8 Responses to “National sovereignty will be completely destroyed if one president can orchestrate an invasion of 12 million illegals and the next president is told that he has to have a court hearing in order to deport each one of them, which will take decades. During these decades the next Democrat will allow another 12 million illegals or 112 million to invade the US. My question is, why didn’t federal judges seek an injunction against Biden and order him to keep all the illegals in the third country or border facilities until their bogus asylum claims are processed? Just as Trump instituted a successful “stay in Mexico” policy for new illegals, Trump should sign an executive order for deported illegals to wait for their deportation appeals results in the third country, likely Mexico. Senate GOP can and should vote with simple majority to end the filibuster for deportation and national security matters and codify such executive order”

1. Paul Antonov
   March 22nd, 2025 @ 1:13 pm

   What the next Democratic President will do is apply the same extortion to Republican universities and law firms – implement my ideology or be financially destroyed.

2. KenArmstrong
   March 22nd, 2025 @ 5:47 pm

   People should look up who is a member of the American inns of Court. This is a SECRET group of judges, having secret meetings. The president of the club is Boasberg. Also includes Beryl Howell. Apparently Roberts is also involved.

   Bottom line is who is in charge, the President or the judiciary.There should not be any secret courts in a free society.

3. George Callahan
   March 23rd, 2025 @ 7:47 am

   How can federal judges seek an order against the President? And even if they could, the Trump assertion is that the President is not answerable to the judiciary.

4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 23rd, 2025 @ 8:28 am

   That is exactly what Dems did to Facebook, Twitter and thousands of other companies and businesses, demanding that they implement and follow all of their idiotic far left and globalist policies and be destroyed

5. taino21
   March 23rd, 2025 @ 9:41 am

   Paul Antonov, sounds like a name fitting for a KGB agent. Under what rock have you been living for the past, at least 25 years? What you accuse Republicans of doing your democrat friends have been doing since FDR! Either you have not paid attention to current events or you know nothing of American History! Does separation of powers mean anything to you? Never mind that when it comes to immigration Judges don’t have a say do unless there is some form of human rights violations.
   Maybe you need to do some research on American History.
   The Fifth Congress committed to the President these powers:
   “Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies. The President is authorized, in any such event, by his proclamation thereof, or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed, on the part of the United States, toward the aliens who become so liable; the manner and degree of the restraint to which they shall be subject
   Page 335 U. S. 162

   Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
   https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/335/160/

   Held
   Held:

   1. The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166.

   2. In the circumstances of relations between the United States and Germany, there exists a “declared war” notwithstanding the cessation of actual hostilities, and the order is enforceable. Pp. 335 U. S. 166-170.

   3. The Alien Enemy Act, construed as permitting resort to the courts only to challenge its validity and construction, and to raise questions of the existence of a “declared war” and of alien enemy status, does not violate the Bill of lights of the Federal Constitution. Pp. 335 U. S. 170-171.

   4. The fact that hearings are utilized by the Executive to secure an informed basis for the exercise of the summary power conferred by the Act does not empower the courts to retry such hearings, nor does it make the withholding of such power from the courts a denial of due process. Pp. 335 U. S. 171-172.

   163 F.2d 143 affirmed.

   Petitioner, in custody under an order of the Attorney General for his removal from the United States under the Alien Enemy Act, applied to the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus for release from detention under the order(Page 335 U. S. 161). The District Court’s denial of the writ was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 163 F.2d 143. This Court granted certiorari. 333 U.S. 865. Affirmed, p. 335 U. S. 173.

   Now, what part of, 1. The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order. Pp. 335 U. S. 163-166., do this judge don’t understand?

6. Paul Antonov
   March 23rd, 2025 @ 9:55 am

   It’s totally different. Facebook and Twitter are doing ok, though Twitter is losing users and advertisers because of Musk. But a President can sanction law firms because members of the firm sue him? Except for Alito, who never rules against Trump, he will lose 8-1 at SCOTUS

7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 24th, 2025 @ 11:51 pm

   Actually X went up in valuation. While originally Fidelity valued it at $9.4 billion and Musk was derided for overpaying, now it is valued at $44 billion. Though Musk bought it to help the country and humanity, not for money, it went up anyway. Regarding SCOTUS, we’ll see

8. orly taitz
   April 10th, 2025 @ 3:06 pm

   great research

Leave a Reply