Announcing it’s “not her lucky day,” a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has told an eligibility attorney he has dismissed her case demanding information from the Social Security Administration regarding President Obama’s Social Security number, sought because of suspicions it may be fraudulent.

The case was filed by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has battled many of the major court challenges to Obama’s eligibility based on a lack of evidence that he qualifies under the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.”

Jerome Corsi’s New York Times best-seller, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”, which addresses Obama’s Social Security Number, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

The case at hand was filed against the Social Security Administration because Obama’s number indicates a Connecticut residency, yet there is no evidence he ever lived in the state. He claims he grew up in Hawaii and apparently had a Social Security number there, as he reported he worked in a Honolulu ice-cream shop.

There has been no evidence he ever lived in Connecticut, and investigators have described the circumstances as suspicious.

The judge, Royce Lamberth credits Taitz for her dedication to her cause, but boasted that “today is not her lucky day.”

(Story continues below)

He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.

“The SSA explained that the Privacy Act of 1974 … protects the personal information of social security number holders,” he wrote. “The SSA determined … the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure.”

“Plaintiff makes no secret of her intention to use the redacted Form SS-5 to identify the holder of social security number xxxx-xxx-4425 – or, as plaintiff puts it, to confirm her suspicion that the president is fraudulently using that number,” the judge wrote.

But Lamberth wrote in the case against Michael Astrue, Social Security commissioner, whether Obama is using a fake number isn’t his concern.

“Even if plaintiff’s allegations were true, an individual’s status as a public official does not, as plaintiff contends, ‘make exemption 6 irrelevant to him and his vital records.'”

He said he would “disregard” documents from the Selective Service and the Social Security Number Verification System suggesting there are problems with Obama’s number because he “concludes” they were obtained “under false pretenses.”

Taitz told WND she is submitting a motion for reconsideration based on new evidence that includes an affidavit from an individual who obtained a government affirmation that the number Obama is using doesn’t match his name.

She said it is important to the public because it could provide evidence of fraudulent IRS returns, fake election documents and Social Security fraud, should the allegations prove accurate.

See a video report:

Taitz also has filed a state court action on similar grounds in the state of Hawaii, where there had been a hearing scheduled in September on orders from a federal judge to address the state’s refusal to comply with a subpoena for Obama’s original birth documentation.

Her Petition for Writ of Mandamus, if granted, would require the state Department of Health to turn over to her the original 1961 Obama birth records the agency has kept from the American public.

A mandamus action is something to compel an official or government officer to perform a duty demanded by the petitioner. And in this situation, the case is in support of her subpoena for the birth records for the president.

In submitting the Writ of Mandamus, Taitz filed 48 pages of pleadings and exhibits before Circuit Court Judge Rhonda Nishimura.

It is separate from the Astrue case, which she said would be appealed.

Taitz has maintained that by releasing his long-form birth certificate to the American public on April 27, Obama has waived all privacy restrictions that would prevent the Hawaii DOH from making public the original 1961 birth records the agency has on file.

“I decided to file the state case for mandamus because this is a separate case that stands on its own,” Taitz told WND.

Taitz charged that if the long-form birth certificate the White House released on April 27 is not on file in a 1961 original copy in the Hawaii DOH, then a criminal felony has been created.

“I don’t believe there is any 1961 typewritten birth certificate document for Obama on file in the Hawaii DOH that looks anything like what the White House released,” she asserted. “Why else would the Hawaii DOH fight me so hard to keep us from seeing whatever birth records are on file?”

Read more: Judge rules on Obama’s Social Security number https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=339629#ixzz1WcUihsrb 

11 Responses to “some 500 readers posted remarks of outrage over ruling of a judge, who stated, thatUS citizens have no interest in knowing, whether their president is using a stolen Social Security number from a state, where he never resided”

1. RacerJim
   August 31st, 2011 @ 8:41 am

   “He [the civilian Judge in this case] concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.”

   Sound familiar? It should.

   She [the military Judge in LTC Lakin’s Courts Martial] determined that the president was not in LTC Lakin’s Chain of Command therefore concluding that LTC Lakin had no basis for discovery pertaining to Obama’s vital records, and the need to prevent embarrassing the president trumps all else.

2. Yephora
   August 31st, 2011 @ 10:01 am

   So ‘Today’s not her lucky day’? Well your Honor, when the system you are helping corrupt collapses it’s going to collapse on top of you as well as the rest of us. Then it will be nobody’s lucky day.

3. George Anderson
   August 31st, 2011 @ 10:16 am

   Jesus, this is sad, jut sad.

   Orly, it might be time for us to move back to Russia, where freedom is on about the same level as here. Truly sad. A friend has had her 6 yr old daughter’s SSN stolen by an illegal alien and the government won’t do anything about that either. Maybe it’s time for ALL of us to stop paying taxes? What is there to do? I am not going to make any more serious suggestions. But I do think all is now lost for our once great country. 🙁

4. John Martin
   August 31st, 2011 @ 10:49 am

   Commisar Lambreth has revealed his true colors. Common sense and the oath he took to protect and defend the constitution mean nothing to him. He deserves the wrath of the people, along with the rest of this faux administration
   The great pretender and untold numbers of his family are here illegaly, no wonder there is such a push for amnesty.
   The legal system is a farce. Elections and the courts are bought and paid for.
   May God grant you strength to continue the fight and reclaim our Constitutional Republic.

5. Barb
   August 31st, 2011 @ 12:10 pm

   I just finished David Barton’s 5 judicial myths CD. Lifetime appointments are only lifetime for the term of good behavior. Usurping the constitution is not good behavior. He states that the people have the right to petition the house of representatives to impeach any judge for lack of good behavior. He says maybe if we start petitioning judges to be impeached (even if they are not) judges will start to act like judges. Maybe we need to start petitions to the house to impeach certain judges.

6. Jerry
   August 31st, 2011 @ 1:26 pm

   So called Judge Lamberth revealed his bias and his animosity toward Orly,a true patriot, by saying that today was not her lucky day. What a dumb thing for a supposedly intelligent person to say. (And put into a legal record)Orly didn’t buy a lottery ticket with the hope of making a fortune. She wanted to get to the bottom of apparently illegal behavior of a sitting president.

7. Mycroft Holmes
   August 31st, 2011 @ 4:43 pm

   Are you going to request Judge Lamberth step down and not preside over any more proceedings involving you when you file your motion to reconsider? Also, can you tell us what the new evidence is?

8. JC
   August 31st, 2011 @ 5:29 pm

   Not to get off on a rant, but it is pretty freaking sad when a patriot makes an honest effort to support and defend the Constitution (not for any profit or fame), and takes massive abuse from thousands of hateful, abusive, ignorant people whose rights she is actually working to protect under the 1st Amendment. Maybe Judge Lambert should step back and reconsider ridiculing an American who thinks that respect for the Constitution is something more than a cheap punch line for his witty lottery ticket jokes. Lots of better Americans than him (or me) have given their lives (and will probably again tonight on some lonely hilltop in Afghanistan) for what he seems see as some silly concepts expressed with some words written a few hundred years ago. I hope he has a real nice meal tonight on the taxpayers dime, and a good laugh with all his intellectual friends about how he slapped down some lawyer (who was working in her second language) for trying to do the big, ugly, hard job of supporting and defending the Constitution that “we the people” hired him to do.

9. The Truth
   August 31st, 2011 @ 6:32 pm

   Keep chipping away Orly. Even though this is a setback, its only temporary.
   I’m starting to see chinks in their armor. Someone will crack soon. I’m sure of it.
   You see, our side grows stronger and gains support daily by spreading the truth. Their side grows weaker and looses, because they try to hide that truth. It is as plain as day.
   One of their people will double cross them soon. Someone with access to incriminating information.Where’s Julian Asange from Wikileaks when you need him?

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 31st, 2011 @ 8:37 pm

    people should write to him

11. kelley
    September 13th, 2011 @ 7:00 pm

    Orly, I called Judge Lamberth and I asked for the entire transcript telling them I had to read it to believe it. They sent it to me and I’m still in shock. He needs to be removed from the bench as far as I’m concerned. No public interest, imagine that!

Leave a Reply