Read the case below, see how AL Supreme Court works. Demand honest service from Arpaio, demand that he abide by his oath of office and file a criminal complaint against Obama and his accomplices
Posted on | May 6, 2013 | 11 Comments
WND and ORYR are posting articles saying that Sheriff Arpaio is going to get involved in the oral argument in Obama eligibility case, which is on appeal before the Supreme Court of AL.
I posted here a decision by the AL Supreme Court, which was just released. It is a different case but it shows you how the court works. AL Supreme Court, as 49 other Supreme Courts, are looking at the evidence that was in front of the trial court in deciding whether the judge in the lower court, the trial court, erred in granting his decision based on the evidence that he had at a time.
Oral argument in any Supreme Court of any State is extremely rare. Less than one percent of any cases goes for oral argument and typically it is to clarify the points of law. No witnesses are allowed during those arguments, no new testimony is allowed. Arpaio and attorneys in AL case know it. Democratic party of AL filed an Amicus brief. The courts rarely even look at Amicus Briefs. Amicus briefs are briefs of the friends of the court and typically those briefs include argument on the points of law considered in the lower court. No new evidence brought in the Amicus briefs, such as one produced by the Democratic Party of AL, are ever considered.
In the lower court the case by McInnish and Good was dismissed after the Sec of State of AL Beth Chapman argued via her motion to dismiss that she had no duty to demand the certified birth certificate for Obama and that the case is moot. Supreme Court will decide whether she had to request a certified copy of Obama’s BC and whether the matter was moot. They will not address any other arguments, any new facts or any new testimony.
As I wrote before, I hope they will rule in favor of the plaintiffs/ appellants and will reverse the decision and will remand the case to the lower court. However, there are 2 concerns.
First: so far there are only 2 friendly judges: Roy Moore and Tom Parker. 2 our of 9 is not a majority. Let’s say there will be a majority and 5 out of 9 decide in favor of the plaintiffs and remand the case to the lower court.
Second: The only thing the plaintiffs asked in their original complaint, was for a Sec of State to request a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate. The problem is that they did not request expert examination of the original, they did not request the original microfilm. Even if the case is remanded to the lower court, the same Alvin Onaka who refused to produce the original birth certificate in my cases will simply produce a certified copy of the same forgery created on computer in 2011. Not only it will not help us, it will throw us back. It will be heralded as a great victory for Obama.
Third: if you noticed, arpaio himself nver said anything. He is using his proxy, Mike Zullo, who is not even employed by the Sheriff’s department, who is just a volunteer with the cold case posse to make claims. ORYR an WND are not saying that they interviewed Arpaio, they are saying that they heard something posted on other blogs, such s PPSimmons-Carl Galllups. Why didn’t WND, which claimd to be a reputable Internet publication, interview Arpaio directly and ask: how can you get involved in AL Supreme Court, where no new testimony is allowed and why didn’t you file a criminal complaint in the county where you are a sheriff and have a duty to file? You can see one big scheme, where a number of people are doing PR and fundraising, but nothing of substance is being done.
For that reason sheriff Arpaio needs to stop this utter nonsense of claiming that he will help in the AL Supreme court, and needs to do what he is supposed to do as a sheriff. He is supposed to file a criminal complaint in his own county, in Maricopa county AZ. He is supposed to file a fraud, elections fraud, use of forged IDs and RICO, racketeering complaint against Obama and his accomplices: Registrar Onaka, Commissioner of Social Security Astrue and others. This complaint is supposed to be filed by Arpaio with the District Attorney and Attorney General of of AZ. District attorney of Maricopa County or attorney General of AZ in turn will file a criminal complaint in court on behalf of people of AZ against Barack Obama and his accomplices. In this case Arpaio and his investigators would be able to testify and Onaka will have to produce the original documents. This is something that should be done by each and every sheriff and District Attorney and Attorney General around the country.
Call WND, ORYR and Carl Gallops from PPSimmons and tell them to stop peddling nonsense and start asking Arpaio and his investigator Zullo tough questions: why didn’t they file the criminal complaint for over a year? Why are they just talking instead of filing the criminal complaint.
I received e-mails from people stating that Arpaio and Zullo went to either DA or AG and those were not interested in filing criminal charges against Obama, they don’t want to get involved in this. Well, this is just more talk and hearsay. First, we do not know if they really went to the DA and AG. Even if they went to talk, it is a joke. Arpaio is a sheriff. His job is not to go to just talk. His job is to file a signed, dated and stamped criminal complaint. He needs to do it and show the public a copy of the complaint that he filed. If DA and AG of AZ refuse to act on it, we can actually file a Civil RICO against the District Attorney and Attorney General of AZ, we can file legal actions alleging violation of civil rights under the color of authority, violation of the oath of offfice and denial of honest services by the DA and AG. In my opinion at this time the only one who is violating his oath of office, is Arpaio himself, as he has all the evidence in front of him. Through his puppet Zullo he is doing PR and advertising, stating that he has a probable cause, that the documents are forgeries, yet he is only involved in fundraising, but he is not filing criminal charges, as he is supposed to do. In my opinion the one who is denying us honest service, who is complicit in the cover up is Arpaio.
I am asking members of the AZ tea party to stage a protest in front of Arpaio’s office with slogans: “Arpaio, abide your oath of office, file a criminal complaint against Obama and his accomplices based on the evidence you have”
Comments
11 Responses to “Read the case below, see how AL Supreme Court works. Demand honest service from Arpaio, demand that he abide by his oath of office and file a criminal complaint against Obama and his accomplices”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 6th, 2013 @ 9:29 am
Dr. Taitz – I just posted this on Carl Gallops Facebook wall
May 6th, 2013 @ 10:42 am
sounds like nothinng will happen but at least jackass might have to face the music on benghazi
May 6th, 2013 @ 11:53 am
as I said previously, false allegations during a divorce are common. I believe that if Klayman were to actually commit crimes he would have been criminally prosecuted. I tend to believe that he was wrongfully accused during a bitter divorce. This is my personal opinion.
While I might disagree with Larry Klayman on some other issues, I do not believe that he is guilty in this case
May 6th, 2013 @ 12:00 pm
I’m laughing hysterically at the reports by WND & ORYR that Arpaio is going to do what??
Call me when this happens.. Remember the country area code first…
My new cell Indonesian phone number is ..
Dial 0-911-04-268-4425 and let me know when Arpaio files a complaint so I can stop laughing..
Thanks..
0 – Nobody’s home at the FBI, CIA or DHS
911 – Boston Massacre & of course Benghazi
042-68-4425 – Barry (Middle name – Harrison J Bounel)Soetoro
My laughing has now turned into crying, wailing and nashing of teeth.
OBADIAH CHAPTER ONE – This one is for you Barry and Michelle..FBI, CIA, DHS and People in Black robes who call themselves judges but are corrupt.
2 The Lord says, “Look! I will make you a weak nation;
you will be greatly despised!
3 Your presumptuous heart has deceived you—
you who reside in the safety of the rocky cliffs,
whose home is high in the mountains.
You think to yourself,
‘No one can bring me down to the ground!’
4 Even if you were to soar high like an eagle,
even if you were to make your nest among the stars,
I can bring you down even from there!” says the Lord.
May 6th, 2013 @ 2:17 pm
Orly have you seen the article from the National Archives in London. It shows Obama sr had a son born in Kenya on Aug. 4th 1961.There seems to be a micro film that IDs Obama jr but it was sealed some time in 2009. It appears that on a trip to Africa Hillary Clinton made a side trip to London at the time the Micro Film was sealed. I wonder if anyone seen or made a copy of the film before it was sealed.
May 6th, 2013 @ 2:43 pm
this article has been going around for a year, but no actual document. Contact British National archives and see if you can get the actual document
May 6th, 2013 @ 2:45 pm
Please publish the court dates in every response made on this blog
Thanks
May 6th, 2013 @ 5:27 pm
This was a good clarification on how the case in Alabama may not go anywhere. For sure the Obot laywers could certainly use the technicalities of what you just presented. I could even hear the obot lawyers making arguments (written or oral) in some form to the Judges that if this was a serious crime being committed here. “THEN WHY HAS NOT SHERIFF Arpaio not file a criminal complaint in the state of his elected jurisdiction?
They would simple say the very things you pointed out. For it would fall under as you say “typically those briefs include argument on the points of law considered in the lower court”
I do not see how Larry Klayman can pull off this idea of having the new evidence brought in.
But I do know this that Judge Roy Moore will do the right thing.
Again I will not rule out that there can be some technicallity (some unknown Alabama law)that Chief Justice Roy Moore could use (if the majority ruling is in his) if possible he could order that a crimnal investigation by his own county sheriff because in this appeal process evidence was not give to the lower court that should have been.
Ok it may sound like wishful thinking but again will are going to lose some honest Judges for the fight for the truth if nothing will come of this ruling.
May God still Bless the Alabama Surpreme Court in doing the best and right thing.
May 6th, 2013 @ 6:08 pm
Yes, Arpaio Cold Case Posse DEFINITELY needs to formally bring their case to AG, prosecutors, FBI, Congress. Otherwise, what was all that work and money for?
May 6th, 2013 @ 11:35 pm
George, the FBI and Congress are all in on the cover up.
May 7th, 2013 @ 9:00 am
It’s a hopeless task, Orly.
Arpaio and Zullo announced OVER 18 MONTHS AGO that they had all the facts, and were going to pursue Obama.
We’ve been waiting more than 550 days, and they have done nothing. Arpaio has laid no charges, presented no case, and achieved no results. None. Nothing.
It’s like Trump. We remember. Over two years ago he grandly announced that he had sent his “investigators” to Hawaii. Then he said their findings were “explosive”. Then, he promised he was going to release their “discoveries”.
Over TWO YEARS later, nothing. The Donald now refuses to talk about his “investigators”. We all know why.
Trump, Arpaio and Zullo have proven — again and again — that they cannot be trusted. They simply have no concept of honest service. None at all.