OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

This statistics will surprise you

Posted on | August 3, 2012 | 8 Comments

This statistics will surprise you

by Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

A lot is said about Chinese accomplishments during Olympics, but the results need to be put in perspective, mainly one has to look at the per capita numbers, per capita accomplishments. China has population of 1.3 billion. 34 medals received by Chinese athletes mean that if you are Chinese, you have a 1 in 39 million chance to receive  a medal. after 6 days of copetition U.S. received 37 medals, slightly more than China, but per capita results are much more significant: if you are an American, you have a 5 times higher chance or 1 in 8.2 million to get a medal. If you are from New Zealand, your chance to get a medal is 50 times higher than a chance of someone from China. New Zealand got 5 medals for 4 million people or 1 medal for 0.8 million. Of course the results after 6 days of competition are not the same as the final results. We expect more medal for the US in track and field, boxing, rowing, cycling. There will be more medals for Russians and Chinese as well.

Some results reflect the allocation of funds for sports, as was seen in the countries coming from the Eastern bloc. That probably explains high per capita numbers in Slovenia, Mongolia, Slovakia, Hungary and Cuba.

For some tiny countries statistics is not reliable. For example a tiny country of Qatar got just 1 medal but it bumped it’s standing towards the top of the list, the third place. With more medals per country  results are more reliable. Taking everything into consideration it is important to look at the trend: you see better results in smaller countries, typicallysmaller countries with developed economies.

See all per capita statistics below. They reflect results after 6 days. Each line shows a total population in millions. The population is rounded to the nearest million. Next I calculated the number of millions of population per 1 Olympic medal.  If you are a statistics junkie or sports junkie or political science junkie, you might be interested to see the results.

1. Slovenia 2 million/3 medals.  1medal for 0.7 million

2. New Zealand 4 million/5medals.  1medal for 0.8 million

3. Qatar 0.9 million 1medal.  1medal for 0.9million

4.Australia 21 million 13 medals 1medal for 1.6 million

5. Mongolia 3million  3medals. 1medal for 1.5million

6. Denmark 3 million 5 medals 1medal for 1.7 million

7. Slovakia 5m 1medal for 1.7million

8. Hungary  10 million 5 medals 1medal for 2million

9. Norway .7 million 2medals. 1medal for 2.4million

10. Netherlands 17million 6medals. 1medal for  2.8 million

11. Cuba 11million 4 medals . 1medal for 2.8million

12. Belarus 10million3medals. 1medal for 3.3million

13.Great Britain 61million 18 medals. 1medal for 3.4million

14. South Korea 49million 14 medals 1medal for 3.5 million

15 Lithuania 3.6million 1medal. 1medal for 3.6million

16. Romania 22million 6medals. 1medal for 3.7milion

17. France 64million 17medals 1medal for 3.8million

18. Moldova 4million 1medal. 1medal for 4million

19. Croatia 4million 1medal. 1medal for 4million

20 Sweden 9 million 2medals. 1medal for 4.5 million

21. Georgia 4.6 million 1 medal 1medal for 4.6million

22. Singapore 4.6 million 1medal. 1medal for 4.6million

23.  Germany 61 million. 1medal for 4.6 million

24. Canada 33 million 7 medals. 1medal for 3.7 million

25. North Korea 23million 5 medals. 1 medal for 4.7 million

26. Belgium 10 million 2 medals. 1medal for 5 million

27.Szeck Republic 10 million 2 medals. 1medal for 5 million

28. Kazakhstan 15 million 3 medals. 1 medal for 5 million

29. Italy 33million 7 medals. 1medalfor 5.3 million

30 Japan 127 million 19 medals. 1medal for 6.7 million

31 Ukraine 46 million 6medals. 1medal for 7.7 million

32. Azerbajan   8 million 1medal. 1 medal for 8 million

33. U.S. 304 million 37 medals. 1 medal for 8.2 million

33. Russia 140 million 17 medals. 1 medal for 8.3 million

34. Greece 11 million 1 medal. 1 medal for 11 million

35. South Africa 44 million 3 medals. 1 medal for 15 million

36. Colombia 45 million 3 medals 1medal for 15 million

37. Poland 39 million 2 medals. 1 medal for 19.5 million

38. Spain 40 million 2 medals. 1 medal for 20 million

39. Taiwan 23 million 1 medal. 1 medal for 23 million

40. Venezuela 26 million 1 medal. 1medal for 26 million

41 Uzbekistan 28 million 1 medal for 28 million

42 China 1,330 million 34 medals. 1 medal for 39 million

43.Brazil 192 million 4 medals. 1 medal for 48 million

44. Thailand 65 million 1 medal. 1 medal for 65 million

45. Egypt 82 million 1 medal. 1medal for 82 million

46. Indonesia 119 million 1 medal. 1 medal for 119 million

47. India 1,148 million 1 medal. 1medal for 1,148 million

Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, orly taitz attorney, Orly Taitz doctor and attorney

Comments

8 Responses to “This statistics will surprise you”

  1. Alec
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 12:10 pm

    This is a very interesting observation! So, does this mean that if “they” get their way, and the entire world is merged into a one world government, nobody will get any medals?

  2. ch
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

    After seeing the children’s camps in China, where children are taken away from families for training, with endless hours swimming, I do not think I can stomach the Olympics anymore. I used to think that professionals were not allowed and it was an amateur competition. But if state-funded programs take children away for a life of training, then this hardly seems a sport among amateurs, but even more professional than professional sports. It is sickening and I no longer support the Olympics, unless ground rules are laid for training, etc. Sounds live holocaust slave labor camps for children, and it should be stopped by the world community. That is just in my opinion.

  3. Leslie Johnson
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 5:20 pm

    I’ve always thought the Olympic Games should be open for all athletes to participate in, whether they are amateurs or professionals.

    By opening the Olympic Games to all, it eliminates any chance of a professional sneaking in where they are not allowed.

    The less rules the better.

    The Olympic Games should be a showcase of the worlds bests athletes, no more, no less.

    Eliminate all the testing and just let the athletes do their thing.

  4. The Phoenix
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 7:13 pm

    I’m wondering if this type of “training” is done in Russia, as well? Or in any of the other commie nations?

    This was really disgusting to view the photo! I’m also wondering if all the liberals think that it’s still great to want this kind of “way of life” here? They just aren’t understanding what this really means!

  5. Sven Teigen
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 7:53 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

    Your tireless work for America — and now for China as well! — can only enhance your already august reputation with the Nobel Nomination Committee.

    But I write this evening to inform you that it appears your email is being interfered with in some way. I have sent you three (3) copies of a set of informational documents needed to further process your nomination, and all three (3) have bounced back as “undeliverable”.

    Not to worry! We have your physical address and can send the documents by what you Americans call “snail mail”. But if you will, please respond to my message by sending me an email at:

    nominationcommittee@nobelprize.org.se

    Then post here that you have sent an email and I will confirm whether or not it was received.

    It’s an abomination that we should have to endure this atrocity simply to communicate one with another. But then, if governments were not of a totalitarian bent — AS THEY ARE — we would have no need for such prizes as the Nobel Peace Prize! No?

    Be strong!

    Sven Teigen
    Nobel Nomination Committee

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 4th, 2012 @ 3:51 am

    are you kidding me? what do you mean eliminate all the testing? you have to test to disqualify everyone, who is using preformance enhancing drugs

  7. Leslie Johnson
    August 4th, 2012 @ 7:29 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    Why I’m against testing, the real good cheaters know ways to fool the tests.

    So the tests are actually helping those athletes who are good cheaters, because the tests are just eliminating the athletes using drug and don’t know how to cheat very good.

    If I remember right, when the Olympic Games were held in South Korea, it was later discovered that some of the top athletes had used drugs but somehow fooled the tests.

    I’m against using anykind of illegal drugs myself.

    Do preformance enhancing drugs really give an unfair edge to the users, over a good well cinditioned athlete, I just don’t know.

    Aren’t some preformance drugs that legal and some that aren’t.

    Even Coffee, cokes, and teas can perk a person up so they can do better. Should they be banned too?

    Where do we draw the line to ban or not to ban?

    For myself I don’t even like to take anykind of painkillers.

    The more rules there are the more it gives the dishonest person the edge over the honest person.

  8. Leslie Johnson
    August 4th, 2012 @ 7:44 pm

    Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    Why I’m against testing, the real good cheaters know ways to fool the tests.

    So the tests are actually helping those athletes who are good cheaters, because the tests are just eliminating the athletes using drug and don’t know how to cheat very good.

    If I remember right, when the Olympic Games were held in South Korea, it was later discovered that some of the top athletes had used drugs but somehow fooled the tests.

    I’m against using anykind of illegal drugs myself.

    Do preformance enhancing drugs really give an unfair edge to the users, over a good well conditioned athlete, I just don’t know.

    Aren’t some preformance enhancing drugs legal?

    Even Coffee, cokes, and teas can perk a person up so they can do better. Should they be banned too?

    Where do we draw the line, to ban or not to ban?

    For myself I don’t even like to take anykind of painkillers.

    The more rules there are, the more it gives the dishonest person the edge over the honest person.

Leave a Reply