OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Press Release: Update on Judge Lamberth cases

Posted on | October 9, 2013 | 21 Comments

Press release from Dr. Orly Taitz

1. Taitz v Donahoe

Obama’s use of a fabricated selective service registration with a fabricated cancellation postal stamp affixed to it.

Today I received a call from number 202-752-2506. The person identified himself as Daniel Van Horn, Chief of Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. He stated that he got a call from the court in regards to my case Taitz v Donahue and my motion for summary judgment. From what I understand the court gave them heads up that the defense did not respond and they need to file a response. (the court would not give heads up to U.S. citizens).   He stated that they confirmed that the complaint was received in the mail room of the Department of Justice, but it somehow disappeared. He stated that there is no question that I served them properly, but the papers disappeared in the mail room. He is planning to respond to Judge Lamberth and seek a delay and a stay of the case due to the shutdown of the government. He said that even after the shutdown he will ask for extension of time due to backlog. He wanted to know if I will consent to the delay. I told him that it is like with the debt ceiling stalemate: where Obama wants a trillion dollars credit card from Congress and the Congress asks, what will they get in return. I wanted to know what will I get in return? I stated that my only consideration is resolving the matter on the merits. I am doing this pro bono, as I grew up in the communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union, where the country was governed by a complete lawlessness. I want to make sure this is not happening, we cannot have a person sitting in the White House with a fabricated Selective Service registration with a fabricated cancellation USPS stamp affixed to it. I asked for a meeting with him an his clients: Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe   and Inspector General of the USPS David Williams in order to get an agreement to resolve this on the merits.  Mr. Van Horn stated that he does not think they will agree to it and he cannot do it. I asked if he would stipulate to a mutual request to Judge Lamberth to order such meeting with a mediator or an arbitrator. He said he cannot do it, but will provide Judge Lamberth with this request.

Further, I asked if he can forward a copy of the complaint to the criminal division of the Department of Justice, he said that the Chair of the Criminal Division is Mary McCord, they do have more people there during the shut down, but he does not think it will help, he does not think they will do anything.

He stated that he understands the situation and he knows that my intentions are honorable and he believes that it will be ultimately decided on the merits, but at the moment he only can write to the judge and ask for a stay due to the shut down.

2. Taitz v Astrue Motion for reconsideration was filed based on rule 60B 2. 6.

Today I got an order from Judge Lamberth, where he ruled on a completely different statute: 60 c. He said that statute 60 C has only 1 year time limitation, however I filed my motion based on 60 B 2, 6, which does not have any time limitation as long as it serves justice. I will post the motion yet again. So I will be filing yet another motion to Lamberth, letting him know that he ruled based on a wrong statute and he needs to reconsider and rule based on a correct statute. Also, he denied a motion for default without any consideration and reason and allowed the Department of Justice to file a late response.

I am also really angry, as we can see an impermissible bias in court: the court gives the government additional time, the court is calling the attorneys for the defense, even though it is an impermissible ex parte communication between the court and a party in the case, while keeping the other party in the dark in regards to such communication. Time and again judges dismiss cases against Obama due to time limitation, however when the defense does not respond, judges allow them to file late papers, rule on wrong statutes, anything and everything to cover up this crime of the century. He also did not grant the motion for judicial notice, stating that the Census papers for Bounel were not certified, however governmental agencies routinely refuse any and all requests for certification, particularly of documents, which represent inconvenient truth. Feds never denied that the Census papers were correct, so this is yet another excuse.

Bottom line, the courts treat U.S. citizens trying to get Justice and prosecute criminals in power, as second class citizens. This should not be happening.

Now I am in my dental office. When Van Horn called I was literally pulling teeth. I will review the paper in the evening and will file an answer. No ruling yet  in MD on the case filed directly based on Bounel’s IDs. No ruling yet in other cases.

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ


Comments

21 Responses to “Press Release: Update on Judge Lamberth cases”

  1. Bud
    October 9th, 2013 @ 2:30 pm
  2. Donna
    October 9th, 2013 @ 2:32 pm

    Orly, I’ve said it over and over again—NO JUDGE WILL TOUCH obama for ANY reason–THIS pRESIDENCY was adonedeal in 1961!!! He knew at 17 years old that he’d be pRESIDENT!!! IT was said in 1961 “ONE DAY HE WILL be pRESIDENT”!!! It took ALL of these years to make it happen! WHO MADE IT HAPPEN???

  3. bo pe
    October 9th, 2013 @ 2:45 pm

    SIMILAR COWARDLY RESPONSES.

    ENGLAND IN SACRAMENTO DID NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE..THE TRANSCRIPT SHOWED HE PRETENDED YOU WERE SAYING SOMETHING ELSE WHEN YOU STATE WHAT YOU STATED. AFTER YOU STATED WHAT YOU STATED HE GOES BACK AGAIN AND TALKS ABOUT SOMETHING YOU DIDNT STATE AND REFUSED TO ADDRESS WHAT YOU STATED.

    NOW THIS COWARD LAMBERTH. HE DOES THE SAME MO.

    OH IM SORRY. EXCUSES AFTER EXCUSES AFTER EXCUSES.

    WE ARE SUPPOSE TO BELIEVE THAT THIS JUDGE DOESNT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LETTERS B & C.

    PLEASE ANOTHER LIAR ON THE BENCH MAKING ME CLENCH.

    THIS PHONY FRAUD OF A JUSTITUTE KNOWS THE HELL THAT HE IS DEBASING AND DEFRAUDING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH HIS RULING.

    WHY IS THE JUSTICE DEPT SO INTERESTED IN THIS.

    THIS IS A DEAD MAN.

    THE FACT THE JUSTICE DEPT IS INVOLVED SPEAKS VOLUMES..THEY ARE CROOKED AND COMPLICIT IN THE RELEASE OF THE DOCUMENTS FOR A DEAD MAN 120 YEARS LATER.

    HE IS A DEAD MAN. ITS BEEN 120 YEARS.

    THE SKY IS BLUE. THE UNIVERSE IS EXPANDING.

    THEY ARE OUT OF THERE MINDS…

  4. bo pe
    October 9th, 2013 @ 2:49 pm

    THE ENTER GOT AWAY FROM ME..

    THEY ARE CROOKED AND COMPLICIT IN THE non RELEASE OF DOCUMENTS FOR A DEAD MAN 120 YEARS LATER.

    LAMBERTH 101 DAYS LATER AND THIS IS THE BS THAT YOU COME UP WITH..

    PLEASE…LAMBERTH IS PRETENDING HE MADE A MISTAKE..THE PIG IS NOT ONLY WEARING LIPSTICK IT NOW HAS CRAP ON ITS EYE AS EYESHADOW..

    DONT WE LOOK PRETTY NOW..

  5. bo pe
    October 9th, 2013 @ 2:52 pm

    NO DELAY…RULE ON THE DEFAULT NOW. THIS IS RIDICULOUS..

    ITS COMING FOLKS.. HOLD ON TO YOUR BRITCHES..

  6. Bud
    October 9th, 2013 @ 3:18 pm

    I hope the truckers and veterans don’t make a wrong turn and end up in front of the Judges palace. They would be in hot water!

  7. trryhs@AOL.com
    October 9th, 2013 @ 5:01 pm

    Donna is that crazies from tea party nation.
    Donna, where is that TV interview from 1961?
    You done’t have.
    Talk to my mom, she 77 , and a new hound like myself and she never hear such B.S.!
    And Donna, you’re right. No judge will judge this.
    But they will for a Canadian highborn President.

  8. js/js
    October 9th, 2013 @ 5:59 pm

    As predicted, Lamberth tries to deep “6” the case. Holder must have threatened him good.
    Send them both to GITMO, IMO.

    As for the DOJ and lost mail, utter treason.
    It is a FEDERAL crime to destroy the US Mail
    in a legal proceeding. The Mail Room needs
    total surveillance and some legal depositions.
    The crooks are crooks indeed– even at DOJ!!!!
    This cannot continue to go on.

    We feel bad. But Americans must go on!!!
    Keep up the good fight, Lady Liberty (Orly)!!!

  9. Richard
    October 9th, 2013 @ 6:27 pm

    Jesus said in the last days a great tribulation would happen transgressions (sins) and lawlessness will increase, the angels will gather all that offend and practice lawlessness and they will be thrown into the lake of fire. They can’t escape. Psalm 94 says the Lord see through their eyes and hears through their ears.

  10. Alexander Gofen
    October 9th, 2013 @ 10:19 pm

    Watching this grotesque ugliness of judicial sabotage in America which Dr. Orly Taitz almost solely confronts and exposes during the last 5 years, I was trying to find some historic analogy or a metaphor of what we see now. And I found it.

    A long caravan carrying tons of all kinds of Soviet-made “equipment” (from the mentality to state apparatus to judicial system) has landed in America and took it completely. That is why it looks as though Dr. Taitz kept filing a case after case in Soviet courts during Brezhnev time: All cases having merits, but … exposing the Soviet crimes. This can go on because the KGB (in this metaphor) happened to lag far behind somewhere in the tail of the caravan (*). Absent of the KGB for a while, the dissidents like Dr. Taitz took a full advantage of it, and overwhelmed the courts with the cases the courts have no idea how to “handle”. So the clerks and judges keep maneuvering, dodging, scribbling nonsense… They really do not know what to do, just waiting when the KGB finally arrives…

    And that is what this rotten stupid America is waiting for.

    —————–

    (*) Just a fiction. In the real life it would be vice versa indeed. The KGB would be first to land and occupy America. And this IS the reality in many respects.

  11. richard Toes
    October 9th, 2013 @ 11:19 pm

    I have nothing but admiration for all that you are attempting. Any other human would have given up this search for the truth long long ago.

  12. Thomas
    October 10th, 2013 @ 5:53 am

    I am sorry Mrs. Taitz, I called the Clerks office several times asking that Judge Lamberth make a Ruling on this Case. It is just a GAME to these BASTARDS ! Lieing to the American PEOPLE, That in itself SHOULD BE a Hanging Offence!!! Since 2008 I cannot remember all the Papers I’ve sent to Govt. Officials… And they have ALL BEEN IGNORED!
    Their is No REAL Representation of The PEOPLE Anymore. Their are NO Fair ELECTIONS Anymore.
    Their is NO JUSTICE For The American People Anymore… Just CHANGE… NO HOPE.
    The Tree of Liberty Needs Pruning, WITH the Blood of PATRIOTS and Tyrants!

  13. bill davis
    October 10th, 2013 @ 6:32 am

    Well I reckon the only excuse we haven’t seen yet
    is “His Honor made a ruling,but his dog ate it” 🙂

  14. Torrance
    October 10th, 2013 @ 6:44 am

    Dr. Taitz,

    As you know, approximately two weeks ago, I printed off that 172 page compilation and mailed it to Ted Cruz. I am pleased to say it hasn’t been mailed back to me for any weird reason, so he must have, in his possession, all of the meticulous documents you have filed, gathered, etc. I can only hope he uses your paperwork to bring impeachment charges upon Obama. Thank you for all you keep doing to expose that man for the fraud he is.

  15. Robert Benson
    October 10th, 2013 @ 7:15 am

    Ah, perhaps you should appeal, and let Judge Lambreth answer for having used the wrong letter. Clearly, judicial error. It seems malicious, too. Intentionally oblivious. I’d mention that in an appeal, too, Lady Liberty.

  16. Man 'O War
    October 10th, 2013 @ 9:45 am

    Sometimes, this insane fight is a waiting game!
    Dr Orly has done everything she can to put a stop to this.

    Now, let’s see what kind of activity our truckers and vets can create.

    First, the bikers, then, the truckers, and now, the vets are going to make an impact upon the Benedict Arnolds of D.C.!

  17. kw
    October 10th, 2013 @ 5:06 pm

    The point that is made by a constant refusal for justice and Constitutional governance, from one government body, agency and court after another, is ya gotta try another approach because what yer doing now is of no importance or consequence to Marxists, communists and tyrants. So, bring on the truckers, vets and bikers, and mix in a few million militia, too.

  18. Birdy
    October 10th, 2013 @ 6:12 pm

    America is gone.

  19. Thomas
    October 11th, 2013 @ 5:19 am

    Remember… THE BATTLE OF ATHENS !

  20. Elizabeth
    October 11th, 2013 @ 11:41 am

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5ut6yPrObw

    Wow! I had never heard of this confrontation before. 1946 was a good year for veterans to
    re-establish the rule of law. They were still in the fighting mode from winning WW2.

    2013 could be the same if they have the
    will to implement this action,
    as did our ancestors of 67 years ago.

  21. Wayne T Inman
    October 12th, 2013 @ 11:10 am

    We need to remove (and justice for all from the pledge of aleigence.

Leave a Reply