OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

We need alternative media. Everyone is sick of puppets on both right and left. I need citizen reporters and cameramen to start providing regular weekly and later daily news reports on IP TV and YouTube. People are done with the corporate media, rigged elections and corrupt puppets in the government, Congress and Senate.

Posted on | February 19, 2010 | No Comments

I have censored the name of my friend.  This is NOT of my pen but I thought
he hits the nail on the head in a way I can not.  I don’t think Glenn Geeck and
Bill Oh’Really fully understand the numbers of people who feel the way we do.
I think we use to be referred to as the “Silent Majority”.  But we normally speak
only when we vote.  And vote this year……..we will.
 

Rogue Scholar

Tom Nadeau

Jacksonville, FL


                                                                                                                      RADICAL – NO 

CONCERNED CITIZEN – YES

 

Date: February 19, 2010

 

From: L. F.

         

       

 

 

For: Mr. Glenn Beck

 

I respectfully disagree with your characterization of Birthers and Tea Party members as extremists who must be ignored in the political arena.  I have watched your program sporadically and appreciate your attempt to educate our citizens of the dangers we face.  Unfortunately on Thursday February 18, 2010 you allowed your rhetoric to overrun the bounds of decency.  I thought for a minute I was listening to Barack Obama doing a voice-over of your show or you were reading from material published by the Department of Homeland Security.  When I realized it was you talking and you were serious I turned the channel back to classical music and relaxed while my wife cooked dinner.

 

For all of my professional life I have carried a copy of the Constitution in my briefcase and kept another copy along with the Federalist Papers on my desk.  I have taught American Government at the college level.  I have a Masters Degree in History and am a proud graduate of the United States Army War College.  My wife started her professional career as an elementary school teacher and retired as a Director of Special Education.  Our two sons are Military Officers and our daughter is a Detective for the State of Maine.  All have Graduate Degrees.  I offer this information only to point out that we are not mind-numbed followers of anybody, but rather successful people who are accustomed to making decisions based on facts not emotions.

 

First the Birther issue.  As a History major I was taught to use original source material for developing any thesis or point to be discussed.  After reading most of the legal briefs and researching the law I have come to the conclusion that there is enough evidence to warrant a clarification of Barack Obama’s qualification under the Constitution.  Interestingly nobody raised any major concern when John McCain’s eligibility was questioned.  This issue goes to the very heart of the argument that you have been consistently raising – is the original Constitution to be followed or is it a living document to be adjusted according to the needs of the moment?  I have undergone numerous background investigations in my professional life and have always had to produce original documents.  We live one mile from the Canadian border.  My 10-year old granddaughter plays in a Youth Hockey League and most of her games are in Canada.  She, along with everyone else in the family had to produce stamped original copies of our birth certificates, along with other documentation, in order to get passports to go to the games.  There is no Constitutional requirement for young hockey players to prove they are actual citizens, yet under the law they must.  On the other hand there is a Constitutional requirement to be met in order to be eligible to be President of the United States.  Under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI Clause 2) the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  Will it or will it not be followed?  Secondly, where is the equality under the law if a 10-year must produce certified documents while the President can refuse to comply with the very document he took an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” (Article II Section 1 Clause 7)?   

 

As for the Tea Party issue, I find your position to be inconsistent.  First you chastised Time Magazine for not including any mention of the movement in their year-end edition.  Now the Tea Party members are characterized as fringe extremists who, according to your statements, the political leaders should not “surround” themselves with.  Either the movement is important or it isn’t.  You can’t logically argue that the Tea Party movement should be included in Time Magazine and then counter that by arguing that the major political leaders should ignore the Tea Party members.  From my perspective the Tea Party movement provides a perfectly legitimate opportunity for concerned citizens to vent their frustrations within the realm of politics.  The polls continually show that voters are dissatisfied with the current politicians.  Given the current political volatility it is better to allow public dissent than to marginalize it.  If you don’t allow the steam to escape from a boiling pot it may eventually explode – that is the last thing I want to see happen to this country.  Belittling and excluding those who may express contrary views does nothing to increase the level of cooperation or understanding of all involved, it only leads to more frustration and ultimately increases the polarization of the country.  For the record I am not a Tea Party member and I have never attended any of their functions.  I simply argue the point because I believe all voices, excluding those who expressly incite violence, racism or treason, should be heard and then the voters can make an informed decision.

Category: Latest News, Letters/Feedback from Readers

Comments

Leave a Reply