OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


US has done a record 10,313,747 tests. Positivity went down from 20% to 13.9%

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

US has done a record 10,313,747 tests. Positivity went down from 20% to 13.9%

Former prosecutor and congressman Trey Gowdy: 10 years in prison is a punishment for leaking secret intelligence info to reporters, he is also shocked about Sullivan’s actions in Flynn’s case

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Gowdy appeared on FOX today stating that there does not appear to be any legitimate reason for so many Obama officials to unmask Flynn, particularly so close to inauguration. He stated that unmasking and leaking intelligence  info to reporters is punishable by 10 years in prison. He also stated that he never saw in his years as a prosecutor what Judge Sullivan is doing in Flynn’s case. Just a couple of days ago John Gleeson wrote an article that shows Gleeson to be extremely biased against Flynn and DOJ and Sullivan is allowing this biased person to just come in and argue. Gleeson has no standing and no place to be in this case at all. Sullivan is supposed to be an unbiased and impartial arbitrator between two parties in this case. Two parties want the case dismissed. The only thing Sullivan needs to do, is sign the papers and dismiss it. Sullivan’s actions in bringing an extremely biased person who has nothing to do with the case, shows an impermissible bias and abuse of power by Sullivan

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Top Biden Staffer Attacks CBS Reporter for Flynn Bombshell

Deleted, No Explanation… Still Sharing Question of Why She Has Her Job!

Campaign Promise Broken: ‘no bullying of the media from the podium or by tweet’

President Barack Obama, left, standing with Vice President Joe Biden, right, listen as Diana Calderon, a student who has benefited from the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, speaks at a reception in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 15, 2015, for Hispanic Heritage …

A top Joe Biden aide lashed out a CBS News correspondent for reporting on the release of a new memo indicating the former vice president was aware of the “unmasking” of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.

Senator Graham appeared on TV today stating that he never saw a judge do what Emmet Sullivan is doing in Flynn case

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

ID to Eat But Not to Vote: Washington Restaurants Ordered to Keep Log of All Customers, Including Contact Information

A total of 22.8 million Americans are getting unemployment insurance

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Last week 2.9 million filed new unemployment claims. However a number went back to work. Currently, a total of 22,8 million are getting unemployment

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | 1 Comment

IT’S ON! President Trump Calls for Former President Obama to be Questioned Under Oath on SpyGate!!

Clear example of polls being bogus. Cook report and Uni of VA Center for politics (Larry Sabato) saw Garcia/ Smith match up as a tossup. Garcia won with a huge 12% margin

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

This district voted for a Democrat, Katie Hill,  in 2018 by a 9% margin. Now it voted for a Republican with a 12% margin. This is a 21% swing towards a Republican in a 2 year span.

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Goldman Sachs says a second wave of coronavirus could make the Fed rethink negative interest rates

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Restaurants in some California counties to reopen under restrictions

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Based on the Fokker precedent, Judge Sullivan has no legal right to refuse to dismiss the case when the prosecution wants to dismiss the case

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | 2 Comments

Under the Fokker Case that just came out 2 years ago, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government wants to dismiss a case you cannot, the District Court cannot refuse to do so because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Because he thinks the government should continue the case.  And it doesn’t matter if the defendant has pled or not.

DC Circuit’s prior decision on Fokker case PROHIBITS Judge Sullivan to refuse to dismiss the case after prosecution stated that they want to dismiss.

I believe there will be a writ of mandate to the DC circuit. It is absolutely shocking, the level of bias against Flynn in unprecedented. Judge Sullivan read an article about Flynn’s case by  Gleason. Gleason is clearly biased against Flynn. Gleason has zero standing to be in the case at all, to argue anything at all, and Sullivan bringing him in the case shows an unprecedented level of bias against the defendant by a judge. This is the same judge who previously baselessly accused Flyn of treason, but later retracted his statement after an outcry.

Since the Arthur Andersen prosecution in which thousands of innocent workers lost their jobs, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has increasingly turned to deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to avoid the collateral consequences of a corporate criminal conviction.1.SeeBrandon L. Garrett, Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations 41, 44, 55 (2014). In a DPA, the government agrees to dismiss filed charges if a corporation complies with negotiated conditions that are aimed at punishing the misconduct and allowing the corporation to demonstrate rehabilitation. Traditionally, judicial scrutiny over the DPA’s terms has been “essentially nonexistent.”2. Mike Koehler, Measuring the Impact of Non-Prosecution and Deferred Prosecution Agreements on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement, 49 UC Davis L. Rev. 497, 505 (2015) (citing U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GAO-10-110, Corporate Crime 8, 25 (2009)); see also U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, supra, at 25 (reporting, based on a survey of twelve U.S. district and magistrate judges who handled cases involving a DPA, that judges “were generally not involved in the DPA process”). However, three recent district court decisions have attempted to assert a more substantive role for the court — declaring that an Article III judge is not a “potted plant”3. United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 12-CR-763, 2013 WL 3306161, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. July 1, 2013); see also United States v. Saena Tech Corp., 140 F. Supp. 3d 11, 33 (D.D.C. 2015) (quoting HSBC Bank, 2013 WL 3306161, at *5). or “rubber stamp”4. United States v. Fokker Servs. B.V., 79 F. Supp. 3d 160, 164 (D.D.C. 2015). when reviewing DPAs. The D.C. Circuit subsequently curtailed these efforts in United States v. Fokker Services B.V.,5. 818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016). in which it held that to preserve “the Executive’s long-settled primacy over charging,”6.Id. at 743. a court is not authorized to reject a DPA based on a finding that the “charging decisions” and “conditions agreed to in the DPA” are inadequate.7.Id. at 747. By ostensibly precluding judicial review of a DPA’s negotiated terms, the D.C. Circuit overcorrected and reinforced the executive branch’s unchecked discretion over DPAs by reassuring prosecutors that future courts will rubber stamp such agreements.

The Harvard article continues noting the Judge in the Fokker case stated that:

…as a matter of established law, the judiciary is not to second-guess the Executive’s decisions of “whether to initiate charges, whom to prosecute, which charges to bring, and whether to dismiss charges.” 

Sol Weisenberg discussed this matter on Laura Ingraham show. Weisenberg is the former Whitewater prosecutor.

Based on the Fokker precedent Judge Sullivan has no legal right to refuse to dismiss the case when the prosecution wants to dismiss the case

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

Under the Fokker Case that just came out 2 years ago, the DC Circuit which governs Judge Sullivan made it very clear if the government wants to dismiss a case you cannot, the District Court cannot refuse to do so because he doesn’t like the government’s theory. Because he thinks the government should continue the case.  And it doesn’t matter if the defendant has pled or not.

DC Circuit’s prior decision on Fokker case PROHIBITS Judge Sullivan to refuse to dismiss the case after prosecution stated that they want to dismiss.

I believe there will be a writ of mandate to the DC circuit. It is absolutely shocking, the level of bias against Flynn in unprecedented. Judge Sullivan read an article about Flynn’s case by  Gleason. Gleason is clearly biased against Flynn. Gleason has zero standing to be in the case at all, to argue anything at all, and Sullivan bringing him in the case shows an unprecedented level of bias against the defendant by a judge. This is the same judge who previously baselessly accused Flyn of treason, but later retracted his statement after an outcry.    

Attorney Sol Wisenberg Drops a Bomb on Judge Sullivan’s Corrupt Actions: “If the Government Wants to Dismiss a Case – The District Court Cannot Refuse to Do So!”

FOX leads among cable news networks, however combined numbers of the networks on the left are pretty much the same as FOX on the right. The nation seems to be evenly divided

Posted on | May 14, 2020 | No Comments

CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. MAY 12 2020

FOXNEWS HANNITY 4,481,000
FOXNEWS TUCKER 4,368,000
FOXNEWS FIVE 4,017,000
FOXNEWS LAURA 3,718,000
MSNBC MADDOW 3,466,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 3,240,000
MSNBC O’DONNELL 2,526,000
MSNBC HAYES 2,027,000
CNN CUOMO 1,832,000
CNN TAPPER 1,577,000
CNN COOPER 1,510,000

« go back — keep looking »