Docket Text:
Supplemental BRIEF Per 03.01.15 Order by Orly Taitz, filed.(bcampos, 1)
1:14-cv-00119 Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Colin Kisor colin.kisor@usdoj.gov

Daniel David Hu daniel.hu@usdoj.gov, CaseView.ECF@usdoj.gov, JJones5@usa.doj.gov, sKempen@usa.doj.gov

Kimberly E. Helvey Kimberly.E.Helvey@usdoj.gov, Kimberly.Wiggans@usdoj.gov

Orly Taitz orly.taitz@hushmail.com

Sarah B Fabian sarah.b.fabian@usdoj.gov

ORLY TAITZ, ESQ

29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688

PH 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7687

US DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

TAITZ,                      )                              Case # 14-cv-00119

 V                                )       HONORABLE ANDREW S. HANEN PRESIDING

JOHNSON, ET AL   )

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF PER 03.01.2015 ORDER

During 03.01.2015 hearing in the above captioned case, the court stated that the parties can submit additional information and argument by 03.11.2016. Accordingly, the plaintiff is providing the following information:

1. DEFENDANTS ARE ATTEMPTING TO NULLIFY DECISION BY THIS COURT BY RECLASSIFYING DISEASES OF PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE INTO DISEASES OF NO PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

This case is seeking an injunctive relief whereby the defendants, Secretary of DHS and HHS, will have to obtain medical releases, showing no infectious diseases of public significance prior to release of illegal alien detainees from the DHS and HHS custody.

Defendants are currently engaged in a trick, where they are reclassifying diseases of public significance into diseases of no public significance. This would undermine and nullify the decision by this court, should the court issue an injunction as requested by the plaintiff.

As an example, Obama administration reclassified a deadly disease, AIDS/HIV, from a disease of public significance into a disease of no public significance, even though U.S. has the largest number of cases and millions of dollars are spent on treatments. Last month three more diseases were reclassified, with Obama administration arguing that only about $100 million is spent per year to treat those diseases and this amount according to Obama administration does not constitute public significance (Exhibit 1)

Plaintiff is greatly concerned that by the end of Obama administration all of the infectious diseases will be reclassified as diseases of no public significance, including TB and Ebola.

At first blush these policies are totally unfathomable. However, one can understand the reasoning behind these decisions by looking at a greater picture.

We are seeing Obama administration releasing into the general population over 60,000 criminals after incarceration instead of deporting them. Similarly, in order to avoid deportation of illegal aliens with infectious diseases of public significance as required by 8 USC 1182, Obama administration is engaged in trickery, in reclassifying diseases into diseases of no public significance. These concerted actions remove all impediments to flooding this nation with cheap foreign labor. This appears to be a repayment by Mr. Obama to his donors, who bought his presidency for him for a total of 2 billion dollars and are seeking a payback in the form of a massive supply of cheap foreign labor.  As a consequence, the plaintiff, who is a doctor working with immigrants is exposed to multiple infectious diseases. Exposure is an injury in itself.

In order to stop this trickery, the court should specify in its’ injunction order

that:

1.  The court will issue an injunction whereby the detainees prior to their release from DHS and HHS will need to be free of diseases of public significance and the list of diseases of public significance is the one that existed on January 20, 2009, when this administration took office. Or alternatively:
2. The court will issue an injunction whereby the detainees prior to their release from DHS and HHS detention will need to be free of diseases of public significance and the list of diseases of public significance is the one that existed on July 14, 2014, when this case was filed.
3. EXPOSURE TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE IS A DAMAGE IN ITSELF

This country is watching a medical disaster in Flint, MI. A number of people were exposed to water with high concentration of lead. In the case of Flint, MI, most residents are not sick; however they are exposed to possible sickness.

Similarly, in the case at hand it was proven that the plaintiff and her staff are exposed to infectious diseases. Report of the Inspector General of DHS, that was produced previously, shows that multiple detainees have infectious diseases, including TB. The letter from the spokesperson of the local border patrol union states that the detainees with the infectious diseases were transferred from Texas to California. These detainees were placed in MediCal (Division of Medicare/Medicaid) program, where plaintiff is a doctor-provider. The plaintiff was exposed to infectious diseases. She went through months of persistent cough and bronchitis and had to have repeated X-rays and other tests due to her exposure to aforementioned immigrants, many of whom have infectious diseases, including Tuberculosis. This is a classic Roe v Wade case, where the plaintiff cannot file a separate law suit every instance she gets sick. There is an ongoing exposure to infectious diseases due to actions by the defendants and immediate risk of infection can only be alleviated through the injunction, as requested.

3. FLORES V RENO PRECEDENT SHOWS THAT THE COURT CAN AND SHOULD ISSUE THE INJUNCTION, AS REQUESTED BY THE PLAINTIFF

During March 1 hearing Hon. Judge Hanen asked if the parties already submitted to him the latest ruling in Flores v Reno and if it was not submitted previously, to submit it now. Plaintiff submits the original agreement in Flores v Reno 85-cv-4544 RJK signed 01.13.97 (Exhibit 2) and the latest 07.24.2015 decision in the case by the new judge, Dolly Ge, recent Obama appointee.

The plaintiff submits that extensive application and current overbroad interpretation of Flores v Reno and the actions by the defendants and the federal court placed her in imminent danger of contracting infectious diseases and, as such, there is a need for an injunction, which would assert that Flores v Reno agreement has to comply with all immigration laws, including 8 USC 1182, and such injunction would provide a mechanism for compliance with both 8USC 1182 and Flores v Reno.

Original agreement in 1985 merely sought to allow immigration officials to release minor illegal aliens to the custody of other relatives, not parents, while they are awaiting their deportation hearings. The rationale behind it was the fact that a number of illegal alien minors stayed in detention for a long time because their illegal alien parents were afraid to appear at the detention center to pick them up, as they knew that the whole family was likely to be deported.

President Obama, who is one of the defendants in this case, vastly expanded his interpretation and application of this relatively minor dormant agreement from 30 years ago. He used the agreement to release tens of thousands of illegal alien minors or in many instances adults, who claimed to be minors, and he transported them all over the country, providing his donors with a massive supply of cheap labor.

Further, Federal Judge, Dolly Ge, in the Central District of California, expanded this agreement by ordering immediate release from detention of all illegal alien minors together with illegal alien adults, who traveled with those minors. This expansion was done as Judge Ge felt that is not good for minors to be in detention, as they may get depressed and, of course, it is not good to release them alone without adults, who travel with them. So, as a result of this agreement the whole families, whole clans, thousands of people were released from DHS and HHS detention immediately.

So, the plaintiff submits to the court that no agreement could be approved by the court, if it violates the existing laws, as it would be pari delicto and null and void.

As such, the original agreement had to comply with all existing immigration laws, including 8USC 1182,  and all illegal aliens with infectious diseases of public significance had to be removed (deported). However, there is a great shortage of doctors, defense admitted that the detainees are not checked by doctors while in DHS and Border Patrol facilities and there are only 2 doctors for 90 HHS facilities with thousands of detainees. Defense witnesses testified that minors were released within 48 hours according to Flores v Reno, they were not checked by doctors and ones with infectious diseases were released into the general population. Plaintiff, who is a doctor working with immigrants through government programs, MediCal (Ca division of Medicare/Medicaid) ended up being in the zone of danger and is a victim, who should have been protected under 8 USC 1182.

As such, the injunction is justified and justiciable. The court will not be changing any existing laws. The court will be merely asserting that Flores v Reno agreement has to comply with 8USC 1182 and, as such, illegal aliens in DHS and HHS custody need to be checked for infectious diseases of public significance prior to their release into general population. The ones, who have infectious diseases of public significance, have to be removed in accordance with 8 USC 1182, and the rest should receive, prior to their release, a medical clearance stating that they do not have infectious diseases of public significance.

4. DEFENSE FALSIFIED THE WORDING OF THE STATUTE 8USC1226(e) IN ORDER TO CLAIM THAT THIS COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE
   Lastly, defense claims that this court does not have any jurisdiction to issue an injunction and this is flagrantly wrong. The defense stated:

“… But this Court’s July Opinion did not discuss the jurisdictional bars to injunctive relief, including 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e),

which states:

The [Secretary of DHS’s] discretionary judgment regarding the application of

[Section 1226] shall not be subject to review. No court may set aside any action or

decision by the [Secretary of DHS] under this section regarding the detention or

release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole” ECF 74 p15 12.29.15.

The plaintiff respectfully directs attention of this court to the actual true wording of 8USC 1226 e:

“ (e) Judicial review The Attorney General’s discretionary judgment regarding the application of this section shall not be subject to review. No court may set aside any action or decision by the Attorney General under this section regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole”. https://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/II/IV/1226#sthash.pA6hfWdm.dpuf

So, none of the actions in this case related to the judgment of the Attorney General.

Defense attorneys defrauded this court by providing this court with the falsified statute, where they replaced the word “Attorney General” with the word :”Secretary of DHS”. Not only the court should rule in favor of the plaintiff, the court should sanction all four government attorneys who defrauded the court and submitted to the court pleadings with a falsified wording of the statute.

What is even more egregious is that during March 1, 2016 hearing the court asked the government attorneys directly: are you telling me that nobody can sue for damages and no court can adjudicate? Let’s take a hypothetical, what if the government sets a home for Ebola patients and does not tell anybody that these are Ebola patients and let’s say the mayor of Brownsville comes to visit those people to greet them with cookies and pancakes and contracts Ebola. Are you telling me that he can’t sue and no judge can adjudicate? The response from the attorneys representing the government was: according to 8 USC 1226 they can’t and the only redress is to go to Congress to change the statute.

At all time while writing their MSJ and during the March 1, 2016 hearing the government attorneys knew that they falsified the quotation of the statute and replaced the word “Attorney General” with “Secretary of DHS”, that this statute does not relate to this case and Hon Judge Hanen actually has jurisdiction and can adjudicate the case. So, the actions by the attorneys for the government are really sanctionable. Moreover, the plaintiff was told by the court to provide information on her patients to the government and for the government to advise whether they have any matches in their records. Plaintiff was supposed to rely on the assertions by the government that they could not find any matches. If the government could change the wording of the statute, how can the government be believed in their assertions that they did not find any matching records? The assertions by the government are tainted. Wherefore, as stated previously, just as Judge Ge in Flores v Reno could issue an injunction ordering the government to release immediately the detainees, similarly, this court has jurisdiction to issue an injunction ordering defendants to comply with 8 USC 1182  and have those detainees checked for infectious diseases of public significance, remove ones who are infected and provide a medical release to ones who are released from detention into the general population.

Plaintiff respectfully submits that this brief is supplemental to all pleadings and exhibits previously submitted by her in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

03.08.2016

EXHIBIT 1

HHS: Immigrants with HIV, STDs welcome

By PAUL BEDARD (@SECRETSBEDARD) • 2/23/16 4:38 AM

The administration has decided to let immigrants with three sexually transmitted diseases known for causing sores or lesions on genitalia to enter the United States, an expansion of a previous decision to let in those with HIV.

The Department of Health and Human Services this month opened the borders to those with the STDs, deeming the communicable diseases not a big threat to the United States.

A report from the Centers for Immigration Studies said that HHS does not believe that the costs to taxpayers to handle the immigrants with STDs will be significant.

Now, said the Center, the list of inadmissible communicable diseases only includes syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, and leprosy.

“So what about the costs associated with the new rule change on the three remaining STDs? Don’t worry, Obama’s HHS secretary ran the numbers and explained in the Federal Register that, ‘The results are not economically significant, i.e. more than $100 million of costs and benefits in a single year.’ In other words, the cost of welcoming in aliens with these STDs will be below $100 million every year,” said the CIS report.

The website Law 360 first revealed the rules change. “Under the change, the STIs granuloma inguinale, chancroid and lymphogranuloma venereum would no longer be considered a ‘communicable disease of public health significance,'” said the website. Quoting HHS, it added, “The three bacterial infections are transmitted through sexual contact, have never been common in the United States and over the past two decades are observed to be increasingly rare throughout the world.”

The administration had already pulled HIV off the list of diseases that bar immigrants from coming to the U.S.

“Despite the declaration that HIV was no longer a communicable disease of public health significance, the CDC estimates that approximately 50,000 people in the United States are newly infected with HIV each year and that over 1.2 million persons in the country are HIV positive. The United States has the highest prevalence of HIV infection of any developed country,” said CIS in a report released at midnight.

The HHS rule change is set to take place in less than 60 days. HHS said that there are other diseases that demand their focus.

CIS wrote: “The administration argues that this change is beneficial because physicians who would otherwise be administering the exams ‘will be able to devote more time and training to other, more common and/or more serious health issues.’ Sound familiar? This is the same argument the Obama administration makes for directing ICE to only focus on deporting ‘the worst of the worst’ criminal aliens. By ignoring the run-of-the-mill illegal aliens, law enforcement can better focus on the most egregious offenders, they claim. But it means that plenty of dangerous aliens get a pass and it means that violence has largely become a prerequisite for immigration enforcement. Similarly, the change in STD policies means that many infections are potentially being ignored.”

Author Jon Feere added: “And not to worry, HHS also explains that these ‘primarily tropical infections can be prevented through improved personal hygiene and protected sex’ and that if you do get them, the STDs can be cured ‘with a short, uncomplicated course of antibiotic therapy.’ Hopefully they’re telling the immigrants that.”

Feere, the Center’s legal policy analyst, added, “This change in policy illustrates, once again, that increased immigration is the main goal of the Obama administration, no matter the costs. The administration itself estimates that more people will become infected and that there will be increased health care costs as a result of these changes. But obviously these are considerations that have little relevance for those with an open-border perspective.”

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hhs-immigrants-with-hiv-stds-welcome/article/2583913

30 Responses to “Supplemental brief filed by Attorney Orly Taitz in a case dealing with Obama allowing into the US thousands of illegal aliens with deadly infectious diseases”

1. Analyst...
   March 12th, 2016 @ 11:27 am

   Go Orly…I hope this will help you!

2. John
   March 12th, 2016 @ 2:18 pm

   Will this Supplemental brief extend the case out with added time for the Judge to make his decision or do you think he will make his decision final the case without it and grant you discovery? I guess time will tell, I guess I’m getting a little frustrated with our Justice system.

3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 12th, 2016 @ 4:01 pm

   he said he will issue his ruling shortly

4. Maccabee
   March 12th, 2016 @ 7:07 pm

   1. Mr. Obama directs the policies of DHS to spread dangerous infectious diseases via releasing infected illegal immigrants into US population. This causes harm to medical services providers such as Dr. Taitz.

   2.She is obligated to provide such services. She has experienced the symptoms of such diseases from the illegals she has treated. She has also undergone medical diagnostic examinations and treatments.

   3. Releasing any quantities of infected illegal immigrants into the mass of US population is far from innocuous act. It is an act of treason towards USA. The source of this activity is Mr. Obama and the manager of this activity is DHS.

   4. What is the effective way of handling treason of this kind?

   5. Since the source of the problem is Mr. Obama, the normal process of rectification of this issue appears to be impeachment. It does not seem to be practical, though, since the population already experiencing inflectional diseases from illegal immigrants for 7 years in addition to rapes, murders and other acts of terror.

   6. However, Mr. Obama is an illegal Federal Employee who has not confirmed his identity as well as he has not proved to the public, Congress, and to any Federal or State Court that he satisfies the Constitutional requirements for being POTUS and for occupying the office in the White House.
   This makes Mr. Obama occupation of the office in WH illegal.

   This are facts in the public view.

   7. Because of the above circumstances of occupying WH illegally, Mr. Obama is an illegal Federal Employee. Therefore, Mr. Obama is subject to Federal Code concerning dismissal of illegal Federal Employees.

   8. That is, actually, impeachment does not directly apply to Mr. Obama. But the Federal Code for dismissing Illegal Federal employees does apply to Mr. Obama.

   9. This idea was well articulated in the article in (www.NewsWithViews.com) by Dr. Edwin Vieira.
   The Title is: IS Impeachment The Answer Part 2, December 15, 2014.

   10. The following Federal Code that stipulates the dismissal of Mr. Obama from his office in WH:

   “Title 18, United States Code, Section 912 provides that “[w] however falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer * * * acting under the authority of the United States * * * , and acts as such, or in such pretended capacity demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than three years, or both”.”

   11. Judge Hanen needs to consider the above facts in connection with the lawsuit.

5. John
   March 12th, 2016 @ 8:42 pm

   Theft of my Donald Trump signs, yeah another Democrat payed me a visit the other night and stole my DT sign. But little did they know it was all recorded on video. He! He!

6. Maccabee
   March 12th, 2016 @ 8:56 pm

   1. Mr. Obama directs the policies of DHS to spread dangerous infectious diseases via releasing infected illegal immigrants into US population. This causes harm to medical services providers such as Dr. Taitz. She is obligated to provide such services. She has experienced the symptoms of such diseases from the illegals she has treated. She has also undergone medical diagnostic examinations and treatments.
   2. Releasing any quantities of infected illegal immigrants into the mass of US population is far from innocuous act. It is an act of treason towards USA. The source of this activity is Mr. Obama and the manager of this activity is DHS. What is the effective way of handling treason of this kind?
   3.Since the source of the problem is Mr. Obama, the normal process of rectification of this issue appears to be impeachment. It does not seem to be practical, though, since the population already experiencing inflectional diseases from illegal immigrants for 7 years in addition to rapes, murders and other acts of terror.
   4.However, Mr. Obama is an illegal Federal Employee who has not confirmed his identity as well as he has not proved to the public, Congress, and to any Federal or State Court that he satisfies the Constitutional requirements for being POTUS and for occupying the office in the White House. This makes Mr. Obama occupation of the office in WH illegal. This are facts in the public view.
   5.Because of the above circumstances of occupying WH illegally, Mr. Obama is an illegal Federal Employee. Therefore, Mr. Obama is subject to Federal Code concerning dismissal of illegal Federal Employees. That is, actually, impeachment does not directly apply to Mr. Obama. But the Federal Code for dismissing Illegal Federal employees does apply to Mr. Obama.
   6. This idea was well articulated in the article in (www.NewsWithViews.com) by Dr. Edwin Vieira. The Title is: IS Impeachment The Answer Part 2, December 15, 2014.
   7.The following Federal Code that stipulates the dismissal of Mr. Obama from his office in WH: “Title 18, United States Code, Section 912 provides that “[w] however falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer * * * acting under the authority of the United States * * * , and acts as such, or in such pretended capacity demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than three years, or both”.”
   8.Judge Hanen needs to consider the above facts in connection with the lawsuit.

7. Ron (Dallas)
   March 13th, 2016 @ 1:51 pm

   GO ORLY!

8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 13th, 2016 @ 6:08 pm

   thank you, please, consider donating to my work

9. EyeballNews
   March 14th, 2016 @ 6:39 am

   +1 Maccabee!

10. X-Files...
    March 14th, 2016 @ 1:32 pm

    Wow! I’m always praying for you, Orly, and all your cases!

    And let me say this…

    Anyone who knows about your site and your tireless work, to SAVE America from this treason we face and…who doesn’t donate, if they have some $$…

    These people don’t deserve to live in a FREE SOCIETY!

    Not all of us are wealthy, but one can send something, if it’s possible?! So…

    Please keep praying for Dr Orly Taitz and also pray for her cases, and pray for America and for Trump to win the election!

    And God help Cruz/Rubio/Kasich/NWO types: if they try something to stop the [will of the people]!!!

11. WALLYnWV
    March 14th, 2016 @ 4:33 pm

    This is a serious question. Has Trump approached you for the VP job? If not, he should.

12. WALLYnWV
    March 14th, 2016 @ 4:38 pm

    If not VP, you would make a great Attorney General. You could go after the crooked politicians that got the our country into this mess.

13. Joseph Flaviy
    March 14th, 2016 @ 8:02 pm

    1. Mr. Obama Administration does not uphold the existing laws, including Immigration laws.

    2. Mr.O Administration has not honored Judge Hanen injunctions in the past.

    3. Mr. Obama Administrations arbitrarily classifies diseases as infection diseases not by means of medical definition, but by means of whether the Government spends more than $100 million dollars on them. Thereby Mr. Obama Administration substitutes the meaning of the term “infectious disease” by the meaning that has never been in use in USA prior to Mr. Obama Administration emergence in 2008.

    4. The Defense attorneys of this Administration mislead Judge Hanen by falsifying the wordings of the status of the law to make DHS Secretary Directives appear to not be a subject of a scrutiny by any Judge. That is, the defense making it appear that Judge Hanen is powerless to act to restrain DHS Secretary actions. Thus the Defense acts in criminal manner in addition to the criminal manner in which Mr. Obama Administration and DHS Secretary act.

    5.Judge Hanen cannot address the unprecedented criminality of Mr. Obama Administration and its Defense in this lawsuit by asking the Defense what the Defense think the Judge Hanen’s options are in order to restrain this Criminal Cartel.

    6. The judge has to look at the options himself. One of such options is spelled out by the poster #4, Mr. Maccabee.

14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 14th, 2016 @ 10:51 pm

    I am not a natural born US citizen, can never be a VP. You know it

15. Rhonelle
    March 15th, 2016 @ 2:43 am

    WALLYnWV may be kidding you about VP but, seriously, what about a cabinet position? AG is a natural, but there could be others. If Trump has not been in touch, I hope he will be as soon as he wins Florida. You are doing so much for him.

16. taino21
    March 15th, 2016 @ 8:05 am

    Our judicial system has become so corrupt and until some of these judges are held accountable is not going to change. How these criminals can get away with it it’s beyond my comprehension. They say, WE THE PEOPLE, have no standing when we pay every single one of them their salaries, that in it self should give every tax paying citizen standing. They are our employees but, are telling us we have no business suing them when they don’t or won’t do their jobs. Only in America.

17. EyeballNews
    March 15th, 2016 @ 11:41 am

    Attorney General or Supreme Court + Orly = Great idea!

18. EyeballNews
    March 15th, 2016 @ 11:48 am

    If they reclassify AIDS/HIV as being insignificant, then does that mean all the research funding will also be cut?

    Also, I checked the CDC web site and looked at TB trends. Apparently, they only published data through 2014 which showed a downtrend in new cases. Could they be holding back new data which shows recent increases due to lax border policies?

19. Starlight
    March 15th, 2016 @ 12:46 pm

    taino21…it will take a grassroots non-violent, but determed revolution, to rid us of the corruption backed up by monitored and supervised voting … my observation is that the demonstrations against Mr. Trump, are a. being committed by the ignorant and the illegals,

    and b. this alone indicates what the United States would have in store for its future, should the bad guys win the election.

    We would be under a dictatorship run by delusional, insane citizens as well as illegal criminals, not to mention the now “legal and educated” employees of the contemporary justice system, which in its corruption is designed to bring down America, and oppress its law-abiding citizens.

    I watched briefly Trump on Hannity’s show, in North Carolina, a couple of nights ago, and everyone in the audience was well-dressed, well-mannered, wholesome and definitely the opposite of those who are non-supporters, assaulting, wreaking havoc on their ‘enemies’ (us)

    It is not just black against white, for many black people do have a sense of decency and dignity, know what the handwriting on the wall is, and that our country is in grave danger, especially if someone as dedicated and patriotic as Mr. Trump is, should be fraudulently elected.

    My feeling is that the majority of Americans know exactly what is down the pike, know the opponents must NOT win, and that they feel helpless to remedy the situation when faced with criminal actions against them and against Mr. Trump.

    It is outrageous to place the blame on Mr. Trump for his enemies’ violent behaviour. This is a case of desperation on their part; they, too, see the writing on the wall, and know they are doomed should he win the election, and we finally have a true blue president salvaging what is left of this country’s morals and liberties.

    From the standpoint of the patriots, these demonstrators only make it more evident that evil abounds and ‘good’ must rise to the fore, and that Mr. Trump, a forceful and non-intimidated man, will be their own worse enemy, if he is, by God’s will, elected to bring us out of this morass.

20. Starlight
    March 15th, 2016 @ 12:51 pm

    I have to clarify.. I did not mean “Mr. Trump should be fraudulently elected.”

    I meant that if someone OTHER THAN Mr. Trump, who is dedicated and patriotic, is fraudulently elected.

    My thoughts were way behind my typing prowess… lol

21. WALLYnWV
    March 15th, 2016 @ 5:31 pm

    I wasn’t kidding at all about the VP position, I just wasn’t thinking and forgot about the natural born citizen applying to VP because the VP could wind up being president. My mistake was an oversight. Attorney General would be better anyway. Could do more for the country as the AG.

22. John
    March 16th, 2016 @ 7:13 am

    Look at what LA County Coroner just did, he quit his job.
    Follow the money: Los Angeles is a sanctuary city. As of a 2013 report, 1 in 10 residents of LA was an illegal alien, and children of illegal aliens in LA County cost the county more than $54 million per MONTH in welfare. Add public safety and healthcare, projected annual cost is $650 million. Cost of education not included.

    https://dennismichaellynch.com/highlight-one/la-county-coroner-quits-in-sanctuary-city-los-angeles/

23. John
    March 16th, 2016 @ 10:02 am

    So, Here we go again. Another Illegal Alien committing crimes against our citizens and the Government looks the other way, here is the full story of the mass shooting in Kansas and Missouri,

    https://dailysignal.com/2016/03/16/how-a-suspected-murderer-and-criminally-convicted-illegal-immigrant-avoided-deportation/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=morningbell&mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonu6jIdu%2FhmjTEU5z16u8tWKWzhokz2EFye%2BLIHETpodcMTcdlN7DYDBceEJhqyQJxPr3NLtQN191pRhLiDA%3D%3D

24. DSP2
    March 17th, 2016 @ 2:23 pm

    This is anarchy at the hands of the federal government. Maybe a protest at the capitol with jars of pig’s blood tossed at these complicit SOB’s might just get the message through their corrupt heads. Innocent American citizens are dying at the hands and decisions of OUR government. The Obama administration, DHS, DOJ, ICE, SSA, IRS all have their bloody hands in this.

25. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:04 pm

    Rep. Trey Gowdy, Today I testified before the House Rules Committee in support of a resolution allowing the Speaker of the House to file an amicus brief in the Supreme Court litigation United States v. Texas, which questions the constitutionality of President Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) policy. Watch my opening statement.
    https://youtu.be/91oaLzYDG94
    The President Does Not Make Law

    Are the Republicans finally waking up!, Paul Ryan just got congress to back the Texas case, Republicans Just Took A HUGE Stand to STOP Obama’s Lawless Executive Orders.

    On Thursday, the House took a major step against President Obama’s executive amnesty plan by passing a vote seeking redress from the Supreme Court.
    The passage of this vote will allow Speaker Ryan to file an amicus brief with the Supreme Court, enabling Congress to join a lawsuit which has already been filed by Texas and two dozen other states. The lawsuit would require Obama to fulfill his duties as president and begin deportation of over 4 million illegal immigrants, which he has vowed he would not deport.

    Chairman Gowdy: One person doesn’t make law!
    https://youtu.be/rdjY33RHrtQ

26. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:13 pm

    Here is the full story,

    https://www.teaparty.org/house-just-took-huge-stand-supreme-court-stop-obama-149879/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=house-just-took-huge-stand-supreme-court-stop-obama

27. John
    March 19th, 2016 @ 7:30 pm

    Monday March 21st 2016 Washington, D.C. Future President Donald J. Trump meets with members of Congress. At 2:15pm he will hold a press conference from the Old Post Office.

    https://www.teaparty.org/trump-to-meet-with-gop-leaders-to-mend-fences-149871/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=trump-to-meet-with-gop-leaders-to-mend-fences

    I wonder what’s going on?

28. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 20th, 2016 @ 6:45 am

    I am afraid that either Kennedy or Roberts will flip

29. Trump Supporter
    March 21st, 2016 @ 4:19 pm

    I hope Orly is successful in her cases and also hope that Trump can also show the Url that Paula Hoehn posted…so they can actually see that Cruz is NOT eligible to run for the Oval Office!

    Cruz is playing around with his future!

    And he is also taking some votes away from Trump with his still being in the race!

    And Kasich is also not helping America, by still being in the race, as well.

    Both are NWO, IMO!

30. John
    March 21st, 2016 @ 8:38 pm

    Well I just found out why the Donald met with some members of Congress today. The answer to my question above .

    Announcement: Congress has informed Donald J. Trump that Articles of Impeachment proceedings are being brought forward in the coming days for B. Obama. aka Barry Soetoro.

    More to come folks stand by. The SHTF and it doesn’t look good for the Democrats.

Leave a Reply