Press release: Pleadings by Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ in Texas v US were accepted by Judge Hanen, however they were reclassified not as an intervenor, but as Amicus Curiae, meaning friend of the court
Posted on | February 11, 2015 | 5 Comments
Press release: Pleadings by Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ in Texas v US were accepted by Judge Hanen, however they were reclassified not as an intervenor, but as Amicus Curiae, meaning friend of the court
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ filed a brief with Judge Hanen in Texas v US. The pleadings were accepted, but not as an intervenor, but as Amicus Curiae, friend of the court.
In the case Taitz v Obama, Johnson, Burwell there is no decision yet. Currently, Defend Our Freedoms foundation, which is run by Dr. Taitz has a $3,000 debt for filing fees and fees for the experts, transcripts and travel to court proceedings. Donations are greatly appreciated and can be given via paypal on www.OrlyTaitzESQ.com or by mail to 29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., § Plaintiffs, § § V. § CIVIL NO. B-14-254 § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., § Defendants. § ORDER The Motion to Intervene [Doc. No. 137] filed by Dr. Orly Taitz is hereby denied without prejudice. The Court finds that Rule 24(a)(1) is not applicable. The Court also finds that Rule 24(a)(2) is not applicable. Nevertheless, even if Rule 24(a)(2) were applicable based upon how the outcome of this suit might affect these individuals, the Court finds that her interests are adequately represented by the Plaintiff States. Further, the Court finds Rules 24(b)(1) and (2) to also be inapplicable. Finally, pursuant to Rule 24(b)(3), the Court finds this matter to be time sensitive and the addition of new parties will cause undue delay and prejudice. Nevertheless, the pleadings filed by putative intervenor, Dr. Orly Taitz, will be reviewed as if she were amicus curiae. “Where he presents no new questions, a third party can contribute usually most effectively and always most expeditiously by a brief amicus curiae and not by intervention.” See Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350, 359 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam). Signed this 11th day of February, 2015. ________________________________ Andrew S. Hanen United States District Judge
Comments
5 Responses to “Press release: Pleadings by Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ in Texas v US were accepted by Judge Hanen, however they were reclassified not as an intervenor, but as Amicus Curiae, meaning friend of the court”
Leave a Reply
February 11th, 2015 @ 8:30 pm
being classified as a friend of the court is not gonna make Obama’s rich powerful backers happy-
February 11th, 2015 @ 9:45 pm
This site needs a “like” button, especially for this post. Sounds like you’re getting closer with this case.
February 12th, 2015 @ 3:44 am
This is very good news. That means that you will be able to argue in front of the court at the next hearing. If anything, it’s a win win for the plaintiffs. I hope they remember to thank you for this.
February 12th, 2015 @ 7:41 am
Slow and steady wins the race, especially when God is on our side.
YOU have been the pioneer for truth! YOU were the first to post the fact the impostor never signed an executive order, but only an executive action delaying deportation of illegals .. a clearly unlawful act. So many others jumped on your bandwagon and ran with it, claiming they were the first.
Thank you doesn’t suffice Orly. America and her LEGAL American citizens will be forever indebted to you.
February 12th, 2015 @ 12:26 pm
Great job, Orly.
Remember the race between the tortoise and the hare…
slowly we go, inch by inch…this way, nothing is left unturned, to hit ’em with impact!
You are thee Patriot, Dr Orly!