OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Strategy to get to the Supreme Court immediately: AG of TX and other 29 GOP AGs can sue the State of NY and other defendants and can go directly to the Supreme Court under Article III, Section 2, Clause 1

Posted on | June 13, 2024 | 3 Comments

Strategy to get to the Supreme Court immediately: AG of TX and other 29 GOP AGs can sue the State of NY and other defendants and can go directly to the Supreme Court under Article III, Section 2, Clause 1

By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

06.13.2024

We all know that Donald Trump’s constitutional rights to defend himself in a fair trial were taken away in New York courtroom. A criminal defendant is entitled to which crime he is accused of committing. He is entitled to have the jury deciding unanimously on a specific crime. In New York the District Attorney Alvin Bragg brought charges against Trump on an expired misdemeanor, elevating it to a crime without explanation which crime is this misdemeanor connected to. More lawless and outrageous  were actions by an acting (temporary judge Merchan, where he told the jurors that they can agree on a one out of 4 crimes without agreeing which one.

All the legal scholars agree that these actions were totally lawless, a political hit job by a biased judge to be able to call Trump a convicted felon to throw the presidential election. Most scholars are at a loss, how can this case be brought to the Supreme Court quickly before the election. Below is my solution. It might be innovative, a “case of first impression”, but it will bring the case in front of the Supreme Court quickly before the election.

Constitution tasks the Supreme Court with handling disputes between state governments in Article III, Section 2, Clause 1:

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State, between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

So, here is the solution. One or more attorneys of red states, such as Texas and 29 others, can file a legal action directly in the Supreme Court against the State of New York, with additional defendants being Bragg and Merchan, alleging that the citizens of those conservative states are deprived of an ability to vote for and elect Trump, that the state of New York via manipulations by the state employees, Judge Merchan and DA Bragg deprived the states of a fair presidential election.

Firstly, Bragg filed charges without naming a crime to which the expired misdemeanor was elevated, depriving the presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump of his constitutional rights under

18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

Further, employees of the Superior court instead of using a blind drawing, have intentionally steered all cases involving prominent Republicans, Donald Trump and the Trump organization to one highly partisan and biased judge, Juan Merchan, whose daughter is raising millions for the Democrats and whose wife worked for AG Leticia James.

Lastly, Merchan deprived Trump’s rights and vicariously the rights of the Republican voters in Texas and all over  the country to be a part of a fair election, when their candidate was falsely convicted and labeled a convicted felon.

By and through its employees and officials the State of New York has deprived the citizens of other states of their rights to a lawful and fair election.

Based on all of the above, Texas and other states are justified in bringing directly to the Supreme Court a legal action against the State of New York and its officials State court judge Merchan, DA Bragg and State Superior court employees who manipulated the docket.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Strategy to get to the Supreme Court immediately: AG of TX and other 29 GOP AGs can sue the State of NY and other defendants and can go directly to the Supreme Court under Article III, Section 2, Clause 1”

  1. Frank
    June 13th, 2024 @ 8:48 am

    SCOTUS rejected a similar kind of claim in 2021 that was brought by Texas and others, alleging that changes to voting rules prejudiced their citizens. So this will go the same way. Plus Trump will be on the ballot regardless of conviction and sentence so there is no harm.

  2. michael
    June 22nd, 2024 @ 4:19 pm

    Class Action ! We the People need to collectively file a RICO Action.

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 15th, 2024 @ 8:01 am

    prior case had a different argument

Leave a Reply