White Ribbons in America. Article submited to English edition of Pravda
Posted on | March 25, 2012 | 12 Comments
White ribbons in America. Will Russians march in solidarity with us?
By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Leading Republican candidate for the US senate in CA 2012
OrlyTaitzForUSSenate.com RunOrlyRun.com orly.taitz@gmail.com
In the US we’ve watched protests in Russia, claims of elections fraud and white ribbons of solidarity with dissidents.
But what about the United States of America? The irony is that we, all 311 million Americans are victims of the biggest fraud in the history of this nation. Specifically, this is the fraud committed by one, Barack Hussein Obama. Unfortunately, the level of corruption among our governmental bureaucrats and judges and heavily censored and manipulated puppet US “main stream” (or truly backwater) media is enormous.Even with the undeniable evidence of fraud committed by Obama, we are yet to get a court ruling removing him from the ballot and prosecuting him to the full extent of the law for elections fraud, use of a computer generated forgery, claiming it to be a true and correct copy of his valid birth certificate, use of a stolen Social Security number and hiding his identity under the last name Soetoro and Soebarkah.
Well, I better start from the beginning. As Obama started running for the US Presidency, I could tell that much of what he was saying did not ring true and did not check out.
Probably the most troubling was the fact that he is using a Social Security number assigned to another individual.
In the United States the Social Security numbers were assigned by the states. The first 3 digits of the number that Obama is using, (042) were assigned to the state of Connecticut. Obama was never a resident of Connecticut and there is no legitimate reason for him to have this number.
I can disclose this number and make it public in this article for two reasons:
1. Inadvertently Obama himself made it public when he published his tax returns on line and did not flatten the PDF file. Thousands of individuals around the world opened the file using Adobe Illustrator program and got the number 042-68-4425.
2. We know that this number was assigned to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890. (If you believe that Obama is that person, you can stop reading this article, as nothing will get through to you anyways.)
In my research I was able to secure assistance of three licensed investigators: retired Scotland Yard senior officer Neil Sankey, licensed investigator Susan Daniels and recently retired senior Deportation Officer John Sampson. All of them searched different national databases, which are routinely used by licensed investigators and attorneys and came to the same conclusion: Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States and commander in Chief does not have a valid Social Security number. National databases showed his name linked to several Social Security numbers, none of which was issued in the state of Hawaii, where he grew up. The number that Obama used more often for most of his life, is a Connecticut Social Security number issued to a resident of Connecticut, whose date of birth shows as 1890. This was the same number that Obama posted on his tax returns: 042-68-4425.
I personally ran Obama’s registration with the selective service with the military. I entered Obama’s name, date of birth and the Social that Obama posted on line with his tax returns. It showed that indeed with yet another governmental agency Obama used this Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425.
Later a researcher by name Linda Jordan ran this number through E-verify, official Social Security verification service. It showed no match between the number and the name Barack Obama.
As I was conducting 21 law suits challenging Obama, I was getting thousands of e-mails and comments on my website OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Among thousands of e–mails were documents that came from concerned citizens from all of the country. Those documents showed more and more evidence of fraud committed by Obama and more and more evidence of unprecedented corruption in the top echelons of power in all three branches of the government and corruption among our manipulated media executives.
I received an e-mail from a retired US air force colonel. Colonel Gregory Hollister ran yet another governmental Social Security Number Verification Service, SSNVS. It showed that the number Obama is using in his tax returns and selective service documents was never issued to Barack Obama.
I watched the hype media reports about Obama. One of them was an evening report with Katie Couric, who purports to be a top reputable journalist. The report showed Obama’s old school in Indonesia. It showed his school records, where Obama was listed as a citizen of Indonesia going under the last name of his step father Lolo Soetoro. The same Katie Couric, who did her best to show the Republican Sarah Palin in a negative light, was just sitting there, staring at the screen without ever posing a question: “What is Obama’s citizenship status? Is it America or Indonesian? What is his legal last name?”
Couric just put on her blinders and dutifully took her place in the line of entertainment elite executives and “luminaries”, waiting to enter the White House and enjoy lavish parties. She was standing in line to kiss the feet of the liberal Democrat messiah, instead of waiting in line to ask some hard questions, choosing to sweep under the rug those pesky questions of Obama’s Indonesian citizenship, a name, which was not legally his, lack of a valid birth certificate and so many other unanswered important questions. Our entertainment elite who calls itself “progressive”, ended up being one of the most oppressive, repressive regime propaganda machines. Very few were reporting a word of truth about Obama and so many of them were complicit to the biggest case of fraud, forgery and treason in the US history.
On May 2, 2011 I was scheduled to argue my case in front of the 9th Circuit court of Appeals. I was the first attorney to get any hearings in open court on Obama’s case. By 2009 I was able to reach the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case. At the same time Donald Trump was raising concerns on Obama’s eligibility and Obama’s lack of a valid long form birth certificate. Obama’s approval ratings started dropping like a rock. By the end of April 2011 nearly half of Americans did not believe Obama had valid identification papers and they wanted to see those papers released.
Obama had to do something. On April 27th, only a few days before the hearing in the 9th Circuit Obama released what he called a copy of his long form birth certificate. As I looked at it, I should see right away that it was a crude forgery, not even a good one. I remembered other long form birth certificates from 1961. Those were on white paper with sighs of aging, had a readily detectable seal, the document had defined borders. What Obama provided was obviously a joke. The paper was different, there were no signs of aging, no defined borders, letters and numbers were of different fonts and sizes. As I was invited to the interviews on TV and radio, I was viciously attacks. On May 1 in the evening, only a few hours before my hearing in the 9th circuit and only 3 days after Obama released his alleged birth certificate, Obama appeared on national TV looking mighty Presidential and announced that he captured Osama Bin Laden. Surprisingly Bin Ladin was not sent to Guantanamo for interrogation, to get information about his vast military network, but rather he was immediately shot in the head and thrown overboard to feed some marine life. Celebration started, next morning I was arguing my case in the environment of the national hysteria. Donald Trump with all his millions or billions simply retreated. Many attorneys, who were involved in this fight, gave up and decided to turn to something else, as they felt helpless to go against this corrupt establishment.
I was watching everything that was going on around me and I felt like I was in the Germany in the early 30s. I would wake up in the middle of the night with nightmares. While the iron curtain was lifted in the Eastern Europe, the iron curtain of the most oppressive and the most illegitimate regime descended on the United States. I could barely stand the heavy load of everything thrown at me, the barrage of assaults, insults, tampering with my car, attacks on my family, attacks on my children. Some were saying: do you need the truth more than others? Is it worth it? Do you really believe you can win this David and Golliath fight? My answer to that was “Remember who won the David and Goliath fight?”
My perseverance started to bear fruit. Soon I received reports from a number of experts: Douglas Vogt, Felicito Papa, John Sampson. All of them were confirming that Obama’s alleged birth certificate was a forgery. In January of 2012 for the first time in the U.S. history I was able to issue a valid, court confirmed subpoena for the US President (or should I say someone usurping this position) to appear in court and provide his valid identification papers. Obama filed a motion to quash my subpoena. His motion was denied by a judge. Obama had to appear, however he was a no-show. It became crystal clear to everybody in the courtroom that he and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, did not show up for trial, as they have nothing to show. Obama does not have any valid identification papers. On March 1, 2012 I was fully vindicated, as sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona confirmed all of my findings, confirmed that Obama is indeed a fraud, who is using forged identification papers.
On March 9 it was announced that I qualified as a Republican candidate for the US Senate running in the primary. Recent polling by the most respectable Rasmussen-Pulse public opinion poll show me leading all of the other GOP and other challengers to California senator Diane Feinstein. While corrupt party establishment threw their support and money behind another candidate, Washington lobbyist Emken, I was getting support of the public, while the establishment puppet Emken was running dead last with only 1-2% of the vote. Of course, in our heavily rigged elections everything is possible and I would not put anything past our corrupt establishment, however so far so good, I am moving along and inching towards victory.
Shortly, on April 16 2012, 9 am I will appear before a special judge, R Kenneth Coleman in the first Circuit court in Jackson, Mississippi. This will be more than just another trip, another one of over 50 grueling trips around the country in pursuit of this case. Now I have a confirmation of all of my findings by one of the most respected sheriffs in the country. I always said: “Obama needs to win every fight of eligibility, I have to win only once”. The fight continues and I hope to win this fight soon.
For years Russians looked at the US as the beacon of Democracy and freedom. Today, in the dark days of illegitimate regime of the paperless crook Barack Hussein Obama, Americans are looking at Russians and other freedom loving people around the world and hoping for support in their struggle for freedom.
Now there are white ribbons in America. Will Russians march in solidarity with us?
To be continued…
All of the pleadings and supporting documents can be found on Dr. Taitz web page OrlyTaitzESQ.com
Comments
12 Responses to “White Ribbons in America. Article submited to English edition of Pravda”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
March 25th, 2012 @ 9:56 pm
Persistence… NEVER GIVE UP.
March 25th, 2012 @ 10:01 pm
Excellent article Dr. Taitz!
March 26th, 2012 @ 1:46 am
making the rounds on the internet:
——-
When Obuma stopped in at Master Lock in Milwaukee Wisconsin last week, he was walking the plant and stopped to talk with a plant employee and looked up at the banner hanging on the wall and said to the worker and people around him, “It is great to be in a union shop, especially one as old as this union is ” – – – – pointing to the banner.
He then said, “A Union shop since 1848” –
– – and then he went on to talk on what that banner stood for and how important it was to display it and show your union support.
The worker then said to Obuma that it was the flag of the State of Wisconsin – – which was founded in 1848. DUH!
This was only reported by a local radio station in Milwaukee (1130AM) and not by the major news networks – – – they didn’t want to embarrass this “got no clue” President!
March 26th, 2012 @ 5:12 am
Mrs. Taitz, this is my letter in the Sunday,March 25th Rapid City Journal. I was surprised they printed it…
Obama birth certificate found to be a forgery
I cannot in good conscience go without responding to “……….” March 15 reply to my letter. What Sheriff Joe Arpaio did was something no one had done: He vetted a sitting president.
And what he found out about Barack H. Obama was at least, shocking to some, a sigh of relief for others. Sheriff Arpaio investigated the birth certificate that was placed on The White House website, and shown by Barack H. Obama on a national news conference to be a Certified Copy of his Birth Certificate.
At the request of the Surprise Arizona Tea Party, Sheriff Arpaio put together a Cold Case Posse of retired police detectives and attorneys and spent six months investigating that document. All volunteers, and receiving no taxpayer money, the Cold Case Posse found that the document from the White House web page, the same one President Obama held up at his press conference was a computer-generated forgery.
So, if you could possibly tell me why Obama would need a forgery for a birth certificate, my ears are wide open.
I may be ridiculed for asking these questions, but as an American, I want to know the truth.
Thomas Scheveck
Rapid City
March 26th, 2012 @ 6:14 am
Again in (a) above: “subject to the jurisdiction of”. Mr. Obama (nor his Progeny) never have been, Constitutionally or Lawfully subject to the jurisdiction of this Country.
In order to discredit those who question his Citizenship by Decent, Obama has produced a “Certified Copy” of his Birth Certificate, which I must question for the following reasons:
a. I have never seen a Certified Copy of any official document that does not have a Seal embossed or affixed. The one Obama has shown has neither.
b. A number of Computer Graphic experts have said it is a forgery.
c. Sheriff Arpaio on Thursday unveiled preliminary results of an investigation, conducted by members of his volunteer cold-case posse, into the authenticity of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate, a controversy that has been widely debunked but which remains alive in the eyes of some conservatives. At a news conference, Arpaio said the probe revealed that there was probable cause to believe Obama’s long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April is a computer-generated forgery. He also said the selective service card completed by Obama in 1980 in Hawaii also was most likely a forgery.
d. The number of his Certificate is out of sequence with persons born after him, which again raises questions as to what, and how, such an egregious filing error could have been made, and not rectified.
e. In several prior Courts Cases the Copy has been introduced as evidence. However never the original. And the “Best Evidence Rule” has been ignored and obviated.
f. The only way to verify the Authenticity of it, and that the filing sequence is an error, is to see the original and the Microfiche Record of filing.
g. As it requires a valid certified copy of your birth certificate in order to obtain a Social Security Number, I have to question if there was a Birth Certificate available when Obama obtained the SSN he is using. It has been verified that he is using a Social Security number not assigned to him, through the Federal E-Verify System, [it was issued in the State of Connecticut to someone born in 1890].
h. His application must be checked not only to prove the number is his, but additionally show if there are problems with the Federal E-Verify System.
i. As a note of interest, Mr. Obama has an Aunt and Uncle who are Illegal Aliens residing in Massachusetts that possess, what appear to be illegally obtained SSN’s.
j. These anomalies should lead any rational and thinking person, as it does me, to question not only the authenticity but the very existence of the documents in question.
In addition further inspection of the document he displayed we find additional anomalies which need to be addressed:
1. In 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ How can the Obama ‘birth certificate’
state his Father is ‘African’ when the term wasn’t even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4,
1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. At the time of Obama’s birth, it
also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that he was born in ” Kenya, East
Africa “…This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except for the fact that Kenya did
not even exist until 1963, two years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s
birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up
and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa
Protectorate”, and/or Kenya Colony
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is
“Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the
hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and
“Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani
Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How
can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this
name had not yet been created and applied until 1978?
Quoted from the Hospitals Web Site:
:“This is the story of two hospitals: Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital and Kapi‘olani
Maternity Home: Concerned about the welfare of Hawai‘i’s mothers, Queen Kapi‘olani
held luau and bazaars to raise the $8,000 needed to open Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in
1890. In 1908, Albert and Emma Kauikeolani Wilcox donated $50,000 to start a
children’s hospital. The community, concerned that two of every seven infants in Hawai‘i
did not live to see their first birthday, rallied to match the Wilcox’s gift. A year later,
Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital opened.”
The two hospitals joined in 1978 to become Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women
& Children. Resources: https://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-child…fault.aspx
history
Kenya wasn’t Kenya: The British Empire established the East Africa Protectorate in
1895, from 1920 on it was known as the Kenya Colony. The independent Republic of
Kenya was formed in 1964, long after Obama’s Father was born, and three years after
he was born. Sources: (from Wikipedia)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenyahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
The position of President of the United States is so sensitive the entire world is
influenced, and subject to repercussions of the decisions made by the person occupying
that office. So if there is even the slightest question as to the validity of the person or to
his attachment, support, and compliance with the “Constitution and Laws of this
Country” they should be investigated immediately, to resolve the issue, for the sake of
the peace of mind of those who like me have questions and fears, and to heal a country
divided by doubt it is inherent on the Judiciary to resolve these as they are
Constitutional in nature.
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821), was a United States Supreme Court decision
most noted for John Marshall and the Court's assertion of its power to review state
supreme court decisions in criminal law matters when the plaintiff claims that their
Constitutional rights have been violated. The Court had previously asserted a similar
jurisdiction over civil cases involving American parties. Determined that court acting in a
manner repugnant to the Constitution is committing treason; that a court seizing
jurisdiction where they have none and failing to exercise jurisdiction where they
should is likewise committing treason. OF course, what would SCOTUS know?
Page 19 U. S. 404
‘’ it is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid, but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is to exercise our best judgment and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”
“With whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it
be brought before us.” …….Due Process is a constitutionally guaranteed right to the
Adjudication of questions that arise pertaining to “Civil” as well as “Constitutional Law”.
And if we are to continue as a republic based on our Constitution as well as the rule of
law we must answer each and every question posed by all that come under the
“Jurisdiction” of our Government without exception.
First Congress: FIRST CONGRESS. SESS. II. CH. 4. 1790.
ceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. And the children of such persons so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of such naturalization, Their children residing here, deemed citizens. shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, Also, children of citizens born beyond sea, &c. or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Exceptions. Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of the state in which such person was proscribed.[1]
APPROVED, March 26, 1790.
MINOR v. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 162 (1874): The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court, ———– provides that 'no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,'7 and that Congress shall have power 'to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.' Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Rogers v. Bellei – 401 U.S. 815 (1971)
The very first Congress, at its Second Session, proceeded to implement its power, under the Constitution's Art. I, § 8, cl. 4, to "establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization" by producing the Act of March 26, 1790, 1 Stat. 103. That statute, among other things, stated," And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United
States. . . ."
110th CONGRESS 2d Session S. RES. 511
Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 10, 2008
Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen': (First Congress: FIRST CONGRESS. SESS. II. CH. 4. 1790."…children of CITIZENS of the United States…shall be considered as natural born citizens of the United States; Provided That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States…" added for emphasis)
Respectfully
William F. Reade, Jr.
March 26th, 2012 @ 8:39 am
The color White as an International Code of surrender… We have not Surrendered… Pick another Color. I recommend Blue…
March 26th, 2012 @ 11:53 am
Orly:…the color(s) I select are: “RED, WHITE, AND BLUE!!!” And Americans NEVER, EVER surrender! And boy, does he NOT have any idea as to what he’s talkin’ about!
March 26th, 2012 @ 12:53 pm
I agree with Fist ‘n Cuffs. White is surrender. Try plaid.
March 26th, 2012 @ 6:11 pm
Try pink and blue…
March 26th, 2012 @ 9:34 pm
I go for red, white and blue. I think your campaign slogan should be Lakins’ “The Truth Matters.” Recently, I am hearing Snopes quoted as a “repository of truth”…you need to add this to your arsenal…naming of the “false sources” and who is behind them. Acorn backed by Soros, Snopes, Factcheck, etc. Subpoena Snopes and Factchek into court personnel. Subpoena Dr. Lakin, and or get video testimony asking him to explain why he would rather forfeit a successful career than serve a false president illegally seated. Many many people are not aware of Lakin. Bring attention to Commander Kerchner and Attorney Apuzzo. Many are not aware of other efforts. They think you are the Lone Ranger. Mention World Net Daily and their billboard campaign, which shows that Judge Land’s frivolous and shallow statements are misinformed and misleading, when he says the issue has been settled. People have spent fortunes because the issue is far from settled. Appeal to the judge does he/she want to be remembered for betraying their own children and family, by succumbing to political pressure and turning their own court into a kangaroo court, while sending off young people to die in foreign lands, if they themselves will not stand on their own soil and stand for justice and truth. Fire up their sense of duty and loyalty to their family and their fellow citizens, and do not be intimated by powers or death…God will vindicate them. Do not roll over so easy to political pressures and turn the court into a political arena, rather than an arena of justice, wearing the blindfold, so as to be fair to all parties, regardless of wealth, race, or gender. God bless America!
“I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” – Patrick Henry.
March 26th, 2012 @ 10:03 pm
When you get your periodic social security updates and retirement benefits, it shows all employment in your past with salary. Obama claims to have worked at Baskin Robbins. This would be in the Social Security System and Baskin Robbins, would probably have this information, if true. Taxes would have been paid to the State of Hawaii for that period of employment. I doubt he worked there, but made it up as an “all american boy” story. But FOIA for proof of employment and proof of taxes could be requested, perhaps. He claims to have worked at some magazine after Columbia. This should also be on the SS# record and the state of New York should have tax records of state taxes being paid by Obama and his employer. Just some ideas, not sure how good. Illinois is another state with state taxes he should have paid as a “community organizer” teacher and Senator. Requesting state tax records might help.
March 26th, 2012 @ 11:18 pm
FOIA applies to governmental records, Baskin Robbins is not part of the government. We need to find one honest judge. When we find one, we can get any records