38 Responses to “Very important, I need your help”

1. Yephora
   January 5th, 2011 @ 10:08 pm

   If you are speaking of the line that begins with the letters DB, it looks like “071562” – July 15, 1962.

2. Ed
   January 6th, 2011 @ 5:02 am

   If I’m looking at the correct photo ( the last one) I see 3/63 or 3/65 penciledin,in the lower righthand of the document. Is that where you are saying is a bit foggy??

3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   January 6th, 2011 @ 5:04 am

   No, I am looking for the date, when the application was sent to the SocialSecurity administration

4. Yephora
   January 6th, 2011 @ 6:01 am

   Orly, you wrote:

   “You can see that the application for Lucille Ballantyne was made in 1959, even though she was born in 1912.”

   The application you posted for Lucille Ballantyne reads “TODAY’S DATE Sept. 11, 1954” handwritten in the lower left hand corner. Where are you seeing 1959? I don’t see that date anywhere in the application.

   You further wrote: “Below the actual application is a computer printout, called numident, and you can see correspondent date 8/1959.”

   Again, where are you seeing that date? There are only two dates on the printout:

   “NUMI DTE: 12/02/10” and

   “INTERNAL . . . 09/XX/1954”

   Possibly, on the first line, is a third date: “REC (received, or recorded] 2010336 [year 2010, the 336th day].”

   I don’t see 1959 anywhere in the printout.

   —

   As for Thomas Woods, could you please direct us to the line or section where to look for the date when the application was sent to the Social Security Administration. Is it one of the handwritten figures?

5. Linda
   January 6th, 2011 @ 6:09 am

   I have been delving into my own family history and in looking for info on Thomas Wood, I immediately went to the LDS Genealogy site. Their Social Security Death Index lists him as born in 1977 and dying in 1981. The SS# is the same. Still, if he died in 1981, that number,042-68-4424, was/is listed as belonging to Thomas Wood. Here is the link to what I found.

   https://www.familysearch.org/s/recordDetails/show?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpilot.familysearch.org%2Frecords%2Ftrk%3A%2Ffsrs%2Frr_1855358000%2Fp1&hash=HloWXpZgU9zB10k5M56iYku8TUc%253D

6. Linda
   January 6th, 2011 @ 6:21 am

   Keep looking at the LDS Website as there are several Thomas Wood’s in CT.

7. Linda
   January 6th, 2011 @ 6:22 am

   Here is the link to the LDS Website listing all the Thomas Wood’s.

   https://www.familysearch.org/s/search/index/record-search#searchType=records&filtered=true&fed=true&collectionId=1202535&advanced=true&givenName=Thomas+Louis&surname=Wood&eventLocation=CT&eventYearFrom=1850&eventYearTo=1981

8. Fiona Bond
   January 6th, 2011 @ 7:40 am

   Orly, did you check for field 13 at the bottom left of the form, labelled ‘Todays Date’ ?

9. jcf
   January 6th, 2011 @ 7:42 am

   ’95 and I cannot make out the numbers prior to those.

10. 68Truthseeker
    January 6th, 2011 @ 8:02 am

    Steve Malzberg Interviews Jeff Kuhner – If The Truth Got Out About Obama There Would Be A Civil War

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWuM0tzrOYs

11. WD
    January 6th, 2011 @ 8:05 am

    Orly, you’ve got your dates muddled up on Lucille Ballantyne – it’s 1954 not 1959.

12. Ro
    January 6th, 2011 @ 8:53 am

    FM -SSADO could be Soc Sec Admin Office-City is New
    Britain, Ct
    To_SSA EIB ? Baltimore, MD
    DON-New Britain, CT
    TP Orig
    DB Date of Birth 7/15/?2
    PB Place of birth New Britain, CT
    SX Male
    RC Race White
    MN-Mother
    FN-Father
    MA 25 Glenview Drive, Newington, CT

    Soc Sec office in Norwalk, CT and all of these towns are very near each other.

    Did you know Rahm Emanual lived in a house owned by Rosa DeLaura in or near New Haven, CT?
    Just saying? Might be connection.

13. Judy Chambers
    January 6th, 2011 @ 11:42 am

    Orly, this is very confusing to me. You state that the application of Ms Ballintyne is 8/1959. The date I see is 9/1954. Unless there is something else missing here the supposed numident below her application is not even similiar to the numident for Mr. Wood.

14. Bessie Fuselier
    January 6th, 2011 @ 12:19 pm

    you people need to stop social security administration, should not be showing personal information of someone social security to the public with the identify fraud that is going on.OBAMA is the President of the United States and there is nothing no one can do about it he was official sworing in and elected, the people of the Unites States spoke. LET IT DIE

15. Publius Huldah
    January 6th, 2011 @ 12:20 pm

    Dear Orly,

    I’m not familiar with these forms, and hence don’t know what the letters on the far left of the form stand for. Which group of letters signifies the date when the application was sent to SSA?

    Or is the date included in the number which is printed “sideways” on the right side of the form?

    Or is it someplace else? If you will direct us to the place to look, it will help. Highest Regards, PH

16. WD
    January 6th, 2011 @ 12:48 pm

    Just noticed I mistyped my email address in creating my last post – I don’t know if you validate the email addresses but if you do: apologies.

17. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 6th, 2011 @ 12:52 pm

    no, the date he applied. He died in 81, it cannot be 95. It should be 1976-1977

18. Ro
    January 6th, 2011 @ 1:22 pm

    Bessie, the o42 number was used to file his income tax and that is public knowledge; one thing he can’t hide!

19. ch
    January 6th, 2011 @ 4:59 pm

    Did they deliberately choose a 9/11 application, to match their target date?

20. Flo Benson
    January 6th, 2011 @ 5:14 pm

    Dr. Orly, you said, “Just like Lucille Ballantyne, this individual did not apply until the old age, when there was a need for SS benefits.”

    However, according to the SS application you posted for Ms. Ballantyne, she was 41 years old when she filled out that SS application in 1954.

    If 41 is “old age” then I’m positively ancient at 43, and at your age (older than me) you are…?

21. Ro
    January 6th, 2011 @ 7:11 pm

    Are we looking in the wrong place? The form says at the bottom to return to the nearest social security office. Wouldn’t that be somewhere near Lamoni, IOWA?

22. Ro
    January 6th, 2011 @ 7:11 pm

    Are we looking in the wrong place? The form says at the bottom to return to the nearest social security office. Wouldn’t that be somewhere near Lamoni, IOWA? I O W A

23. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 6th, 2011 @ 10:47 pm

    what do you mean

24. hippybiker
    January 7th, 2011 @ 6:15 am

    ObamaTron Bessie should learn how to compose a sentence, as well as a simple paragraph. If this is an example of the kind of people who voted for the usurper; we are truly doomed.

25. West Coast Carl
    January 7th, 2011 @ 7:27 am

    Dr. Taitz you asked for help and the people here are trying to help you, so why don’t you answer their questions??

26. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    January 7th, 2011 @ 7:28 am

    I answered all the questions 10 times already

27. Paula Hoehn
    January 7th, 2011 @ 10:27 am

    Re: #20, Flo Benson

    Comment: “Dr. Orly, you said, “Just like Lucille Ballantyne, this individual did not apply until the old age, when there was a need for SS benefits.”

    Answer: I believe Dr. Orly was referring to either of these 2 deceased individuals, whose SS-5’s were not shown:

    MARGARET BOSSING, SSN 042-68-4437, Appl Date: Feb 14, 1977, age at application: 81

    ANTOINETTE DEMO, SSN 042-68-9248, Appl Date: Mar 5, 1977, age at application: 86

    Paula Hoehn

28. Starla
    January 7th, 2011 @ 12:43 pm

    HERE IS AN EXCELLENT COMMENT. I hope you post this on your web site so all Americans get read this!

    From: https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/john-boehner-call-me-call-john-boehner-us-constitution-natural-born-citizen-you-just-took-the-oath-you-just-read-the-us-constitution/#comments

    itooktheredpill | January 7, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    QUESTIONS FOR SPEAKER BOEHNER:

    [AND ALL PERSONS IN THE 112th CONGRESS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON D.C., ALL ATTORNEY GENERALS IN EVERY STATE, ALL ASSISTENT STATE ATTORNEY’S IN THE USA, THE USA IMMIGRATION DEPT. OFFICIALS, THE DOJ, ALL STATE GOVERNORS, ALL STATE LT. GOVERNOR’S, ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT SHERIFF’S & POLICE OFFICER’S ENFORCING THE LAWS, ALL ATTORNEY’S, ALL PROSECUTORS IN THE USA, ALL OF THE USA JUDGES IN THE JUDICIARY, ALL ANTI-TERRORIST OFFICERS IN THE USA, ALL USA MILITARY, ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION OFFICERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ALL STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICERS, ALL USA MILITARY:]

    1) Do you honor your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States?

    2) Do you honor the rule of law?

    3) Do you support the enforcement of current Immigration law?

    4) Do you know that the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires that:

    All employees, citizens and noncitizens, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States must complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

    5) Is there any exception made in that law for any occupation, including President?

    6) Is Obama an employee, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States?

    7) Do you know whether or not Obama is in compliance with current Immigration law? Do you know whether or not Obama has completed a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, and if so, what documents he used as proof of his employment eligibilty?

    8) Do you realize that the Form I-9 is very specific about what documents are acceptable?

    9) Do you realize that when you said:

    “The state of Hawaii has said that President Obama was born there,” Boehner said. “That’s good enough for me.”

    … you are accepting as evidence something that is not accepted as evidence for a Form I-9?

    10) Do you agree that the President is not above the law, and that Obama should publicly release original, initial documentation, certified by the appropriate government agency, to meet the requirements of not only the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 but also the United States Constitution?

    # # # #

29. Starla
    January 7th, 2011 @ 12:44 pm

    HERE IS AN EXCELLENT COMMENT. I hope you post this on your web site so all Americans can read this!

    From: https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/john-boehner-call-me-call-john-boehner-us-constitution-natural-born-citizen-you-just-took-the-oath-you-just-read-the-us-constitution/#comments

    itooktheredpill | January 7, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    QUESTIONS FOR SPEAKER BOEHNER:

    [AND ALL PERSONS IN THE 112th CONGRESS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON D.C., ALL ATTORNEY GENERALS IN EVERY STATE, ALL ASSISTENT STATE ATTORNEY’S IN THE USA, THE USA IMMIGRATION DEPT. OFFICIALS, THE DOJ, ALL STATE GOVERNORS, ALL STATE LT. GOVERNOR’S, ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT SHERIFF’S & POLICE OFFICER’S ENFORCING THE LAWS, ALL ATTORNEY’S, ALL PROSECUTORS IN THE USA, ALL OF THE USA JUDGES IN THE JUDICIARY, ALL ANTI-TERRORIST OFFICERS IN THE USA, ALL USA MILITARY, ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION OFFICERS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ALL STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICERS, ALL USA MILITARY:]

    1) Do you honor your oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States?

    2) Do you honor the rule of law?

    3) Do you support the enforcement of current Immigration law?

    4) Do you know that the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires that:

    All employees, citizens and noncitizens, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States must complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

    5) Is there any exception made in that law for any occupation, including President?

    6) Is Obama an employee, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States?

    7) Do you know whether or not Obama is in compliance with current Immigration law? Do you know whether or not Obama has completed a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, and if so, what documents he used as proof of his employment eligibilty?

    8) Do you realize that the Form I-9 is very specific about what documents are acceptable?

    9) Do you realize that when you said:

    “The state of Hawaii has said that President Obama was born there,” Boehner said. “That’s good enough for me.”

    … you are accepting as evidence something that is not accepted as evidence for a Form I-9?

    10) Do you agree that the President is not above the law, and that Obama should publicly release original, initial documentation, certified by the appropriate government agency, to meet the requirements of not only the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 but also the United States Constitution?

    # # # #

30. Ro
    January 7th, 2011 @ 1:50 pm

    Why was this application signed as Mrs. Clay Ballantyne. Why wouldn’t this person sign as Mrs. Harry Ballantyne. Clear indication someone other than family member applied. I just have a feeling that it is not a woman’s signature. I’m very intuitive and usually right.

31. Michael
    January 7th, 2011 @ 2:10 pm

    Here’s a link to death records in Danbury, CT with entries starting around 1970

    https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?rank=1&new=1&MSAV=0&msT=1&gss=angs-c&msdpn__ftp=Danbury%2c+Fairfield%2c+Connecticut%2c+USA&msdpn=60&msdpn_PInfo=8-|1652393|2|3242|9|1000|60|&uidh=000&=b%2cd%2cr%2cg%2ca%2ci%2cy%2c0&gl=34&gst=&ghc=20&fh=540&fsk=BEHpYewIgAAEJwAAS1c-61-&pgoff=11

32. Michael
    January 7th, 2011 @ 3:04 pm

    Here’s a link to a list of those born 1890 and died in Danbury CT in 1977.

    There is still 1978 – 1981 to do.

    https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=ct1949-96&rank=1&new=1&MSAV=0&msT=1&gss=angs-d&msbdy=1890&msddy=1977&msdpn__ftp=Danbury%2c+Fairfield%2c+Connecticut%2c+USA&msdpn=60&msdpn_PInfo=8-|1652393|2|3242|9|1000|60|&dbOnly=_83004005|_83004005_x&uidh=000&=b%2cd%2cr%2c0&gl=&gst=

33. truthbetold11
    January 7th, 2011 @ 7:05 pm

    Strange how her printing looks 3rd grade and her signature looks ivy league

34. MinutemanCDC_SC
    January 7th, 2011 @ 8:36 pm

    https://img276.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=58451_Numident_Thomas_Wood_date_3_67_122_146lo.jpg
    The above image magnifies the “3/67” at the lower right of the Thomas Louis Wood numident. It is plainly not “3/77”, which one might surmise without magnification.

    In the lower left corner, below “RM REPLY ATTN. MRS WELLIN”, there are some characters, but no “76” or “77”, as I read it.

    The only “77” I see is at the beginning of the number on the right margin. If you can find a “77” year anywhere on this numident, you have better eyes than Eye.
    __________________________________

    Ro, Mrs. Clay Ballantyne (good old Lutheran name) signed with her husband’s name.

    Her father’s name was Harry Clay Barnett.

    Both were named Clay. Only one was named Ballantyne, and he was NOT named Harry.

35. Politijabber
    January 8th, 2011 @ 8:12 am

    Ro asks, “Why was this application signed as Mrs. Clay Ballantyne. Why wouldn’t this person sign as Mrs. Harry Ballantyne.”

    Because she was married to Clay Harold Ballantyne. Duh.

36. Starla
    January 8th, 2011 @ 1:14 pm

    MUST READ EXCELLENT ARTICLE!! PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE FAR & WIDE!!

    From: https://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/democrats-and-media-fearful-of-obama-eligibility/

    “DEMS & MEDIA FEAR CIVIL WAR FROM OBAMA ELIGIBILITY”

    By Eowyn
    January 4, 2011

    Excerpt:

    “In a remarkable radio interview with Steve Malzberg on December 30, 2010, Jeff Kuhner of the Washington Times says that people around the White House, Democratic circles, and the liberal media – including senior top editors — all know there’s something there about Obama’s birth eligibility but are afraid to pursue the matter.

    (snip)

    The topic of Obama’s birth certificate begins at the 3:52 mark in the audio. Here’s the gist of what he said:

    “They” know there’s a problem: Beginning at the 5:18 mark, Kuhner says: “I’m choosing my words now very carefully because I don’t want to burn my sources. People around the White House and especially in Democratic circles, in private at a cocktail party, at a restaurant, will tell you ‘Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.’ They don’t know what it is. Even some liberal members of the media I’ve spoken to off the record have said, ‘Jeff, we don’t want to touch this story because we know there’s something there. We don’t know what: We don’t know if it’s going to reveal his religion that was given to him by his father or stepfather; we don’t know if it’s records that will eventually come out about his travels to Pakistan when he was a student at a university; we don’t know if he applied for foreign aid as a foreign student. We don’t know exactly what it is, but the reluctance of the White House on not just his birth certificate, but his health records, school records. They are hiding something, there’s no question about it.’ And the only question is how bad the damage is going to be. If, and I emphasize if, it turns out that he was not born in the United States, we have a legal, constitutional and political crisis without precedent in this nation.”

    Read The Excellent Article & See The Video Here:

    https://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/democrats-and-media-fearful-of-obama-eligibility/

37. Crystal
    January 9th, 2011 @ 10:49 am

    George W. Bush was also born in Connecticut. I tried to find his SS number to compare to BHOs, but couldn’t find it. Maybe someone else could? Crazy thought, but I wonder if there is a connection?

38. my blog
    November 22nd, 2011 @ 11:49 am

    Wonderful post but I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Thank you!

Leave a Reply