Now the left calls me the mouthpiece for Lamar Smith and “Numbers USA”. This interview was done by a far left reporter and, as she admits in her e-mail, was changed.
Posted on | September 24, 2011 | 12 Comments
As you can see by the e-mail below, this interview was changed and manipulated. In her e-mail the reporter warns me, that the interview might not be what I remembered it to be. She inserted parts and she removed parts. For example, I do not recall her mentioning in the interview Alberto Gonzales and Dick Cheney. On the other hand I vividly remember, that when she stated that we are torturing innocent Muslims, I asked her if those are the innocent Muslims, who mastermind the slaughter of 3,000 Americans on 9/11, Pan-am 103 and USS Cole. This was not in the final version of the interview.
She calls me a mouthpiece for Lamar Smith (Chair of the House Committee on the Judiciary), which might be seen as an Honor by many, and it is an Honor for me, while it is definitely a problem for this far left reporter, Sheila Dean . She also calls me a mouthpiece for “Numbers USA”, which is a legitimate organization dealing with illegal immigration, but which is obviously a problem for Sheila Dean.
I am often asked, why do I even bother giving interviews to these reporters, who twist every word I say. The answer is simple: these interviews are heard by some on the left or independents, who might think for themselves, who will hear what I have to say and might start thinking: “Maybe this woman is right. Why do we have a president with a Social Security number from the state, where he never resided? Why doesn’t he have a number from HI? Why shouldn’t American citizens get an answer?’ It is hard to listen to Interviews, which are manipulated so much. Sometimes I am ready to scream, but the truth and Justice have to prevail. Somebody has to carry this cross…
Comments
12 Responses to “Now the left calls me the mouthpiece for Lamar Smith and “Numbers USA”. This interview was done by a far left reporter and, as she admits in her e-mail, was changed.”
Leave a Reply
September 24th, 2011 @ 10:34 pm
The voice of truthful proclamation will always stand. Voices of against it stand out as highlighters to the very exposure of your efforts. Liars will cover for the liar-in-chief barry soetero. That is their job regardless of the facts.
Slapisnky’s (rules from radicals) are null and void when brave, righteous, and truthful citizens stand for righteousness. The stamina, sacrifice, and diligence that Orly demonstrates 24/7 will win. Small setbacks are only attempts of the evil perpetrators to stall the inevitable-barry soetero is going down. Fraud never stands. Why? Foundations built on sand always wash away. Substance, that is truthful, crushes lies and forms solid ground to build on.
September 24th, 2011 @ 11:21 pm
Good interview, Orly. You are getting the information out very well to the ones on the left and the right. We can only hope that there are some on both sides with an open mind, and can figure it out that there is a felon in OUR White House, that needs to be removed, arraigned, hopefully NO BOND as he would be a flight risk, tried, and sent to prison to rot. I don’t want him deported, as he would be put in power by cousin Odinga in Kenya, and who knows where Obama would go with that.
September 24th, 2011 @ 11:40 pm
Standard Operating Procedure by the shameless and dishonest Left.
September 25th, 2011 @ 6:06 am
I listened to the interview and cannot discern where your words were edited. Could you be more specific about what was altered?
September 25th, 2011 @ 6:48 am
The person who did the interview is a Libertarian. Damn liberals. They are, even infiltrating the Right.
September 25th, 2011 @ 7:16 am
Frankly, Orly, I’d consider it a complement to be called the mouthpiece for truth…especially by the left! 🙂
September 25th, 2011 @ 7:18 am
particularly to be considered a mouthpiece for the chair of the House committee on the judiciary
September 25th, 2011 @ 7:23 am
in the interview she did not mention Gonzales or Cheney, I would’ve remembered that. this part was included later. A lot of what I said was cut out. Her beginning and end were added later. when she contacted me, I understood, that she wanted to talk about my cases. She later prepared a piece, which was on a completely different subject, privacy and supposed big brother attack via e-verify
You can contact her and ask for the tape of the actual interview, you will see the difference
September 25th, 2011 @ 9:58 am
She also failed to mention George Clooney, and Morgan Freeman. You call her a journalist? Sheesh!
September 25th, 2011 @ 5:50 pm
It was an amusing interview to say the least. You did excellent in presenting your points and
Sheila did good acting like the female version of Alex Jones. I wonder how Sheila feels about Obamacare going to pry into personal Medical Records.
September 25th, 2011 @ 7:55 pm
I am not expert on 9/11 or the USS Cole, but I have an abiding interest in Pan Am 103, which was carried out by the US and Iran working together to give Iran its one and one only revenge for the deliberate shooting down of IR655, the Iranian Airbus. The PA103 revenge was carried out by the CIA and Iran’s Pasdaran working together in a plot devised by the CIA. The object of the IR655 plot was to kill a Mr Ahmad Beladi Behbehani, inferably the Iranian gofer in Iran-Contra, and create the conditions for a khaki election to get the pracrically unelectable HW Bush into the White House. This is provable unlike the shoddy rubbish served up by the Lockerbie Investigation which put Mr Magrahi into a Scottish slammer.
September 26th, 2011 @ 2:15 am
As sleep-deprived as you must be at this point, Orly, I’m not sure how dependable your memory is.