This is the correspondence that I received. I am asking for comments on the matter. I am not an expert. An expert is stating that Mr. Davidson used this Alan BC as a “reconstructed” Obama LFCOLB and that he did it some 18 months prior to release.
Posted on | May 13, 2014 | 15 Comments
Dear Dr. Taitz
I traced the Alan BC back to June 18, 2008 when Alan himself released it on his blog.
See: https://snarkybytes.com/2008/06/18/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963/
“Hawaii Birth Certificate – 1963”
“There’s been some questions raised about what a birth certificate from Hawaii might look like.
Here’s mine from 1963, with some of the details redacted.”
The JPEG of the BC is here:
https://snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg
Click once on the certificate image to get the Hi Res image. I have attached this one.
This is the one Davidson altered to create Obama’s “RECONSTRUCTED” LFCOLB.
Sincerely,
Henry
From: Henry Wayland Blake [mailto:hwblake@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 3:00 PM
To: ‘Orly Taitz’
Subject: RE: Kevin Davidson’s Comment about you…
Dear Dr. Taitz
I already posted a question on Obamaconspiracy.org in which I asked Dr. C. who he got his JPEG from.
He blocked the comment.
Dr. C. is lately blocking all my comments on his blog because he knows that I know that he created his Obama LFCOLB “RECONSTRUCTION” by altering the “Alan” BC. Dr. C. erased and replaced only the minimum text to convert the Alan certificate to his “RECONSTRUCTED” Obama LFCOLB. Much of the Obama certificate is actually the Alan certificate. There are many words and characters that are identical down to the individual pixel.
I always thought that alteration of an identity document is a crime. He seems to think his “forgery” is OK because he added “RECONSTRUCTION” in red. I’ve asked him several times how his forgery can be a “RECONSTRUCTION” when the “original Obama LFCOLB” didn’t exist in 2009. He always answers that the “original Obama LFCOLB” existed at the HDOH. Of course, the WH didn’t release the Obama LFCOLB PDF image until Apr 27, 2011. So Mr. C. created his masterpiece 18 months before Obama released his LFCOLB PDF image.
I’ll wait a few days to let the dust settle and then I’ll try to sneak a comment onto Davidson’s blog.
Sincerely,
Henry
From: Orly Taitz [mailto:orly.taitz@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 1:46 PM
To: Henry Wayland Blake; Chito Papa Gen Rajska
Subject: Re: Kevin Davidson’s Comment about you…
I do not remember posting an unredacted BC. It is possible that I made a mistake at some point, but I do not remember doing this. Can you ask him for a specific link to my site?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Henry Wayland Blake <hwblake@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Dear Dr. Taitz
Just a heads up…
Kevin Davidson posted the following line on his blog in reaction to his name being published on the Vogt list.
“First, here is the Johanna Ah’Nee birth certificate for those who haven’t seen it. This came through Orly Taitz.”
See: https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2014/05/as-the-birther-turns/#comment-330142
He’s implying that he got his JPEG copy the AhNee BC from you.
If so, then you would have had to have posted a totally unredacted JPEG copy or your blog sometime in the past and then Davidson downloaded that JPEG copy off your site.
I recall that the documents that Johanna AhNee Emailed to you were in PDF format. Someone would have had to extract the JPEG from your PDF.
Chito Papa could probably figure out if Davidson could have possibly obtained his copy off your web site.
Sincerely,
Henry
Comments
15 Responses to “This is the correspondence that I received. I am asking for comments on the matter. I am not an expert. An expert is stating that Mr. Davidson used this Alan BC as a “reconstructed” Obama LFCOLB and that he did it some 18 months prior to release.”
Leave a Reply
May 13th, 2014 @ 1:52 pm
Orly, is this information correct?
Judge Orders Investigation Into Obama’s Fake Social Security Number
https://americanoverlook.com/judge-orders-investigation-into-obamas-fake-social-security-number-8/17048
May 13th, 2014 @ 2:22 pm
this was an intermediary order, I am waiting for a final order, it should come any day now
May 13th, 2014 @ 3:00 pm
Dr. Conspiracy’s reconstruction was based off of the “Alan BC.” This can be best seen by comparing the penciled notation marks.
And yes, it was created in August of 2009 which would be about 20 months prior to the release of the President’s long form.
https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/08/the-long-form-reconstructed/
And no, there is nothing criminal about altering an ID document if the alteration is not used to commit fraud.
May 13th, 2014 @ 3:51 pm
Statements are being made about unredacted reconstructed…basically changed or modified copies of Adobe PDF docs. PDF docs are not alone identification documents and can be changed like any digital file or picture. No forgery takes place unless one swears that they are presenting a copy of the original. No copy of an original BC has every been presented for Pres Obama. Never. None.
Changes were made to the PDF file that is stored on the 2008 blog so it is unlikely that the original with layers is presented.
It does look like if one had the original pdf with layers that a good base for building fake copies exists in that pdf. How Hawaii made their copy is almost certain but it is not an original. No original or nurse log exists at any hospital in Hawaii.
May 13th, 2014 @ 4:13 pm
Dr. Taitz
I have followed your valiant efforts to uncover the truth and support and defend the Constitution.
As a part or full time geographical resident of Hawaii who pays property tax I was considering the following, with minimal elaboration.
Certainly not on a par with the law student who appealed his speeding ticket all the way to the Supreme Court when 55 became un popularly mandated, here was something I considered.
Small claims action against the StTe of Hawaii and the U.d. Attorney, with Duces Tecumseh for President Obaba birth records. Rationale: Virtual Representation.
You will recall this legal precedent was the foundation of the Amrican Republic.
I do not think the courts would take it seriously or even have a sense of validity or humor.
Keep up the good work.
With aloha,
RJ Parsons
May 13th, 2014 @ 7:33 pm
My 2009 Obama long form reconstruction is documented in my 2009 article, which lists the Alan certificate as a primary source. I also got information from the Nordyke certificate and others.
https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/08/the-long-form-reconstructed/
Blake has “discovered” nothing, and nonsense like that is what got him banned.
May 14th, 2014 @ 6:03 am
Mr. Davidson,
I understand your point. My question is, why do you have a halo in your document? Did you use unsharp mask software?
May 14th, 2014 @ 1:44 pm
The Alan certificate I based my reconstruction on has some fuzzy areas around its text, for example around the word “Honolulu” which is unaltered from the Alan original. The text I changed, for example the word “BARACK,” doesn’t have a halo. So not having created the halos myself, as some call them, I can’t say for sure why they are there. My guess is that it has to with a low-quality JPG compression of the Alan original.
I don’t have a copy of Photoshop, and the photo software I use doesn’t have an “unsharp mask.”
May 14th, 2014 @ 6:24 pm
Mr. Conspiracy
Alan’s link to the Alan BC
https://snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg
W = 1292 px = 6.5 in. @ 200 PPI
H = 1050 px = 5.3 in. @ 200 PPI
MB = 1.07
Q = 100%
Davidson’s link to his copy of the Alan BC
https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sample-certificatelivebirth-hi-med2.jpg
W = 800 px = 8.0 in. @ 100 PPI
H = 650 px = 6.5 in. @ 100 PPI
KB = 158
Q = 85%
Davidson’s link to his oldest Obama “RECONSTRUCTION”
https://web.archive.org/web/20090906225456/https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/obama_long_form_reconstruction2.jpg
W = 771 px = 7.7 in. @ 100 PPI
H = 631 px = 6.3 in. @ 100 PPI
KB = 223.75
Q = 95%
Davidson’s link to his newest Obama “RECONSTRUCTION”
https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/obama_long_form_reconstruction.jpg
W = 771 px = 7.7 in. @ 100 PPI
H = 631 px = 6.3 in. @ 100 PPI
KB = 170.72
Q = 85%
Conclusions:
1.
The original Alan BC is (1292 px x 1020 px) and (200 PPI x 200 PPI) JPEG image with a file size of 1.07 MB and JPEG quality factor of 100%.
2.
Davidson’s copy of the Alan BC is (800 px x 650 px) and (100 PPI x 100 PPI) JPEG image with file size of 158 KB and a JPEG quality factor of 85%.
3.
Davidson’s oldest “RECONSTRUCTION” is (771 px x 631 px) and (100 PPI x 100 PPI) JPEG image with file size of 223.75 KB and a JPEG quality of 95%.
4.
Davidson’s newest “RECONSTRUCTION” is (771 px x 631 px) and (100 PPI x 100 PPI) JPEG image with file size of 170.72 KB and quality factor of 85%.
5.
All of Davidson’s images are lower pixel resolution and JPEG quality than the original Alan JPEG image.
6.
All of Davidson’s images were likely downsampled from the original Alan image.
7.
Davidson’s explanation that the white halos were caused by the low JPEG quality of the original Alan image is flat wrong !
8.
It is much more likely that any white halos would be related to Davidson’s downsampling of Alan’s original JPEG image.
You can’t trust an Obot to get it right !
What a mess !
May 14th, 2014 @ 7:20 pm
I am not an expert in this area. I am trying to understand, what is the purpose of the downsampling? How does one benefit from the downsampling?
May 15th, 2014 @ 5:33 am
Henry Blake writes:
“Davidson’s explanation that the white halos were caused by the low JPEG quality of the original Alan image is flat wrong !”
1) Davidson has no need to “explain” the objective fact that the “halos” were already present in the Alan original image, and that his own added text has none. This can be observed directly from the links that Blake himself provides.
2) Davidson’s comment was that “My guess is that it has to with a low-quality JPG compression of the Alan original.” This is a comment regarding the quality of the original JPEG compression and has nothing whatsoever to do with image size or subsequent downsampling. The same size image can be created with different compression algorithms of varying quality. Blake appears to be an amateur.
May 15th, 2014 @ 8:14 pm
if you compare the 2, the halo is definitely different
May 17th, 2014 @ 2:21 pm
I found the Alan certificate somewhere on the Internet and about the only thing I can be sure of is that I didn’t get it from Alan’s site because I didn’t know about that until now. So wherever I got it had a lower quality image than the original.
If someone wanted to do image searches, they could probably come up with the source image that I used, but I fail to see how any of Henry Blake’s questions have any relevance.
I got some images off the Internet and mocked up an Obama birth certificate. DUH.
If Blake doesn’t believe that, it’s his problem.
May 17th, 2014 @ 2:27 pm
Downsampling is just a way reducing resolution. It makes the file size smaller.
I didn’t downsample the image myself. It had already happened before I got it.
These annoying, time consuming, ill-informed and irrelevant objections are why I don’t let Blake post on my site. It just wastes everybody’s time and builds frustration when he won’t listen to reason.
May 17th, 2014 @ 2:36 pm
I am not an expert, but I am trying to understand why he halo on your version of Alan bc looks so different? How did it happen?