Supplemental brief Filed in the 9th circuit in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al
Posted on | June 20, 2011 | 13 Comments
Barnett, Keyes at al v Obama et al 9th circuit final supplemental brief #3
Cases 09-56827 and 10-55084
Submitted on behalf of all 40 Plaintiffs in Barnett et al v Obama et al 10-55084 Attorney Taitz represents all plaintiffs in 10-55084 Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
____________________
Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs.
Barack Obama, et al.,
Defendant-Appellee.
__________________
Supplemental brief under rule 28(J)
__________________
CSB #223433
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy
Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411
fax 949-766-7603
Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants Attention clerk of the court :
On May 2, 2011 undersigned conducted oral argument in the above captioned case in front of Honorable Justices Berzon, Fisher and Pregerson. Please, see below additional information per FRAP 28 (j).
On June 16, 2011 Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Bond v United States #09-1227 Argued February 22, 2011, decision 16, 2011.
This decision declares, that individuals have a right to enforce the 10th amendment state rights. This decision is relevant to the case at hand for following reasons:
a. In the United States of America presidential elections are conducted by individual states, through state ballots and the states are the ones vetting eligibility of different candidates to be on respective state ballots. Presidential candidate has to be a Natural born citizen based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution. Legitimacy of the state ballot and state elections is a right and a function guaranteed to the individual states based on the 10th amendment, as it is not one of enumerated powers reserved for the Federal government. No decision by Congress, no ratification by Congress can usurp such powers.
b. Plaintiffs are stating, that 2008 election was not legitimate, as Mr. Obama is not a Natural born citizen, being a child of a foreign national and not having any valid US vital records. Recent disclosure of Mr. Obama’s purported long form birth certificate shows it to be a forgery, CT Social Security number 042-68-xxxx, that he is using, was never assigned to him and there is evidence of fraud and/or forgery in his Selective Service certificate and his educational records. The Plaintiffs were denied standing and the case was dismissed. Current decision by Bond v United States gives the Plaintiffs standing to proceed. In an unanimous decision the court stated “The limitations that federalism entails are not therefore a matter of rights belonging only to the states. States are not the sole intended beneficiaries of Federalism. See New York, supra, at 181. An individual has a direct interest in objecting to laws that upset the constitutional balance between the National government and the states…”
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attorney for 40 Plaintiffs in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al 10-55084
Certificate of Service
Applicant attests and certifies that a true and correct copy of the above was served on the:
Assistant US attorneys
David dejute
roger west
(served electronically via ecf)
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attorney for all 40 plaintiffs in case 10-55084.
US Commission
on Civil Rights
624 Ninth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20425 C
Public Integrity Section
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington DC 20530-0001
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Head Office
Neuhuyskade 94
2596 XM The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0031 (70) 3268070 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531
Email: info@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas
137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 001 (514) 289-8757 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590
Email: admin@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Laura Vericat Figarola
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Secretaria Barcelona
laura_bpi@icab.es
Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª
08029 Barcelona, España
tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24
United Nations Commission for
Civil Rights Defenders
Orsolya Toth (Ms)
Human Rights Officer
Civil and Political Rights Section
Special Procedures Division
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
tel: + 41 22 917 91 51
email: ototh@ohchr.org
Signed
/s/ Orly Taitz
Dr Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity
The following transaction was entered on 06/20/2011 at 8:14:54 AM PDT and filed on 06/20/2011
| Case Name: | Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al |
| Case Number: | 10-55084 |
| Document(s): | Document(s) |
Docket Text:
Filed (ECF) Appellants Capt. Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Capt. Robin D. Biron, Col. John D. Blair, Mr. David L. Bosley, Ms. Loretta G. Bosley, Capt. Harry G. Butler, Rep. Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Thomas S. Davidson, Rep. Cynthia Davis, Matthew Michael Edwards, Lt. Jason Freese, Mr. Kurt C. Fuqua, Officer Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D. Andrew Johnson, Israel D. Jones, Timothy Jones, Alan Keyes, Ph. D., David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M. Lott, Major David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Col. Harry Riley, Sgt. Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Capt. David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Rep. Eric Swafford, Capt. Neil B. Turner, Richard E. Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope and Mark Wriggle in 10-55084, – Capt. Pamela Barnett in 09-56827 citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 06/20/2011. [7790461] [10-55084, 09-56827] (OT)
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: Barnett, Keyes at al v Obama et al 9th circuit final supplemental brief #3.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=06/20/2011] [FileNumber=7790461-0] [8884862ff8ab07df781353985ebde2f65e6e628934551f86a7cc11e9afdd7b4e755c516c41d40c593efa8a8dcb14328164c0c7df99696349beaf525189ed19e7]]
Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Kreep, Gary G.
DeJute, David A., Assistant U.S. Attorney
Mr. West, Roger E., Supervisory Attorney
Doctor Taitz, Orly, Counsel
Tucker, Christopher
The following information is for the use of court personnel:
DOCKET ENTRY ID: 7790461
RELIEF(S) DOCKETED:
DOCKET PART(S) ADDED: 7747986, 7747989, 7747988
Comments
13 Responses to “Supplemental brief Filed in the 9th circuit in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama et al”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 20th, 2011 @ 8:15 am
That appears to shoot down all the “no standing” garbage from all the courts.
All judges who used this argument should be removed from the bench asap.
June 20th, 2011 @ 8:23 am
Orly, you forgot to send this to the SPCA.
June 20th, 2011 @ 9:15 am
Woof! Woof!
June 20th, 2011 @ 9:30 am
May God save us through your work and that of many patriots who love their Nation and Constitution. This from CANADA FREE PRESS which gives much pause for thought and prayer:
————–
Obama’s ineligibility: Congress says al-Qaida terrorist can be President
There is no gray area. Either members of Congress are liars or they are too stupid to serve in government.
Senator Mark R. Warner (D-VA) says:
“The facts have consistently shown that President Obama was born in the United States. As a natural-born American citizen, he is fully eligible to serve as President of our country.”
June 20th, 2011 @ 10:20 am
Orly, you gotta be the most brilliant person I know. How do you keep coming up with these excellent findings? This info should really get these cases moving. You are my hero
June 20th, 2011 @ 11:43 am
Re: Veritas
June 20th, 2011 @ 9:30 am
May God save us through your work and that of many patriots who love their Nation and Constitution. This from CANADA FREE PRESS which gives much pause for thought and prayer:
————–
This outstsanding article can be found here:
“OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY: CONGRESS SAYS AL-QAIDA TERRORIST CAN BE PRESIDENT”
By Lawrence Sellin
June 20, 2011
https://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37705
ALL Americans, Read Lawrence Sellins’ Outstanding Articles On Obama’s 100% Legal Disqualification & 100% Criminal Ineligibility to be a USA POTUS & CIC at the link below.
Please Read About The Foreign-Born Domestic Enemy, 100% Anti-American Communist Islimasti Muslim Domestic Terrorist NWO Usurper, Barack Hussein Obama, AKA Soebarakah AKA Barry Soetoro’s 100% Daily Serial Career Criminal Activities, & Barack Hussein Obama’s 100% Anti-American, 100% NWO Communist Islamist Muslim Domestic Terrorist Usurpation Of The USA Government Here:
https://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/37705
And Here:
https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/
Obama Release Your Records:
And Here:
http://www.wnd.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dr. Orly,
Your Extremely Outstanding Work is being covered here very often!! Thank you for all of the magnificent work that you are doing!!
We The People MUST work 24/7/365 together with you to get this work done!!
Monday, June 20, 2011
“NEW COURT FILING IN KEYES/BARNETT V. OBAMA IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS”
Read More Here: https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/new-court-filing-in-keyesbarnett-v.html
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
June 20th, 2011 @ 11:56 am
The Ninth Circuit has finally decided to hear the case and they will finally rule, fore or against Orly et al. But, then their decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court – at last!
June 20th, 2011 @ 12:56 pm
Howard… the Ninth Circuit didn’t “agree” to hear the case, they had no choice but to “hear” the case when it was filed. The only choice they had was whether to grant oral argument or not, and they did as they do in virtually every case before them where the issue of standing is concerned and granted oral argument.
Of course they will rule one way or the other. It’s what they do. When they rule is anyone’s guess. They have no timetable in which they must rule.
June 20th, 2011 @ 6:09 pm
Howard, the Supreme Court is not obliged to hear any case submitted to it, unless perhaps a case from a state. Of the cases SCOTUS considers, it accepts one or two out of a hundred for oral arguments… on its own terms and for its own reasons, not because we think a case is of national importance.
June 20th, 2011 @ 9:47 pm
Hey, O.I.P.: At least his dogs have papers!
LOLOL!
And they should round you two “squirrels” up and ship you off to the “pound”! I think they would have two NEW specimens: “DNA unknown!”
So while you “side-shows” horse around, Orly is doing some real work! Your maturity is astoundingly low for adults! Where’d you learn this, in some socialist/commie nation? And…
Since I’ve seen the “worthless” poster come in here, waaay too often, I can honestly say that now I do believe in abortion! And make it “retroactive” for these “warts” of society!
June 21st, 2011 @ 2:27 pm
I read that case, Orly. Can you tell us what statute your case involves that impinges on state sovereinty? I can’t remember all the details of your Ninth District case. Thank you.
June 21st, 2011 @ 3:59 pm
Defender, I was mocking anons posting about the SPCA. No Troll here.
June 21st, 2011 @ 7:40 pm
O.I.P.: I see. Thanks for the clarification!