14 Responses to “New York Times comments on my questions to Newt Gingrich”

1. James Spaith
   February 15th, 2012 @ 4:41 am

   did you read the article Orly? truly you are from the school of “bad publicity is still publicity”. I can’t WAIT until Sheriff Joe releases his SHOCKING report, which will consist of the following statements: a) Obama is a natural-born citizen because he was born in Hawaii, and b) Orly Taitz should be disbarred.

   Have a good day.

2. RacerJim
   February 15th, 2012 @ 7:04 am

   @James Spaith

   Have you read Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution? Truely you are from the school of “citizen” is the same as “natural born Citizen”. I can’t WAIT until some controlling legal authority declares the following: a) Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah cannot be a “natural born Citizen” because the person he claims as his father NEVER was a citizen, and therefore; b) Obama is arrested, tried, convicted and executed for Treason, Bribery and other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

3. Thomas/PatriotofPast
   February 15th, 2012 @ 7:15 am

   Mr. Spaith, ANYONE attempting to fight for my constitution is a Hero in my book. Orly Taitz sees’ the 3 Dollar Bill residing in The Peoples House… She has lived under Communism and she sees’ the same (maybe worse) taking place here in America. Nobody knows what Sheriff Arpio will say, God willing it will Champion the U.S. Constitution, and our Founding Fathers wishes for us.

4. garth
   February 15th, 2012 @ 7:49 am

   In California we have song lyrics for everything. When there is a set back we hear some cheering, of, “Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha-Wipeout!” But the truth is, “And The Beat Goes On!” Orly, keep after them and him. We are all with you in this cause.

5. steve
   February 15th, 2012 @ 8:01 am

   spaith? What the hell is that?
   Which book did you steal that from?
   If you’re truly sincere but just stupid,
   why don’t you check facts before you speak.
   Obama or whoever his usurping ass is WILL
   be exposed for the treasonous criminal he is!
   I CAN wait.

6. steve
   February 15th, 2012 @ 8:08 am

   btw, Spaith or Spitoon or whoever you are,
   Sheriff Joe is NOT your friend.
   Believe me, you’re a tad confused.
   If anything I think he’s got something for u-
   why don’t you drop by and surprise him!

7. James Durwood Johnson
   February 15th, 2012 @ 8:38 am

   James Spaith,

   Take Obama’s BC that he had posted on the Internet on April 27, 2011 to your most trusted print analysis expert and see what he thinks of that cheap forgery made-up from many different documents. Maybe Obama has you fooled, but I don’t think he many print analysis experts fooled. Oh bye the way I can’t wait to read what you say your print analysis expert says. Have him create a document so you can share his opinion with all the reader on this web-site.

   See if you get your findings posted before Sheriff Joe’s findings are posted.

8. Bill Carroll
   February 15th, 2012 @ 11:00 am

   Zero of the states followed the vetting procedures. There was not lawful documents presented to the elector college to cast the votes on a state by state bases and the conformation in the senate chambers of the 535 electoral votes was never questioned, thank you Dick Cheney. The whole political institution in both parties have committed fraud and mostly by Dr. Taitz’s due diligence this is being exposed. Dr. Taitz… you have my most great graditude of respect in taking your duties as a citizen and attorney at law in supporting America’s state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution seriously.

9. Daddy Beerest
   February 15th, 2012 @ 11:59 am

   James Johnson,
   That’s the biggest problem that has you FOOLED. You cannot ask any reputable “print analysis expert” to give a forgery analysis based on pdf scanned copy of an original document. Any expert would not stake their reputation in the court of law based on something they cannot professionally analyze. Ever wonder why WND expert Mara Zebest blew off Orly?

   The same challenge should apply to you, or Orly , or WND. Submit the pdf copy of Obama’s BC to a professional organization like AFDE (Association of Forensic Document Examiners) and see what they say.

10. James Durwood Johnson
    February 15th, 2012 @ 6:24 pm

    Daddy Beerest,

    You are WRONG, many “print analysis expert” have already gone on the record orally, in writing, and testifying in court that the BC that Obama had posted on the Internet and displayed on TV on April 27, 2011, is nothing but a very cheap, poor forgery made-up from many different documents. I haven’t heard that any of those experts have had their reputations ruined. Daddy Beerest how do you explain the kerning of letters, the BC number being out of sequence with the other BC issued around the same time from the same hospital, and having a different Registrar’s name on it than the other BC have issued at the same time, from the same hospital. Daddy Beerest how do you explain all the above away? If I’m wrong I want to know so.

11. James Durwood Johnson
    February 15th, 2012 @ 7:05 pm

    An After Thought, for Daddy Beerest,

    You are probably right, I don’t know what the AFDE (Association of Forensic Document Examiners) would tell me. But that’s not surprising, that they might refuse to give a definitive finding on Obama’s BC. So far there have been a lots of judges, courts, and media scared to death to take on an Obama eligibility issue. Courts have been hiding behind a phony “NO STANDING” ruling. All American Citizens should have standing in this issue. Doesn’t Obama work for us? I think it’s our tax money that pays his salary.

12. Blabby1
    February 15th, 2012 @ 7:20 pm

    @James Durwood Johnson

    Good questions, but the answers need to come from professionals who enter the picture without an agenda. That is why someone certified by the Association of Forensic Document Examiners is considered the only “expert” qualified in Courts in the Western world to answer your questions and to pass judgment and then on the certified document itself — not the image on the internet. Several of them have weighed in, by the way. You need to search on the Net through their organization to see what they say.

13. James Durwood Johnson
    February 17th, 2012 @ 9:47 am

    To Babby1,

    Aren’t any of Orly Taitz, Esq. print analysis expert certified by the (AFDE)?. I have no idea. To me that seemed to be bit too restrictive and limited that a legal judgement could only come from organization. What if Obama had influence in some hidden way over that organization? That equivalent to saying only a licensed mechanic, from a certain licensing organization could testify in court that a person actually had a flat tire on their car. Sorry for the nit picking. Babby1, some of what I listed as wrong on Obama’s BC has nothing to do with the type of print, it had to do with the DATA, and the (AFDE) is certainly not a qualifies experts in that area. Babby1, I’m not sure but I really believe you and I are on the same side on this Obama Eligibility issue. Anyway I hope so.

14. alex
    February 19th, 2012 @ 5:51 pm

    OBAMA FAILED THE US HOMELAND SECURITY BACKROUND CHECK –THEY SAID OBAMAS SOC SEC 042-68-4425 IS A FAKE—PROOF OBAMA IS ILLEGAL—(GOOGLE LINDA JORDAN) FOR HER STORY OF ENTERING OBAMA INTO HOMELAND SEC CHECKER AND OBAMA FAILING IT.

Leave a Reply