Why did I post a receipt for the FedEx sent to John Sampson
Posted on | October 20, 2012 | 5 Comments
On Peter Boyle show John Sampson claimed that a subpoena was defective because it was mailed to his work address. He put his address at issue. Additionally his residence address is at issue, a he is running for office in Colorado and needs to show that he resides in the district.
In response I served him yet again by FedEx nd posted the receipt, showing that the subpoena was received yet again at his home address and he does not have any excuse not to show up and not to testify. He can be found in contempt of court and liable to Plaintiffs, if he does not comply with the subpoena and does not show up to testify and authenticate his own sworn afidavit
Comments
5 Responses to “Why did I post a receipt for the FedEx sent to John Sampson”
Leave a Reply
October 20th, 2012 @ 7:17 am
JOHN WHY DONT YOU give Orly Taitz a chance- she is doing what alotta government officials should be doing against this incredible FRAUD against America- officials like Bennet have been bought & paid for and the diehard DEMOCRATs dont care that Obama is a FRAUD-because party loyalty trumps all- they have sold their souls to the devil- she is getting frustrated because these law officials wHich should be on her side are not answering the subpoenaes because of minor details in the subpoenae- These are not the actions of honorable men- becvause we should do what’s right for America regardless if we like the person we have to deal with- sometimes law officials get exagerated opinions of themselves and feel that they should automatically get respect because of their office rather than earn it- they havent earned my respect by not answering a subpoena because of minor technicalicties- alotta people feel a deal was cut behind closed doors when Obama dropped the charges against Arpaio- I know Arpaio is a good man and so is Zullo and Sampson but they dropped the ball this time-
October 20th, 2012 @ 10:43 am
What is the matter with these people?
Arpaio, Zullo, and now Sampson — they talk big talk, but when it comes time to testify under oath they do the dance of the dodgers, and run away as fast as they can.
Why are they all so desperate to avoid your multiple subpoenas? Are they afraid of being forced to tell the truth? In open court? Under oath?
We smell a rat here, Orly. Maybe many rats.
You are the only one who actually prosecutes these many cases, Orly. These others? They just give press conferences, go on one another’s talk shows, and raise $millions for God-knows-what.
These people are phonies.
There must be a very bad reason why now Sampson is dodging you, just like all the others have been doing.
October 20th, 2012 @ 11:37 am
“dropped the ball” is an understatement.
October 20th, 2012 @ 2:25 pm
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. you POSTED that FEDEX Receipt so everybody can plainly see that John N. Sampson was Properly SERVED.
John N. Sampson, for you own good show this Monday October 22nd, in Indiana and TESTIFY. By not showing up John N. Sampson you are placing yourself in “HARM’S WAY”, and the Judge could immediately issue a warrant for you ARREST for “CONTEMPT OF COURT”.
John N. Sampson I know that you are on the record saying that you are just too busy to show up in Court on October 22nd, in Indiana, but you were to busy to fly to Phoenix, AZ for a meeting with Sheriff Aroaio, Investigator Zullo, and a guy associated with World Net Daily who wrote a book about Barrack Hussein Obama and his dishonest shortcomings.
John N. Sampson, do yourself a big favor and show up in COURT on Monday, October 22nd, in Indiana, or you are go to go down in HISTORY as a “TURNCOAT COWARD”.
October 20th, 2012 @ 6:29 pm
If Obama wins there’s a herd of people going down in history.