This looks like a RICO, a racketeering organization to deprive US citizens of their 2nd amendment rights, this also looks like 12 USC 1983-1985 violation of civil rights under the color of authority. Typically there is a criminal liability and prison term, if convicted. Write to me to orly.taitz@hushmail.com, if you were
Posted on | February 10, 2014 | 7 Comments
Press rlease
Law Offices of Orly Taitz
This Bloomberg Mayors’ club to confiscate guns looks like a RICO, a racketeering organization to deprive US citizens of their 2nd amendment rights, this also looks like 42 USC 1983-1985 violation of civil rights under the color of authority. Typically there is a criminal liability and prison term, if convicted. Write to orly.taitz@hushmail.com, if you were affected. Remember Hitler started with gun registry, which was followed by gun confiscation, which was followed by exterminations in concentration camps. An agreement to deprive citizens of their constitutional Second Amendment rights is a criminal racketeering agreement and a violation of civil rights under the color of authority as well as a criminal conspiracy to violate civil rights under the color of authority. If you were affected by this criminal agreement, write to Attorney Orly Taitz at orly.taitz@hushmail.com. More on cases by Orly Taitz on TaitzReport.com. Taitz is working pro bono. Any donations to this cause are appreciated and can be given via pay-pal on Orltaitzesq.com or by mail at 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100, Rancho santa Margarita, CA 92688
50 of Bloomberg’s Mayors Quit After Gun Confiscation Plan Leaked
(by Adan Salazar) — Nearly 50 mayors have jumped ship on former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” campaign over allegations that the group’s ultimate goal is outright gun confiscation, according to one former member.
As reported, Poughkeepsie Mayor John Tkazyik published a statement in last week’s Poughkeepsie Journal coming clean about the group’s true intentions, total disarmament of law-abiding gun owners.
“Under the guise of helping mayors facing a crime and drug epidemic, MAIG intended to promote confiscation of guns from law-abiding citizens,” Tkazyik said, confirming what many already suspected about the group.
“Nearly 50 pro-Second Amendment mayors have left the organization. They left for the same reason I did,” he also added.
The fact that 50 mayors bailed in response to a concerted effort to undermine the Bill of Rights is certainly headline-worthy, but so far, unsurprisingly, few other media outlets have picked the story up.
And Tkazyik isn’t the first to cast these allegations. In 2007, the mayor of Williamsport, Pa., also said she left after witnessing “dubious” attempts to subvert the Second Amendment. “I have learned that the coalition may be working on issues which conflict with legal gun ownership, and that some actions on your behalf are dubious,” then-Williamsport Mayor Mary Wolf wrote in a letter to Bloomberg himself.
And just last year, during a Mothers Demand Action rally (a gun control coalition which merged with MAIGin December 2013), Austin, Texas City Councilman Mike Martinez singled out a protestor carrying a “Stop the Gun Ban” sign and told him, “…there is no gun ban currently, but because of the work we’re doing here today, we will make your sign legitimate shortly, so you hang on to that.”
News of the group’s traitorous crusade comes at a time when American gun owners are already wary of continual attempts to curtail firearm ownership. Since the Sandy Hook school shooting, the Obama administration has proposed legislation aimed at combating “gun violence,” including proposals that would require background checks for all gun sales; in effect, registration.
American gun owners who know the history behind gun control are fearful that a federal gun registry will eventually lead to confiscation. Indeed, numerous articles have been published showing how, since 2007, roving law enforcement teams have been disarming Californians deemed “illegal” using a list of owners.
However, in the face of blatant evidence, the director of MAIG, Mark Glaze, has boldly gone on to publicly deny that “nobody in California has come to take anyone’s guns.”
The fact that groups like MAIG are to the point of openly bragging about their intentions doesn’t bode well for gun owners. It signifies the establishment is preparing to take grand strides to convince the American public of the “dangers” posed by guns. That means more contrived scenes of violence with guns at their center.
The fact that Obama has repeatedly asserted his willingness to work around Congress to make things happen is also worrying. In his 2014 State of the Union speech he also mentioned that his administration would continue to address “gun violence,” and that he intends to “keep trying, with or without Congress, to help stop more tragedies from visiting innocent Americans in our movie theaters and our shopping malls, or schools like Sandy Hook.”
It should now be abundantly clear that any reassurances, given by known liars such as Obama or any of his anti-Second Amendment teams, are merely to placate gun owners into a state of pacification and complacency. However, the jig is now up and the curtain has been lifted.
Overall, 50 mayors bailing on the group over its future plans shows a definite sea change in the way public servants are regarding citizens’ rights and the Second Amendment. However, it is simply incredible that more mayors, knowing the treasonous goals of the organization, have not abandoned ship.
Here’s a list of mayors that are members of Bloomberg’s initiative.
Comments
7 Responses to “This looks like a RICO, a racketeering organization to deprive US citizens of their 2nd amendment rights, this also looks like 12 USC 1983-1985 violation of civil rights under the color of authority. Typically there is a criminal liability and prison term, if convicted. Write to me to orly.taitz@hushmail.com, if you were”
Leave a Reply
February 10th, 2014 @ 4:09 pm
While “progressive elites” try to nanny us into submission, more and more Western Countries are embracing “the Swiss Model” for immigration affairs:
———-
(Drudge)
Australian PM draws hard line on asylum-seekers…
UK PM faces domestic pressure to curb immigration…
February 10th, 2014 @ 4:23 pm
WOW!!! I just read the list!!! that’s alot of payoff’s.. I mean names!
February 10th, 2014 @ 4:27 pm
To me, fond of the Jewish people, it is ironic that the elimination of people’s ability to defend themselves, as brought to us now by an American Jew, parallels the elimination of ‘undesirables’ inside Hitler’s Germany, as initially brought to that nation by Jewish doctors.
February 10th, 2014 @ 5:53 pm
How is this traitor not in prison? This just proves how stupid American’s are.
February 11th, 2014 @ 6:35 am
The second amendment unambiguously prohibits government from restricting the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It also assures, through the “no Bill of Attainder” clause that the people shall not be deprived of any civil right as a punishment for any crime. Therefore only upon sentence of death or life in prison is one hindered from exercising their rights; otherwise all rights are retained by the people.
Judges, lawyers, and our legislators, are all too fond of claiming “no right is absolute” but in truth, it is the authority of government that is not absolute.
February 11th, 2014 @ 3:58 pm
Think about it:
Empty our homes of Guns; Fill our skies with Drones.
Isn’t it almost a perfect storm?
What about when legislators can’t do anything to stop it even if they would want to?
Then what?
February 11th, 2014 @ 4:00 pm
Then what?
Road Warriors? Water World?