US HAS A DUTY TO RE-SUPPLY UKRAINE’S BOMBERS AND CRUISE MISSILES IT PRESSURED UKRAINE TO GIVE UP AND DESTROY BETWEEN 1991-2014 AND PEACE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE IS POSSIBLE
Posted on | March 10, 2022 | 5 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
- 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7693
orly.taitz@gmail.com
03.09.2022
US HAS A DUTY TO RE-SUPPLY UKRAINE’S BOMBERS AND CRUISE MISSILES IT PRESSURED UKRAINE TO GIVE UP AND DESTROY BETWEEN 1991-2014 AND PEACE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE IS POSSIBLE
From 1991-2014 US has applied pressure on Ukraine to give up and destroy all of its bombers and air launched cruise missiles.
In 1991 US, Russia and Ukraine signed Start 1 treaty, where Ukraine agreed not only to give up its nuclear weapons, which it transferred to Russia, but also to give up delivery systems, such as bombers and cruise missiles.
ArmsControls.org reported “After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine agreed to rid itself of the nuclear weapons left on its soil by joining the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear-weapon state and by becoming a START I party. In June 1996, Kiev announced that the last of its estimated 3,000 tactical and 2,000 strategic nuclear warheads had been transferred to Russia.
Since 1997, under the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program, the United States has assisted Ukraine with dismantling remaining heavy bombers, strategic air-launched cruise missiles, and ICBMs and associated silos and launch-control centers.
The CTR program will also help Ukraine eliminate its Tu-22M Backfire bombers, Tu-134 combat trainers, and Kh-22 air-launched cruise missiles. According to Defense Threat Reduction Agency spokesman Bob Bennett, although these weapons systems are not covered by the START agreement, given their capabilities, the United States feels it is “advantageous” to assist Ukraine with their dismantlement. CTR efforts in Ukraine are expected to be concluded by 2007″
If US were not to pressure Ukraine to give up all of its bombers and cruise missiles, Putin might have thought twice before invading Ukraine, and if he were to invade, Ukraine could use its bombers and cruise missiles to destroy Putin’s convoys at the border, they likely would not have advanced to the heavily populated areas of Kyiv, Kharkov and Mariupol.
Because US pressured Ukraine to give up those weapons, it has a duty and a moral obligation to re-supply them. If we do not re-supply Ukraine, our word, the full faith and credit of the US government will have zero value in international arena. No state, business or individual would trust us anymore.
Furthermore, while some parties appear to be interested in a lengthy war, the people of Ukraine and Russia, and the international community will benefit from a quick resolution of this conflict.
Supply of bombers, cruise missiles and MIGs to Ukraine can actually be a deterrent and a catalyst for Putin to soften his stand in cease fire and peace negotiations and diplomatic resolution can and will be found.
Putin presented Zelensky with four demands: end of fighting, Ukraine agreeing not to join NATO, Ukraine recognizing independence of Donetsk and Lugansk republics and recognition of Crimea as part of Russia.
First condition, end of fighting. Zelensky is willing to end fighting, provided that Russia does the same and withdraws its troops. This is doable
Second condition. Ukraine is currently not a member of NATO and Zelensky stated that he is willing to consider making such an agreement as he feels that NATO itself is not willing to expand to such a hot spot as Ukraine.
Third condition- Recognition of Lugansk and Donetsk republics. Zelensky stated that he is considering it. Russia claims that some 13,000 ethnic Russian, including some 500 children, were killed in the last few years in Donbas region by Ukrainian nationalists. Regardless of whether these numbers are correct or inflated, there are diplomatic solutions. For example, UN can step in and UN peace keeping forces can be deployed in Donbas region to diffuse the situation and end fighting between ethnic Russians and ethnic Ukrainians in the region.
Lastly, the fourth condition, is probably the toughest, demand for Ukraine to recognize Crimea as part of Russia. Crimean peninsula has a population of about 2 million people. 65% of Crimeans are ethnic Russians, the rest are half Crimean Tatars and half Ukrainians.
Russia claims that Crimea belongs to it, that Russian empire won Crimea in Russian-Turkish war in 1783, nearly 250 years ago. In 1954, when both Russia and Ukraine were a part of the Soviet Union, Nkita Khrushev, an ethnic Ukrainian Soviet leader, made a non-binding declaration, pronouncing Crimea to be a part of Ukraine. In 2014, when Ukraine became a Western ally, the people of Crimea held a referendum, where allegedly some 95% voted to succeed from Ukraine and join Russian Federation.
Ukraine believes Crimea to be a part of Ukraine and it questions the results of the Crimean referendum.
So, what is the diplomatic solution out of this quagmire?
I believe that both Russia and Ukraine will agree to another referendum in Crimea to be observed by Russians, Ukrainians and UN. Russia will agree to this referendum, as it will bet that majority of ethnic Russians will vote to stay in Russian Federation. Ukraine might agree to the referendum in order to find a diplomatic and democratic end to the war. Additionally, Ukraine will bet that even ethnic Russians might vote to succeed from Russia due to their desire to live in more democratic and prosperous West. There is an additional advantage to Ukraine, if the border conflicts are settled and borders are agreed upon, EU might be willing to accept Ukraine. Currently, one of EU’s hesitations, is lack of clear borders. Joining EU will help economic development of Ukraine.
Peaceful referendums work. Recently, in a peaceful referendum, the people of Great Britain voted to leave the European Union. People of Puerto Rico voted twice to remain in the US, as a territory. I believe that a referendum in Crimea, observed by Russia, Ukraine and EU might provide the final resolution of the last sticking point in Russian -Ukrainian peace negotiations.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Tags: Bombers > Crimea Donbas > Cruise missile > Dr. Orly Taitz > Referendum Crimea > Russian Ukrainian War > START 1 treaty > UN
Comments
5 Responses to “US HAS A DUTY TO RE-SUPPLY UKRAINE’S BOMBERS AND CRUISE MISSILES IT PRESSURED UKRAINE TO GIVE UP AND DESTROY BETWEEN 1991-2014 AND PEACE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE IS POSSIBLE”
Leave a Reply
March 10th, 2022 @ 3:22 pm
I do not know who will listen to your (and my) suggestions for the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, however I think your suggestions are grossly biased in favor of Russia’s demands.
To begin with, the justice and international norms do not even afford Russia a right to demand anything! Russia committed an unmotivated aggression and war! It must be judged rather than extend demands!
However, if to follow your way of compromise and appeasement of an aggressor (just to avoid escalation of the war), in my view the only point of compromise may be Crimea, which was really assigned to Ukraine by redistricting in the time of Khruschchev.
Donbass was a part of Ukraine since Ukraine is on the map.
Forcing Ukraine (or any other nations) to not enter into treaties is humiliating and baseless – especially if it is forced by a fascist Russia.
On the contrary, it is Ukraine which must demand compensation for all the damages and losses caused by Russia’s aggression.
See the basics about this war here: https://judeochristianamerica.org/AggressionForDummies.htm
March 12th, 2022 @ 9:05 am
These people are a joke. The same ones that were willing to attempt a coup on a sitting U.S. president, duly elected and the people who stole an election now don’t have the guts and the moral fortitude to stand against a true tyrant! It’s a fact that no one is disputing(Bob and Jim), that we offered protection to Ukraine for their disarmament from nuclear weapons, who went to Russia, by the way. Now they stand in front of the cameras and basically said they don’t want to offend Putin by sending the Polish airplanes to Ukraine. We need to really weed out the bad seeds all the way from the top to the guy that cleans the toilets if they were hired by any demorat and that includes the military, CIA, FBI, DOJ, Homeland Security and any and every intelligence agency we own. All these federal agencies that were created to SERVE the people have turned into agencies dedicated to destroy it’s citizens. Those who work for these agencies are nothing more than traitors and should be hung, no exceptions! You don’t have to follow unlawful orders so there are no excuses!
March 12th, 2022 @ 11:13 am
Oh dear, Taino is off his meds again. Seriously, you think Trump would stand up to Putin. He rolled over at Helsinki. Now that is treason.
March 12th, 2022 @ 5:37 pm
Hey, Jim, What’s wrong with your brain?
Taino21 is no dummy, you are…!!~~~
March 13th, 2022 @ 10:16 am
JJ boy, Oh dear! Seriously, why Putin didn’t invade Ukrain while Trump was President? Are you ignoring the facts, evidence and the truth? Prove one thing I said is wrong! See, it’s always the same with you guys, when you cant win an argument on the merits you deflect. By the way every thing that Trump said in Helsinki has been proven true. Remember when the Germans were laughing at Trump when he told the world if you guys took over gas prices were going to hit $7.00. Who’s laughing now? It seems you need to get a prescription from your doctor so he can put you on a daily dose of reality, you need it!