There is no value to allegations against Romney. Mitt Romney is a natural born citizen and eligible for the U.S. Presidency
Posted on | January 11, 2012 | 26 Comments
After wins in IA and NH it appears that Mitt Romney is heading towards the Republican nomination. Recently I was bombarded with e-mails and comments, claiming Romney to be ineligible and claiming that Romney’a father and Romney are Mexican citizens.
While Romney’s grandfather and father lived in Mexico for some time, there is no evidence of them ever losing the US citizenship and gaining Mexican citizenship. There isn’t a shred of evidence. I can’t tell for sure, but I would not be surprised, if this nonsense about Romney came from Obama’s campaign. As such, I will not be posting those comments, as this is unfounded slander.
On the other hand, we have ample evidence of Obama not being eligible:
1. Due to his use of of CT SSN 042-68-4425, which was not assigned to Barack Obama according to E-verify and SSNVS. Not only it is circumstantial evidence of lack of eligibility, it is also evidence, which would justify criminal charges of SSN fraud
2.Due to his use of alleged copy of a birth certificate, which was deemed to be a forgery by experts
3.Due to his citizenship designation as Indonesian in his school records in Indonesia
4. Due to his use of different last names according to his mother’s passport records, where he is listed as Barack Obama Soebarkah and in his school records he is listed under the last name Soetoro. There is no evidence of him ever legally changing his last name from Soebarkah or Soetoro to Obama
5.Due to his insonsistency of residency
6. According to the definition in Minor v Happersett natural born citizen means one born in the country to two citizen parents. Obama’s father was never a citizen , nor was he ever a permanent resident
7. Even if judge Malihi decides to go with a definition of natural born found in Wong Kim Ark, Obama will still be ineligible due to reasons 1-5. Incidentally, in this hypothetical potential Republican vice Presidential candidates Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindel will be deemed eligible, as according to the definition in Wong Kim Ark children of permanent residents qualify as natural born citizens as well. Rubio and Jindel were born to two permanent residents. Obama still does not qualify due to reasons 1-6.
Sincerely
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Comments
26 Responses to “There is no value to allegations against Romney. Mitt Romney is a natural born citizen and eligible for the U.S. Presidency”
Leave a Reply
January 11th, 2012 @ 4:16 pm
I may have missed it. Where in the constitution is the requirement that a candidate for President have a valid social security number, not used a different name (or had a step parent call him by a different name), not have a birth certificate? I’m missing something, please straighten me out.?
January 11th, 2012 @ 4:23 pm
It is absolutely clear that Mitt Romney is NOT a Natural Born Citizen unless he can prove that George Romney and his wife were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth in 1947.
If we are so demanding that Obama produce records to show that he is eligible, why not Romney?
January 11th, 2012 @ 4:33 pm
there is no evidence of them losing their US citizenship
January 11th, 2012 @ 4:44 pm
I would still like to see Mitt’s college grades, medical records, and all the other vital records, and the same requests of all the other candidates including Obama. Forget this privacy rule with folks that want to be President. As a voter I would like to know as much as I can about the person who might be running the country. We did not get that information the first time around with Obama let’s hope it does not happen again.
January 11th, 2012 @ 4:48 pm
No, they must be up to something. They got all of that money, easy enough to plant evidence, etc….
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:02 pm
Yes, Romney, Jindall and Rubio are eligible.
Of course, there’s no evidence of Obama losing his either.
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:12 pm
Wong Kim Ark did not spell out natural born citizen PLEASE see naturalborncitizen?wordpress.com
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:15 pm
it is true, Wong Kim Ark does not specifically state natural born and I will argue that. I do not know, what the judge will decide though
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:15 pm
there is no evidence of him gaining it either
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:35 pm
Very concise and informative!
many thanks…
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:47 pm
Since there is so much confusion on what the constitution says is the requirement for a Presidential candidate, even the courts don’t know how to handle this. Also the courts maybe confused if you can challenge a existing President. In Obama’s case don’t you think the answers to the questions about his background is in those vital records he has sealed. The SSN can be easily answered by looking up his tax returns over the last few years and see what SSN he used. The College grades would have the names he used while going to school. Not sure if the SSN is on them but if they have a Student ID it most likely would be his SSN. His medical records would show any medical condition he might have. It could answer why he has a possible scar from his ear to the top of his head, I think it’s on the right side. The camera normally does not show that side for whatever reason. Since his hair is short it has been very viable the last few weeks. There are other vital records I missed. It could paint a complete picture if we can get a hold of them. It seems the courts are using the Privacy act to protect him and we don’t have any standing in asking for them. OK as a voter it might be a stretch using what they told us having standing means, but any candidate that ran in 2008 or is running in 2012 is affected by having someone who is not eligible running against them. The only way to prove this is look at the vital records.
January 11th, 2012 @ 5:48 pm
There is STILL a difference in being a “citizen,” and being a “Natural Born Citizen.”
Mr Jackson, In Indonesia, dual citizenship wasn’t allowed when Barry Sotoero became a citizen there. Why would you need proof? There is also no proof that Barry applied for citizenship when he came back to the states, even when he attended college as a foreign student, like his father did. He is a “citizen,” though, since he married Michelle.
January 11th, 2012 @ 6:02 pm
Orly,
Orly,
Please don’t get upset for the following question? How in the world do you have time to work on all these cases, fly all over the place, post on this blog, still have your dental practice, run for senate, and what ever else you do during the day. At this point it’s almost impossible for one person to do all this? What is your secret? You know if the press was reporting on all these cases they would be asking you this question all the time. They even ask the candidates how they travel to all these rallies.
Please let us know how you do it!! Thanks.
January 11th, 2012 @ 9:59 pm
@Vandaryl, Vodka.
January 11th, 2012 @ 10:02 pm
Could you please include a supporting link to each statement refuting Obama’s eligibility? I haven’t heard most of what you are stating as fact before. Ever.
January 12th, 2012 @ 2:49 am
Wong Kim Ark did NOT decide that the individual in question was an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’, on the contrary, it concluded that HE was a ‘citizen’; nothing more
In fact, it COMPARED the two distinct classes; the decision did NOT equate them
January 12th, 2012 @ 3:00 am
Ask to see the birth record of Barry Soetoro in HI. According to the St. Francis Assisi school record, Barry Soetoro was born in Honolulu, HI. Certainly they have a birth record for him.
Instead of using Virginia Sunahou’s birth record number, Obama may be using Barry Soetoro’s birth record information.
January 12th, 2012 @ 7:17 am
Checkmate!
January 12th, 2012 @ 11:57 am
A “citizen” is such by native birth right.
A “natural born Citizen” is such, by both native birth right AND descent.
The descent principle is given weight by the fact that children born out of US limits, to US citizen parents, are US citizens by descent, in fact these children, born out of US limits, were deemed as “natural born citizens” in the first Naturalization Act of 1790, even though a later act called them citizens, the descent principle still exists to this day.
January 12th, 2012 @ 7:12 pm
what will you do if in fact, obama is an american citizen, that his ss# and selective service id have been replaced as if he was in a witness protection progam?
what if martha trowbridge is correct: his mother is a white jew; his dad Malcolm X and as a tot, he was scurried out of the country to live in indonesia?
that his folklore biography is just that?
that they are making you spin your wheels, taking the wrong fork in the road?
his legal debt is being paid with opm: maybe Solyndra, maybe a super-pac, etc.?
after all, Holder will not contest how he is spending contributions. no audit for him. no siree.
if you have a new id, very difficult to be traced except by a dna test.
why not get an order from the court for a dna test to ascertain his social security # actually matches a reincarnated dead man from connecticut?
one you get the dna test, the doors are wide open!
did you ever notice how his daughters resemble malcom x’s girls?
January 12th, 2012 @ 9:22 pm
NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO,NO!!!!!
Why defend ANYONE who hasn’t shown airtight proof of their eligibility!
Haven’t we learned a thing about all this? This is ridiculous! Are we going to get more questions about a new president’s records AFTER they get in office AGAIN?
Questions have to be asked, and eligibility has to be established when someone first signs up to run for office, NOT AFTER!
January 12th, 2012 @ 11:11 pm
to “MichaelN”
‘The descent principle is given weight’ lol by the VERY definition of the word “natural”
natural~marked by freedom from affectation
natural~ THE CLASSIFICATION OF ORGANISMS(eg U.S. citizens) ACCORDING TO RELATIONSHIPS BASED UPON DESCENT FROM A COMMON ANCESTOR
To wit:
1 NON-U.S. CITIZEN{Barack Obama Sr} + ONE U.S. CITIZEN {Stanley Ann Dunham} ≠ ONE ARTICLE II ‘natural born Citizen’
≠ ~ does not yield
natural~the REJECTION of ALL explanation that makes, allows, or calls for exceptions
January 13th, 2012 @ 12:57 am
you can’t, it’s invasion of privacy
March 23rd, 2012 @ 12:01 pm
my question is if obama is not eligible because of his parents then mitt and rick also need to prove they can hold the office and I like to see the proof mitt grand parents were citizens and don’t tell me they are because they where born in Utah. Utah was not a state until 1896. actual his grad parents were born in what was a territory of the united states that was wonce owned by Mexico. and just because you were born their it doesn’t make you a citizen because if it did then no one in the territory would of had to state in court saying they were pleading to become one. and until rick shows proof his dad became one prior to his birth he is not able to hold the office under the consitution like obama who knows under law he is not able to either
March 24th, 2012 @ 4:30 am
Romney’s parents are American citizens and he was born in this country
July 7th, 2012 @ 8:27 pm
[…] https://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30254 […]