OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Taitz will be on Peter Boyles show tomorrow 10 EST talking about her case to stop trafficking of illegal aliens by the government

Posted on | August 21, 2014 | 10 Comments

Taitz will be on Peter Boyles show tomorrow 10 EST talking about her case to stop trafficking of illegal aliens by the government

a number of media outlests are now reporting on her upcoming August 27th hearing

Federal judge orders hearing in illegal immigration case

Sonoran News  – ‎14 hours ago‎
orly taitz BROWNSVILLE, Texas – Last week, U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered a hearing at 1:30 p.m. on Aug. 27 to address all pending motions in a complaint brought by California Attorney Orly Taitz (r) against President Barack Obama, …

TX Federal judge issues Order To Show Cause; Response due in 10 days

Examiner.com  – ‎Aug 4, 2014‎
The plaintiff in the case is Dr. Orly Taitz, and defendants are Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services; US President, Barack Obama; U.S.

Lawsuit seeks to deport border crossers

Valley morning Star  – ‎Aug 8, 2014‎
BROWNSVILLE – California dentist and attorney Orly Taitz is challenging the transfer of undocumented immigrants from South Texas to other states, saying they would spread epidemics of scabies, tuberculosis, measles, whooping cough, swine flu, dengue …

Deportations sought: Lawsuit to remove or quarantine immigrants moves forward

Valley morning Star  – ‎Aug 14, 2014‎
In response, a Justice Department attorney said Taitz has no standing to bring the lawsuit, that she only seeks to entangle the judiciary in her political quarrels and is unhappy with policy decisions and the government’s lawful exercise of discretion 

Federal judge in Texas sets hearing on August 27, 2014, for immigration case

Examiner.com  – ‎Aug 15, 2014‎
Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney, is seeking, among other requests, a two-month quarantine for the treatment and prevention of disease and for the spreading of infectious diseases in the general population — particularly in public schools.

Comments

10 Responses to “Taitz will be on Peter Boyles show tomorrow 10 EST talking about her case to stop trafficking of illegal aliens by the government”

  1. Shelley Smith
    August 21st, 2014 @ 11:04 am

    What you should do is put the shoe on the other foot for once and just not show up at the hearing. See how “Obama” likes it when it’s done to him.

  2. Give 'em hell, Orly...
    August 21st, 2014 @ 2:00 pm

    I don’t think that O would be hurt if Orly didn’t show up. Just the opposite!

    So…Texas Patriots, as an Orly supporter, I’m asking you folks to contact various entities, such as Gov. Perry, etc., to see to it that there will be protection for Orly and all concerned.

    Like the National Guard? Texas Rangers? Sheriffs? Police? Highway Patrol? Militia?

  3. earthplanet
    August 21st, 2014 @ 4:56 pm

    CANT POST

  4. earthplanet
    August 21st, 2014 @ 4:58 pm

    The auto complete popup came up and prevented posting.

    Can we figure out why this woman got shot multiples times in her car with an infant in the backseat by mulitple cops.. REALLY…

    Just by visiting the nations capital one can get killed by mulitple police officers., cia, secret service, Something is not right.

    Something is not right that we are not DEMANDING THESE MUILTIPLE COPS WHO IN SOME CASES SAW THAT THERE WAS AN TODDLER IN THE BACK SEAT OF HER CAR. WHERE ARE THE NAMES FOR THESE FOLKS WHO SHOT INTO HER CAR WITH A TODDLER IN THE BACKSEAT..

    CAN WE NEVER FORGET..

    THE MIRIAM CAREY MYSTERY
    Holder AWOL for black mom killed by cops
    Justice ignores unarmed woman’s slaying by police
    Published: 24 hours ago Garth Kant About | Email | Archive Garth Kant is WND Washington news editor. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at “CNN Headline News,” three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director. He is the author of the McGraw-Hill textbook, “How to Write Television News.”
    Follow Subscribe to feed
    Text smaller
    Text bigger
    0
     
    Miriam Carey
    WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holder is in Ferguson, Missouri, ostensibly to investigate the shooting of an unarmed African-American by a white police officer.
    What he is not investigating is the shooting of an unarmed African-American woman by his own federal officers, in his own jurisdiction, the District of Columbia.
    And that has the family of the late Miriam Carey so outraged, they announced Wednesday they plan to double the amount of money in their lawsuit against the federal government to $150 million.
    While the attorney general looks for the possibility of bad intentions and a wrongful death by an officer in the Midwest, Carey family attorney Eric Sanders believes he need look no further than under his nose in Washington, D.C., where an innocent, unarmed, suburban mother was gunned down in a barrage of bullets by Holder’s officers, all because, he said, one off-duty U.S. Secret Service officer “wanted to make that b—-h pay.”
    Officer tries to block Miriam Carey from leaving White House entrance. Photo provided by U.S. Attorney’s Office.
    Those were the exact words used in a claim filed Wednesday morning by the Carey family, which serves as a prerequisite before filing a mammoth civil lawsuit against the United States, the U.S Secret Service and the U.S. Capitol Police.
    WND reported how the Carey family was outraged when, on July 10, after a more than nine-month investigation, Holder’s Department of Justice, or DOJ, declined to file any criminal charges against the federal officers who shot and killed Carey in the shadow of the nation’s Capitol on Oct. 3, 2013.
    That outrage was expressed Wednesday morning when the Carey family representative told WND they are now seeking $150 million for Miriam’s estate, her mother and her infant child, who was in the car when police repeatedly shot her.
    The Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police Department conducted the investigation into the high-speed chase and deadly shooting of Carey by U.S. Secret Service uniformed agents and U.S. Capitol Police officers. The report was then reviewed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Washington, D.C., which is part of the Justice Department.
    Not only did Holder’s DOJ decide not to file criminal charges against any of the shooters, it has not responded to Sander’s request to conduct its own investigation.
    And, in a highly unusual move, the DOJ never released that final investigative report reviewed by its U.S. Attorney. Sanders believes that’s because the facts would show the officers wrongfully killed Carey.
    Authorities also did not release video of the incident at the White House gate, only still photos. Sanders believes that video would show both the negligence of the officers on duty and that the confrontation with Carey was provoked by the off-duty officer.
    Greatly disappointed in the decision not to prosecute Carey’s killers, Sanders told WND he is also deeply disturbed by new facts in the case he has uncovered.
    He has learned that, following her autopsy, Carey’s clothes disappeared. That means they can’t be tested for gunpowder residue, an issue shown to be of such great importance in the Mike Brown shooting in Ferguson. Sanders appeared highly distressed by what could be the destruction of critical evidence in the Carey case.
    He claims her wrongful death was caused by “the unidentified aggressive Caucasian male police officers, supervisors and managers assigned to the U.S. Secret Service Uniform Division and the U.S. Capitol Police” and that “their collective actions caused Carey’s “‘avoidable’ wrongful death.”
    Sanders singled out the actions of one agent who was not in uniform, suggesting his bravado turned an innocent mistake into a deadly encounter.
    The claim filed Wednesday stated Carey, unfamiliar with the area, mistakenly drove past a White House guard post near 15th and E Streets, with her infant in the backseat in a child safety seat.
    It said she managed to get through the gate entrance only because it was “negligently maintained, covered and supervised by police officers.”
    Miriam Carey drives past two uniformed Secret Service agents while departing White House entrance. Photo provided by U.S. Attorney’s Office.
    The claim maintained Carey did not violate any Washington, D.C., or federal law because she “never intentionally entered the White House Complex” and never refused to leave. She did, in fact, try to leave but was stopped by officers.
    That meant, Sanders emphasized to WND, there was no probable cause to detain her, and there would have been no grounds to convict her of any crime.
    “After realizing her innocent mistake,” the claim reads, “Carey made a U-turn to leave the area” but “for some inexplicable reason, instead of simply allowing” her to leave, “an unidentified aggressive Caucasian Male in dark clothed civilian attire, without provocation of legal justification, intentionally, negligently and recklessly grabbed a metal police barrier and threw himself in front of her vehicle.”
    The claim identified the man as an off-duty Secret Service officer.
    It further stated, Carey then panicked because the officer startled her and endangered her safety, so she tried to go around him, but, because of the tight space, “he made contact with her vehicle.”
    The family’s bottom line: “Carey had committed no crime, thus the police had no legal basis to stop her or use any amount of physical force against her.”
    But, making a damning accusation, the claim said the off-duty officer became so “completely agitated,” he wanted to “make that b—h pay.”
    That combination of machismo and bruised ego is why, the family believes, the off-duty-officer and a parade of on-duty officers, supervisors and managers then began to pursue Carey “at high speeds, endangering their lives and the public.”
    Sanders, a former New York City Police Department officer himself, said in the claim the pursuers, “inconsistent with their police training, failed to terminate” their high-speed pursuit of the mother and child, “causing risk to them, the officers and the public” that “outweighed the benefit of investigating a harmless mistaken entrance through the White House Complex gate.”
    Once the pursuit stalled at the Garfield traffic circle, just below the Capitol, the off-duty officer approached the left side of Carey’s car, got a clear view inside, but after police vehicles inexplicably failed to box-in her car, the officer, along with the on-duty officers, fired at her as she attempted to get out of danger, striking her in the left side of the head, the back of the head and the left arm.
    That shooting by federal officers, the claim stated, was done “without establishing firearms control or legal justification” and was “inconsistent with their police training.”
    Sanders previously told WND that supervisors claimed the officers fired because Carey was driving toward people on the sidewalk, but he blasted that as either unbelievable or insane, because it would mean officers were shooting in the direction of those very people they were supposedly attempting to protect.
    According to the attorney, what authorities did reveal leaves more questions than answers. And he’s apparently not the only one who feels that way.
    Three days after authorities announced there would be no criminal charges filed, a Washington Post editorial, “Questions remain in the shooting death of Miriam Carey,” stated the decision left a critical question unanswered:
    “Was there a better, nonlethal means of dealing with the situation?”
    In other words, did officers make the wrong call?
    The answer may have to come from the now $150-million civil suit the Carey family plans to file, which could force the final investigative report on the shooting to be released as evidence.
    The defendants may try to settle the case, but Miriam’s sister, Valarie, a former NYPD sergeant, has told WND that getting to the truth is more important to the family than money.
    Miriam Carey
    Sanders said the refusal by the DOJ to release the official investigation, and an exhaustive review of all publicly available data, has convinced the Carey family the shooting was not justified.
    The suit maintains Carey was still alive after she was shot numerous times by officers then taken to a hospital, where she was pronounced dead.
    Also, according to the suit, despite being mortally wounded by gunfire during the chase, she continued driving out of panic, until she finally came to a stop and was taken from her car, a few blocks away from the initial shooting and a block from the Capitol.

  5. Jury Foreman
    August 21st, 2014 @ 5:22 pm

    Orly, Your next case,

    BREAKING: Government Report Declares Obama Broke The Law; Judge Thinks He Deserves Prison
    Judge Napolitano discussed this and believes it warrants 10 years to life in prison

    There is little question that the deal approved by Barack Obama to trade five dangerous terrorists for an Army sergeant accused of desertion struck many Americans as ill-advised and potentially dangerous.

    The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office, however, took the criticism to a higher level in a report released Thursday. By failing to give Congress 30 days’ notice before releasing the prisoners, the agency found the Defense Department in clear violation of a federal law.
    GAO: Bergdahl swap violated law – A report says the Pentagon spent $988,400 to transfer detainees to the Taliban. https://t.co/GJVjLxQ6se

    — IrritatedWoman™ (@irritatedwoman) August 21, 2014

    According to the report, “because DOD used appropriated funds to carry out the transfer when no money was available for that purpose, DOD violated the Antideficiency Act.”

    The GAO cited one specific section of the law, signed by Obama himself, it determined was violated in the widely criticized prisoners swap.

    “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act may be used to transfer any individual detained at United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity except in accordance with section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.”

    According to the report, the GAO attempted to determine when the Defense Department provided the requisite notification enumerated in section 1035; and in its response, the department indicated that it alerted Congress on the same day as Bergdahl’s release.

    “In our view, DOD has dismissed the significance of the express language enacted in section 8111,” the report concluded.
    https://www.westernjournalism.com/breaking-gao-report-finds-bergdahl-release-violated-federal-law/
    Calling the law’s mandate “clear and unambiguous,” the GAO ultimately sided with a number of critics who, from the beginning, asserted that the deal was inherently illegal.

  6. Jury Foreman
    August 22nd, 2014 @ 4:50 am

    Here is Dennis M. Lynch on Your world with Neil Cavuto, on 8-21-14

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgOYFJkfkYo&feature=youtu.be

  7. Equaljustice
    August 22nd, 2014 @ 5:05 am

    AlCapone went to jail for paying taxes so he broke the law
    “o” is a lawyer that does not know law or ignore the law.
    He is good at creating story, documents and laws.
    What a genius we have!

  8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 22nd, 2014 @ 5:56 am

    I e-mailed him, but did not hear back

  9. earthplanet
    August 22nd, 2014 @ 8:31 am

    Seems like someone made a good point about Barry.

    They exchanged 5 hard core ISIS for one deserter but left a US journalist become beheaded by ISIS.

    So when you travel to another country and Barry is playing another golf game and you are held prisoner just believe Barry will not help.. We have a country unable to help it’s American citizens abroad.. Benghazzi, The marine stuck in Mexico ..REALLY.

    Gov Jerry Brown with his delusional self is meeting with Prez of el Mexico.. This marine could have been out a long time ago if the Throwup Gov in CA could do his duty…but no..tea and crumpets while the marine rots in the el mexico hell hole. NICE..

    REALLY.. THIS PICTURE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE..

    REALLY..WHEN WILL AMERICA WAKE UP…

    WILL THERE BE JUSTICE AT 38.9071923 N , 77.03687070000001 W..TO BE ALMOST EXACT..

  10. Davey Crockett
    August 23rd, 2014 @ 11:11 am

    Hey, Holder: Dr Orly Taitz has more standing than you will ever have!!!

Leave a Reply