OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Update regarding Lt. Col Lakin

Posted on | October 25, 2010 | 3 Comments

thanks for helping col lakin.

         
 
Inbox
   X  
         

    

 

Reply

 

|

alex rynkiewicz

 to me
show details 4:37 PM (2 minutes ago)
  
ms taitz     i went to wash dc bergs rally but only 50 people there— i cancelled my membership in the scranton tea party because they refused to get any buses to washdc.   i am now contacting margaret hemenway to see if she knows of your offer to help.  thanks again
Answer from Orly:
I wrote to Margaret Hemenway (Lakin’s public relations person ), to Lakin and to General Vallely. I offered to help. Currently I filed with the Supreme Court a petition for writ of Certiorari, which deals with Capt Dr.  Connie Rhodes case (also a flight surgeon) and Major Cook’s case.( see PDF below).  I believe, that Lakin’s attorneys need to file an Amicus Brief with the Supreme Court in that case, as I already provided the court with a letter from Captain James Crawford, legal counsel for Admiral Mulin, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff. The letter states, that they are concerned about this issue, they are forwarding it to the litigation counsel, but they don’t believe, that they can do anything, because Commander in Chief is a civilian. It shows, that on behalf of my clients I reached the highest echelons of power in the military and exosted all administrative remedies. Now, it is up to the court to decide. The courts have to provide a venue for both Lakin and my clients and for me. In my case judge Land did not state that there is no standing, he ruled on abstention, stating that he does not want to get into the affairs of the military. On the other hand the military is saying that they cannot do anything, because Obama is a civilian. This is a classic case, where higher courts, specifically the Supreme Court of the United States needs to intervene and resolve this impasse, this conundrum between the military courts and the Federal courts. I will be happy to testify at Lakin’s trial, if his attorneys want me to testify and will be happy to help in  any way I can. I was persecuted, I was punished with $20,000 sanctions for daring to bring a case agains a sitting president. I can really appreciate, what Lakin is going through. I consider Lt. Col Lakin a great American Hero and he deserves all the help, that he can get. God bless him. 
Orly    
Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Letters/Feedback from Readers

Comments

3 Responses to “Update regarding Lt. Col Lakin”

  1. Phil Smitheryl
    October 26th, 2010 @ 9:59 am

    > stating that he does not want to get into the affairs of the military

    That’s not his personal preference, that’s how the judicial system has handled their relation to the military for decades. As a lawyer you should know this.

    > conundrum between the military courts and the Federal courts

    There is no conundrum as neither part is constitutionally authorized to do what you’re aiming at (impeaching the President). That is for Congress alone. As a lawyer, you should know that.

    > I consider Lt. Col Lakin a great American Hero

    Will you continue to do that even if he drops the birther defense and the “Obama show us your records” defense?

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 26th, 2010 @ 10:48 am

    He cannot get involved only, if it is a technical matter. Legitimacy of Obama is not a technical matter. I am not telling the court to impeach Obama

  3. Spaulding
    October 27th, 2010 @ 12:05 am

    Dr. Taitz your praise for Dr. Lakin will force me to reappraise his intentions. Inspired by your clear statement at the press conference following Mr. Berg in December of 2008, that Obama’s birth to an alien father violated the Constitution, I began reading original sources and now consider the truth of your statement the litmus test. Of course Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo have explored the issue thoroughly, and you all concur. Dr. Lakin’s legal team assiduously avoids that clear doctrine in public statements and on his web site, as does Mr. Berg.

    There has been a remarkable disinforation campaign and Mr. Berg has only contributed to the confusion by filing a case with no evidence, an action which provided precedence to the dismissal of cases to follow his. I have suspected Dr. Lakin as well of carrying a false flag. Berg’s role was to demonstrate the futility of questioning Obama’s eligibility. Berg pops up every once in a while to continue to confirm the futility of pursuing consitutional ineligibility, such as his recent “rally” to demonstrate how few people really care about the issue.

    Berg is a Hillary operative, and his legal activity resulted not only in muddying the waters, but, probably not coincidentally, in wasting your time and energy. He was an assistant attorney general. He has achieved his mission. Perhaps there is another side to Dr. Lakin’s having completely ignored Obama’s admission that he was born a British Citizen, and that he was a “Native born citizen of the U.S.,” a term which, by Wong Kim Ark, is not equivalent to a natural born citizen. Dr. Lakin needed no other evidence. What both Berg and Dr. Lakin have done is to confirm Obama, and Sunstein, and Axelrod, and Murkowski’s perception that the Constitution is a “living document,” not to be taken literally since it was written in another century.

    Getting “standing” is, I know, another issue, but Dr Lakin’s rank and service might have opened the door if he had demanded that the court confirm the law, The Constitution, already in evidence. Did not Dr. Lakin just preempt a properly framed case? I hope I am wrong, but I’ll trust the wisdom of James Madison or Alexander Hamilton, or George Washington, or John Jay, all of whom asserted that Vattel’s Law of Nations was the document which most guided their creation both of the Declaration and The Constitution. They insisted on a natural born citizen because he or she was most likely to inherit the allegiance of his parents. If his parents were citizens, they pledged to a Constitution, and not a monarch – laws and not men. Dr. Lakin and Mr. Berg ignore jus sanguinis, while even Patrick Leahy, Clair McCaskill and Michael Chertoff, in their Senate Resolution 511, decided that two citizen parents were sufficient to make McCain a natural born citizen. And yes, Obama signed SenRes 511. But he knew he would be protected, by both parties, which had tacitally agreed that this time, the Constitution was a living document.

Leave a Reply