Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Birth Certificate Case
Posted on | June 13, 2012 | 7 Comments
WASHINGTON (AP/The Blaze) — The Supreme Court – the only legal authority with the power to directly interpret the United States constitution – has refused to hear an appeal challenging President Barack Obama’s U.S. citizenship and his eligibility to serve as commander in chief.
Without comment, the high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Alan Keyes, Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the challengers did not have legal standing to file the lawsuit. At the time, the Los Angeles Times reported that:
None of the “birthers” who filed suit on Inauguration Day 2009 can show that they suffered any harm from the Obama presidency that would give them the right to sue him, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said in dismissing the lawsuit brought by dozens of opponents.
Even the political candidates who lost to Obama in 2008 would only have had standing to sue if they had filed their complaint alleging unfair competition from an ineligible candidate before the election, the 9th Circuit judges said
Comments
7 Responses to “Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Birth Certificate Case”
Leave a Reply
June 13th, 2012 @ 6:13 am
Shame on our supreme court- they have terribly tarnished their reputation and integrity- They all took an oath to defend our constitution and have lied not only to America but to God- Our supreme court is our most prized sacred trust that has let us down- Is there one honest judge in ALL of America- that puts TRUTH before party loyalty (and money)? I think NOT-
June 13th, 2012 @ 7:34 am
It is VERY unfortunate they do NOT want to hear the truth! The founders of this country would be furious at what is happening. Orly your hard work is appreciated by lots of people and by many more if they could find out what you have been doing.
June 13th, 2012 @ 7:46 am
The High Court Jesters refuse to do a job they are paid to do. Convocation of Cowards.
June 13th, 2012 @ 9:48 am
Might it reach them again, but in a modified form, as in Indiana?
June 13th, 2012 @ 10:15 am
no, you can’t do that
June 14th, 2012 @ 12:43 pm
The United States of America, as a nation of laws not men, is no more.
June 14th, 2012 @ 9:12 pm
A thought for you Orly, something that I had thought about for a while now, tell me what you think.
As stated: “The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the challengers did not have legal standing to file the lawsuit. At the time, the Los Angeles Times reported that:
None of the “birthers” who filed suit on Inauguration Day 2009 can show that they suffered any harm from the Obama presidency that would give them the right to sue him”
Ok, no courts are listening to you because you have not shown that Obama’s presidency has harmed you even though it really has.
But what if you got some or many military people who was injured (GOD forbid) in the line of duty together to sue Obama. Would you say that they suffered harm from his presidency and that they do have legal standing to sue?