Who would be an ideal additional plaintiff?
Posted on | October 8, 2009 | 6 Comments
Hundreds of people have contacted me asking to be additional plaintiffs in legal actions against Obama due to his illegitimacy for presidency. All of these people are taxpayers and, according to Flast v Cohen, they all do have standing.
I am trying to bring resolution to this issue as soon as possible and I prefer to add people who have additional injury- anything that happened after Jan 20 2009, after Obama’s inauguration. It can be an injury that was sustained or imminent: for example if someone is about to be deployed under Obama’s orders and he is not willing to go until Obama provides proof of legitimacy for presidency with real documents and not that photo shopped garbage he posted on the Internet- that is a case of imminent injury.
If you were deployed after Jan 20th, if you were wounded, lost a loved one; husband, wife, parent, child; if your car dealership was taken in this insane socialist power grab by the Obama regime, if you worked for the car dealership and lost your job- all of these are examples of specific injury.
On a different note I will have a hearing within a couple of weeks against Wells Fargo. If you got a mortgage from Wells Fargo, the bank sold your note to someone else and is still collecting mortgage from you or foreclosing your home, contact me 949-683-5411 or dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Comments
6 Responses to “Who would be an ideal additional plaintiff?”
October 8th, 2009 @ 9:52 pm
If you can add plaintiffs after a first series of plaintiffs are formalized… the health care bill, should it pass and get signed, with a mandatory dipping into bank accounts and fines and/or imprisonments for those who don’t want to play… will provide hundreds of thousands of litigants.
I like what Steve Neuenschwander said about the two olive branches. But can you be effective at trial without discovery, or can an order for discovery be issued so close to the trial date that Obie’s guys can’t react in time with an appeal?
If I understand what Steve is intending, the parties on the other side… Peloosey and Clanton and the rest… wouldn’t be deposed, but would open themselves up to perjury charges by way of their testimony on the stand at trial. I’ll bet they’ll sell out Obama in a heartbeat in order to have you not call them to the stand. Hillary is the one who knows all, and Nanci is the one who abetted all. Yeah, and don’t forget Diane Feinstine. She was in charge of vetting on the Senate side.
Watch out if they all get on the same plane together during the trial.
“WILL THE DEFENDANTS PLEASE RISE.”
October 8th, 2009 @ 10:30 pm
BO is obviously above the Constitution and need not prove his eligibilty, right? So how come when I tried the same thing, the employer wouldn’t go for it. I held back my SS#, but put in my passport. Sorry, no job; they reneged. So, I got injured by the BO example and, clearly, there’s a double standard. The requirements for a college lecturer are obviously more strenuous than the requirements for POTUS. Can’t wait ’til I get pulled over for a seat belt violation. “Sorry, officer, no driver’s license for you until BO shows me his birth certificate.” Equal protection? mmm…mmm…mmm.
October 9th, 2009 @ 12:07 am
Orly,
As I have been pushing toward a complaint/suit against the Pennsylvania Department of Education for incorrectly teaching a serious point of government education (violating their own curricula) in statements such as “Obama is our 44th President,” I have found this an excellent opportunity, another avenue, to fix this greatest Constitutional and national security violation.
Everyone around the nation should “follow suit.”
You are the world’s hero, whether they realize it or not.
John G. Freeman
Veteran and Member
Commander-in-Chief’s Guard and Escort to the President
Washington, D. C., 1980 – 1983 | Carter and Reagan
October 9th, 2009 @ 8:27 am
Three-step program to shut down the govt. —
1) Don’t sell to the govt.
2) Don’t work for the govt.
3) Don’t collaborate with the govt.
Who is John Galt?
October 9th, 2009 @ 8:34 am
I just issued my own “executive order” denying access to any and all of my records and, in addition, as part of this EO, I’m returning my SSN to the issuers. Can you recommend a team of lawyers to enforce my EO?
October 9th, 2009 @ 1:10 pm
Dr Taitz,
I was just wondering if you ever contacted Chuck Baldwin who was the Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He was eligible in almost all States in the Union. Like Alan Keyes, who finished second to Chuck Baldwin in the Constitution Party’s nomination proceedings, he definitely has “standing”. I believe Chuck has sincere doubts about the Constitutional qualifications of the usurper, our beloved Teleprompter-in-Chief. You can probably reach Chuck Baldwin through his website, chuckbaldwinlive.com, or at constitutionparty.com or constitutionparty.org.
Thank you sincerely for your diligence and uncommon valor, and I pray for God to bless your efforts at justice for the American People to expose the forces of darkness in high places.
Carl Manning
Constitution Party – Savannah, GA