OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Update in MS. Judge Coleman provided new suggested dates.Plaintiffs are requesting a clarification on the status of the case

Posted on | April 17, 2012 | 11 Comments

Taitz v. Democratic Party of Mississipp​i, et al, 1 JD Hinds County Circuit Court, # 251-12-107 CIV
Robert Kenneth Coleman
9:53 AM (36 minutes ago)
to me, Harold, Justin, Scott, Samuel, Francis, Barbara
Please be advised that the court has the following dates available for above referenced cause: April 30, week of May 7th, 22-25 of May, 2012. These dates are subject to the availability of a courtroom and court reporter. The court is asking the court administrator to please advise as to the availability as soon as feasible.  Counsel will confer as soon as possible and advise the court of dates agreeable.

(s) R. Kenneth Coleman
Phone:redacted
Reply

Reply to all

Orly Taitz
10:30 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Brian, Fran, gilbert, nagamine, Laurie, leahlax1234, Samuel, Tom, Robert, Harold, Justin, Scott
Request for clarification
Dear Judge Coleman,

1. Plaintiffs received this e-mail below from Your Honor with suggested alternative hearing dates and they are requesting a clarification. April 16 motion hearing was scheduled due to the motions to dismiss by the defendants. Those motions became moot, as the defendants filed answers to the complaint and we are now in the discovery phase and the subject matter of the April 16th motions to dismiss became moot.

2. Plaintiffs filed by first class mail  and e-mailed Your Honor their first Amended Complaint the same day as the defendants filed their answer to the original complaint. The right to amend is usually given freely particularly as it applies to the Pro Se Plaintiffs and to the first amended complaint and not the second or third or tenths amended complaint.  Plaintiffs are requesting clarification from Your Honor, whether Your Honor considers the first Amended complaint to be a complaint as of right, as it crossed in the mail with the answer or whether Your Honor gives the Plaintiffs leave for the First Amended Complaint.

3. As we are in discovery phase, Plaintiffs need to serve defendants and witnesses with subpoenas for production of records and depositions. Plaintiff Taitz is an attorney in good standing in the state of CA, just as the Defendant’s co-counsel attorney Tepper. The court waived technical requirements for Tepper and allowed him pro hac vice without Tepper’s full compliance with the rules and after the clerk denied Tepper’s pro hac vice for not complying with the rules and not providing his address.

Attorney and Plaintiff Taitz is requesting impartiality and the same consideration to her as was given to Tepper. She is willing to provide all her information. Her only problem, is lack of signature of local counsel to co-sign pro hac vice and to be a local contact, simply because this is a pro bono civil rights case and the subject matter is explosive, showing the sitting US President and Presidential candidate Barack Obama using forged identification papers. Most attorneys around the country and in MS are scared to touch this issue and particularly do it pro bono.

Taitz was granted hac vice in several states: TX, GA, PA without a signature of a local attorney contact. Taitz is requesting Your Honor the same consideration, to grant her pro hac vice without the local contact, so that she can issue MS subpoenas and have them simply co-signed by the clerk of the court instead of having to bother Your Honor with request to issue each and every MS subpoena for production of records and deposition.

4. Taitz is requesting a ruling on prior requests for subpoenas that were submitted to Your Honor.

5. It appears that until all of the above issues are clarified by Your Honor, it is pointless to even schedule a hearing as the parties do not know, what is the status of the case and what motions are moot, what motions or pleadings are ripe for a hearing, what witnesses can be subpoenaed.

Respectfully

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

cc all parties and counsel of record

Comments

11 Responses to “Update in MS. Judge Coleman provided new suggested dates.Plaintiffs are requesting a clarification on the status of the case”

  1. Bruriah Sarah
    April 17th, 2012 @ 1:34 pm

    What are the rules of discovery? Does Tepper have the right to see the names of the witnesses even while you are still in the process of discovery? If not, is it possible that the Judge would rule in the defendent’s favor?

  2. orly taitz
    April 17th, 2012 @ 1:40 pm

    I do not understand your question? What names of witnesses?

  3. Paul Jackson
    April 17th, 2012 @ 2:37 pm

    In any case counsel for both sides have a right to know any witnesses their opponent plans to call and what their testimony will entail, any witnesses they plan to depose and any exhibits planned to be used in deposition and/or court, in advance (and with proper notice) of counsel doing so.

  4. orly taitz
    April 17th, 2012 @ 2:43 pm

    right now we are waiting for judge Coleman to either grant me pro hac vice to issue subpoenas in MS or he needs to sign the subpoenas himself. The fact that this judge sat on the case for over a month and did not even contact the parties until after the primary and now is not granting pro hac or does not sign MS subpoenas, leads me to believe that there is some pressure on him to kill this case, and I am just about ready to go to the Supreme court of MS with a formal complaint

  5. Kurt Knabke
    April 17th, 2012 @ 2:52 pm

    Bruriah Sarah

    Tepper will receive a witness list from Orly prior to the trial. The judge will decide on the motions by both parties prior and during the trial. The decision on the merits of the case will come at the end of the trial. Check with Orly for she is the lawyer.

    Kurt

  6. orly taitz
    April 17th, 2012 @ 3:06 pm

    Mr. Knabke is correct

  7. Where
    April 17th, 2012 @ 3:07 pm

    A formal complaint to the MS Supreme court will get the notice it deserves. More than likely, the circular file.

    Why should you be granted pro hac vice when you can not get an attorney to sponsor you? Why should you always get by without following the court rules?

  8. orly taitz
    April 17th, 2012 @ 3:56 pm

    Coleman granted Tepper pro hac without following the rules

  9. Kurt Knabke
    April 18th, 2012 @ 8:56 am

    Where,

    Were you not informed that this case was all about not following the rules? That is just what the defendents did not do, was follow the rules. Next time try reading the case before commenting on it.

    Kurt

  10. orly taitz
    April 18th, 2012 @ 8:30 pm

    Tepper is not important. Obama is important, finding 1 honest judge is important. FOX is part of the establishment, thay are controlled opposition

  11. orly taitz
    April 19th, 2012 @ 6:07 am

    there will be no hearing on the 7th. It was cancelled until the Suprem Court rules on my petition to appoint another special judge

Leave a Reply