Why? Are you really ready to simply give-in and let a low-breed, half-assed usurping retard like Barry take it all away from you without a fight? Well then, shame on you! You DESERVE to lose your republic. Sorry, but NOT ME. They aren’t taking my country, my freedom or my way of life without the fight of their lives. You sissies may want to cower in the corner, crying and whining that “it’s over”? Fine… but not me. I’ve got a WHOLE BUNCH of fight left in me.

    It ain’t over ’til it’s over and when I say over, I mean after I’ve emptied every magazine of every round I have been stocking up on. They can have my guns when they are empty, smoking-hot and buried under three feet of empty brass – and make no mistake, that is EXACTLY what we are talking about here. That is EXACTLY what it will take to preserve this nation. You are sad and fearful because you refuse to face the reality that this Republic is worth fighting for and keeping it will require exactly that – a fight. Maybe even your life. Is it worth it? It is to me. Give me freedom or give me death. PERIOD. Unfortunately for my enemies, I give as good as I get and I’m going out in color.

    Stop whining. Start buying ammo, training with your firearms and getting used to the idea that Easy Street has No Parking signs. It’s time to earn our keep. Grow up. Be thankful that your life of leisure an opportunity has so-far required very little of you. Those days are over. The good life can still be ours, but the tree of liberty must from time to time be sprinkled with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Now is that time. The Founders knew this and made the sacrifice so you and I could live the lives we have lived thus far. Are you ready to live a life worthy of their sacrifice? I am. This fight has JUST BEGUN.

56. Ken B. (Fort Mill, SC)
    February 4th, 2012 @ 9:20 am

    I believe the TRUE PATRIOTS of this WONDERFUL country should come together and brain storm as to how we can get this usurper out of the White House.

    ALL of the great legal minds out there need to put their EGOS to the side and work together in coming up with a plan to oust this fraud.

    But I want to emphasize that ALL of you attorneys and ALL experts need to put your EGOS to the side.

    In order to remove this imposter, we need to work TOGETHER, put our minds TOGETHER and come up with a MIRACULOUS, and WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN.

    WE CAN DO IT. WE ARE AMERICAN PATRIOTS

    PERSIST UNTIL YOU SUCCESS!

57. Stunning News from Georgia – ‘Judicial Fiat From the Bench – Changed the Meaning of the Constitution and Natural Born Citizen’ | askmarion
    February 4th, 2012 @ 3:00 pm

    […] YAP, IT LOOKS LIKE OBAMA REGIME GOT TO YET ANOTHER JUDGE, HE STATES THAT MINOR DOES NOT CONTROL AND … […]

58. itchik
    February 4th, 2012 @ 4:09 pm

    Why do you all persist in this myth that there is some purely legal tidy little remedy to removing this fraud from office? Don’t you get it? The law only works on those who respect the law. It is abundantly clear that no amount of legal negotiation will remove this fraud from office. Face it: it is fight or die. When I say fight, I am NOT speaking metaphorically. When are you people going to face this? What is it that makes you people think you are any different than Paine, Jefferson and Adams? EARN IT.

59. Gary Dugas
    February 4th, 2012 @ 4:26 pm

    Quick, this is a test: Other than the first 7 US Presidents (George Washington–Andrew Jackson) and Chester A. Arthur who became President after James A. Garfield was assassinated, name the only person to be elected President that was not a natural-born Citizen? . . . . Give up? Why it was our current putative occupant of the White House, Barack H. Obama. Shazaam!

    Here is a bonus question: How many times did the Congress (Senate and House of Representatives) try to alter the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 natural-born requirement for President between 2003–2008? . . . . . . . . . let me answer this question before the buzzer sounds. It was 8 times that this alteration was attempted. Only Senate Resolution 511 (4/10/2008), technically the ninth attempt, was successful except that it was applied to John McCain and not to one of the co-sponsors, Barack H. Obama who eventually was the Democratic nominee. This resolution stated that two citizen parents were essential. Why wasn’t this litmus test applied to Obama? By the way, one of the other co-sponsors was Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. She could have passed this requirement. Why didn’t she insist that this same standard be applied to her and the other co-sponsor Obama. I believe she made a strategic mistake when she failed to take advantage of this situation. Perhaps she missed a golden opportunity or maybe she realized that Resolutions are often not worth the paper they are printed on.

    This whole sorry situation was pre-meditated and our complicit media, judiciary and Congressional leaders are in on this con job. I never would have imagined until 3 years ago that not a single person in either the House or the Senate would not have come forward to blow up this conspiracy. I am truly ashamed that the USA has reached this state of moral collapse. It appears the so-called Republicans stand ready to nominate Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal who are not natural-born Citizens just like the joke that is in the White House. If they can’t get this right, what makes us think that they can or will solve any of the other hard questions that face our once great nation?

60. Pete
    February 5th, 2012 @ 7:27 am

    We are losing the fight at the Federal and State level, and also within the corrupt US Judicial system.

    I believe we should continue our efforts at these levels, but it is now prudent and necessary for us to set up a coalition within the local conservative county/regional level dedicated to the support of the County Sheriff as we face the existing and forthcoming unconstitutional usurpation’s of the various Federal Agencies.

    I have a brief position paper on this subject if anyone would care to read it, but I don’t know how to send it out as an attachment within this forum.

61. orly taitz
    February 5th, 2012 @ 7:54 am

    show me one single sheriff, who had the guts to support us.
    Arpaio talked a lot, but so far I saw nothing but talk

62. ANTI-CON
    February 5th, 2012 @ 1:25 pm

    I’m curious, is the BIRTHER QUEEN going to start a BIRTHER crusade against MUTT ROMNEY, after all, his father was born in Mexico and according to the BIRTHER code one must have both parents who are U.S. born citizens in order to run for president,.. right?

    How about it oh high QUEEN of BIRTHERISM, are you setting your sights on the likely GOP pick to go up against President Obama in the primary ?

63. orly taitz
    February 5th, 2012 @ 1:56 pm

    no, both parents need to be citizens, when one is born. when Romney was born, both of his parents were US citizens

64. Pat
    February 5th, 2012 @ 2:15 pm

    LOL at Aaron Hank. Trillions of dollars but you can’t even spell?

65. orly taitz
    February 5th, 2012 @ 5:46 pm

    I can’t condone violence

66. Elizabeth
    February 5th, 2012 @ 7:17 pm

    Pat.. I give up.. as an English teacher,
    I have looked at Aaron Hanks’ post and
    I do not see any misspelled words.

    Help me out, here.

67. uwho
    February 6th, 2012 @ 10:10 am

    We are definetly in the end times. Speaking to those of you who are believers, I don’t mean to sound like a pessimist, but if Obama is not re-elected, the one that comes after him will be worse. And the reason I think this is because, When God said the world as we know it would change, we all thought that he meant “the world would get better”. But since his people did not humble themselves and prayed “the wheels of doom are in motion”. Now what it means is that this corruption, slavery, treasonous, way of life must continue. What is happening is that those who choose, their material things and sin will be staying here. What God is doing is that he is giving EVERYONE the opportunity to see what you are choosing if you do not repent. Realize that this is only a glimpse. After the church is removed, only then we will get a look at what H*ll really is, because God will remove his spirit, whom protects us and keeps EVIL at bay. THE WORLD IS CHANGING, BUT FOR THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO STAY. God is begining to show us what the world will look like when he is not here.

68. Ted
    February 6th, 2012 @ 2:58 pm

    Orly,

    Surely you are not going to accept this ruling without filing an appeal. Malihi is merely a administrative law judge (with all due respect) and not judge of general jurisdiction. Every state has a process to appeal an administrative law judge ruling like this and get a review by a “real judge” and then up through the Court of Appeals, the GA Supreme Court, and then to the US Supreme Court.

    This case has got to go to the SCOTUS eventually to get a definitive interpretation on the meaning of “natural born citizen” as a qualifier for president. This case is the best shot at it that you will ever have, with a very conservative Supreme Court.

    The evidence here on the “natural born citizen” issue is practically stipulated. It’s purely a question of law and all your legal research is already done. Go for it.

    What’s your game plan?

    Ted

69. orly taitz
    February 6th, 2012 @ 3:28 pm

    the appeal was already filed with the Sec of State

70. Ted
    February 6th, 2012 @ 7:48 pm

    Great. Good luck.

71. Luke
    February 10th, 2012 @ 10:30 pm

    I couldn’t have written this worse. Keep blogging!

72. poker on iphone
    February 11th, 2012 @ 8:26 am

    poker on iphone
    Do U know a good place where I can find the best poker on iphone

73. Homepage
    February 11th, 2012 @ 9:30 am

    … [Trackback]…

    […] There you will find 20952 more Infos: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31124 […]…

Leave a Reply