Update on challenges around the country
Posted on | February 11, 2012 | 22 Comments
a couple of my supporters filed challenges in MA and PA. So far the Secretaries of State are non-responsive. Will keep you updated.
so far I filed challenges in NH, HI, GA, IN, LA, MS, there are ongoing cases in CA and DC. In AL Mr. Hendershott asked me to represent him. I submitted pro hac vice (request to the judge to allow an out of state attorney to represent in state client). The judge dismissed his case before ruling on my request, so I did not have an opportunity to represent him in AL.
Other individuals filed challenges in IL, PA, CA, FL, MA, TN, AZ, TX, DC. Similar challenges are expected all over the country.
My main concern and advice to voters: don’t limit your challenges to Article2 and Minor v Happersett, bring forward all the evidence of the Social Security fraud, forgery and elections fraud. I believe, that no judge will remove Obama from the ballot based on Minor v Hapersett only. I believe, that filing very limited cases based only on Minor, is a waste of time and money. It will take more, than that. It will take a combination of showing malfeasance, criminal behavior by Obama in conjunction with bringing forward the issue of eligibility based on his father’s foreign citizenship. The judges understand, that the citizens will not accept removal of a siting President from the ballot based on the interpretation of the Constitution only, as the reasonable question will be: why was he allowed in the WH in the first place? It will make the whole Congress culpable. Judges have hard time acknowledging culpability of one person, Obama, even when all the evidence points to it, I do not believe, they will hold the whole Congress culpable. Just as it happened in Watergate, evidence of flagrant criminality on part of the sitting President will do him in at the end. However, it is a free country and every attorney and every voter is free to do whatever he wants to do and file whatever he wants to file and has courage to tackle.
Comments
22 Responses to “Update on challenges around the country”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
February 11th, 2012 @ 3:46 am
works fine
February 11th, 2012 @ 5:59 am
Orly is right. Don’t just use Minor v Happersett to win the eligibility argument. Claim facts and lack of virtue as reasons not to vote for Obama.
1. He lied to the American people about where he was born.
A. His own wife, on Aug. 28, 2008, in her speech before LGBT delegates at the Democratic
Convention in Denver, said that Kenya is his “home country.” In a 2007 Tampa fundraiser, she said that he is “Kenyan.”
B. During the Nov. 5, 2009 session of the Kenyan Parliament, several members rose to
congratulate Obama’s victory, stating that he is, “born in Kenya, son of the soil, Kenya the
country he originates from, our brother Obama from Kogelo, Kenyan.”
C. His Kenyan step-grandmother said that she was in the Mombasa hospital delivery room
when he was born.
D. A 6-27-04 article in the Kenyan Standard Times begins with, “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama…”
2. Since 1977, he has been using a stolen SSN. This has been proven through the Government E-Verify System.
3. He has uttered forgery by allowing two falsified birth certificates on his website. Several imaging and scanning experts have been able to examine them and conclude they are forgeries. Obama has not challenged these experts.
4. His 2008 Certification of Nomination did not include the customary verbiage, “qualified according to the provisions of the constitution.”
5. He lied about how long he attended Columbia University.
6. He is not a natural born citizen because his father was never a U.S. citizen.
7. The American people don’t know who Obama is since he has sealed all his personal records.
Is this someone you want as your President?
February 11th, 2012 @ 6:18 am
You can go around and around the NBC all you want. No matter how you spin it… you can spell it Citizen or citizen… It’ always a matter of opinion: one judge will say two parents, another will say born on US soil… and on, and on, and on.
Opinions, opinion, opinions.
There is only one indisputable fact: The birth certificate is a FORGERY!!!
February 11th, 2012 @ 7:08 am
A DUAL citizen CANNOT be a Natural Born Citizen.
This statement drives the distinction of the Minor “doubts” on 14th Ammendment citizens and NBCs. Dual citizens are subject to the jurisdiction of foreign powers. If there is no distinction then they’d have the same name.
Emphasize this single statement of fact in your future arguments.
February 11th, 2012 @ 8:28 am
If another case comes up and Obama’s Lawyers don’t show up and you get a default judgement would you take that ruling or continue with a hearing?
February 11th, 2012 @ 8:37 am
I will decided on a case by case basis, whether to take default or not. Keep in mind, I am in a different situation now, I have everything on the record
February 11th, 2012 @ 9:05 am
Guam? Puerto Rico? American Samoa?
February 11th, 2012 @ 9:34 am
What does that mean, “on the record”? Is that important?
February 11th, 2012 @ 10:13 am
You do have everything on the record, Lady Liberty. And Administrative Law Judge Malihi has written what he thinks about that. Are you going to send his decision to the Secretaries of State, too?
February 11th, 2012 @ 10:16 am
Orly, I included the DNC in my complaint to the Secretary of State and the State Board of Elections… Is that OK?
I included the SSN fraud and the Fake Birth Certificate.
February 11th, 2012 @ 10:35 am
Ms Taitz.I donot know where you or any of your readers ever visit infowars site or not.There is an interresting article ther about Obama signing an executive order declaring war against Iran.If that is true martial law is just around the corner.Then there will be gun collection and fema camps.It appears at first sight Obama is getting desparate.
February 11th, 2012 @ 11:36 am
TO: 1 More1 recipientCC: recipientsYou More
BCC: recipientsYou Show Details FROM:ARTHUR OLSZEWSKI TO:Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ Message flagged Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:20 PM
Orly, I’m still having trouble posting on your site. So, I’m asking you to pass this info on to your PA. supporters, especially George W Ellis. They report they’re having trouble getting in touch with our SOS–Carol Aichele– about their petition to remove Obama from the ballot for 2012. I also have working on my petition and found that Aichele is out of loop at this stage of the game and that the Elections Bureau Head– Jessica Mathas- is taking all calls about this issue. Her number is 717 787 5280 Arto
February 11th, 2012 @ 12:05 pm
If you had to do it all over again in ga you would still stand by your choice and not take that default ruling. What was it like in the judges chambers that day. We you all in agreement. Did you have any idea in advance that was why he called you in. Did he give you time to talk alone about your decisions. Could one of you taken his decision and walk away or was it intake it or leave it. We you still go with the three of you or gone separately or you had no choice.
Good luck with the next case. Do you see any hearing before sheriff joe announces whatever he has on march 1st. Not counting on any smoking gun from him. Just the same old thing and little press coverage of it too.
February 11th, 2012 @ 3:57 pm
Try New Jersey.Last year,Sec.OF STATE,Kim Guadagno kept former Olympian,Carl Lewis,off of our ballot due to residency requirements.Because she would ascend to the Governor’s chair if Christie went to Washington,she may play ball.
February 11th, 2012 @ 6:59 pm
Orly…My brother is working on filing a challenge in North Carolina…I think the primary is in May…What better surprise for him than the state where the Democratic Convention is being held. We live about 20 minutes from Charlotte….how appropriate.
February 11th, 2012 @ 9:10 pm
testing mozilla again.
hasn’t been working at all
February 12th, 2012 @ 12:10 am
Please, to Everyone including Orly. Stop refereeing Minor v Happersett,!!! It does not say what you think it says.
Minor v Happersett DID NOT define a NBC as a child born to parents who are citizens. The judge’s opinion in that case simply said that a child born to parent citizens is enough to make the child a NBC. He merely said that it was sufficient. His opinion DID NOT limit the definition of a NBC to a child born to parent citizens.
Here is another example to clarify. Being given a million dollars is enough for someone to be considered wealthy.. but there are other ways to become wealthy. The definition of wealth is not limited to being given a million dollars even though being given a million dollars is sufficient to be considered wealthy.
Having said that, I believe a NBC is a child born to a father(not mother)who is a Untied States citizen. This conclusion is based on research going back to the revolutionary war.
Under this definition Obama is not eligible but it does not matter what little ole me says.. even if I’m repeating what our forefathers said. What matters is what the supreme court has to say and I’m certian they will re define the term to suit whatever agenda they are working towards.
February 12th, 2012 @ 4:40 am
> It will take a combination of showing malfeasance, criminal behavior by Obama in conjunction with bringing forward the issue of eligibility based on his father’s foreign citizenship.
But since “malfeasance [and] criminal behaviour” don’t make a candidate ineligible, this won’t win you any eligibility case.
When will you realize that these are two different things?
The criminal parts belong before a Grand Jury and the public; they have no place in an eligibility challenge.
Even if you could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt Obama murdered someone, no judge could remove him from any ballot because of that, simply because there’s no conjunction.
February 12th, 2012 @ 5:58 am
Denny,
You seem to be the only person so far that understands the actual meaning of Minor vs. Happersett.
Another example would be to say: “There is no doubt that those with a PHD are College graduates”. That does not change the fact that you can be a College graduate without having a PHD.
All the NBC talk and arguments is not different than the old argument of “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin”.
February 12th, 2012 @ 9:19 am
My take on Minor v. Happersett is that:
1) The Court acknowledged the Constitution did not define ‘who shall be a natural born citizen’.
2) The Court did say that to ascertain such resort must be had elsewhere. (I take it that the Court acknowledged such could be ascertained elsewhere).
3) The Court acknowledged that the framers of the Constitution having knowledge of common law never doubted that all children born in a country of parentS who were citizenS became citizens.
4)These were natives or ‘natural born citizens’ as distinguished from others.
I believe the court established with certainty that ‘natural born citizen’ is uniquely a person born of citizen parentS on the soil of the parentS citizenship.
February 12th, 2012 @ 11:40 am
Denny is right. What matters is how corrupt men define what THEY think a natural born citizen is, or should be. They can find all kinds of ways through grammatical ellipsis to to fool people, such as Jack Maskell (Congressional Research Services) did in his Memos to Congress explaining what a natural born citizen is.
When victory and power are at stake, as they are now and have never been before, men will do whatever it takes to gain them.
February 13th, 2012 @ 9:17 am
Gotta say Max’s comment #6 is CORRECT.
Obama’s hand (he signed off on it) provided and
produced a FRAUDULENT birth certificate with
criminal intent!!!!!
I’d focus on that long form Birth certificate
like a laser beam.
Dissect every stinking letter on that form,
Hire the top guns of scanning pros to compliment your witnesses,
I’m sending $$ soon- sorry I promised before
but soon big check coming.
People, send Orly $$$, we need to help her with cash!