My interview given to Sharon Rondeau, editor of “The Post and e-mail”
Posted on | October 22, 2011 | 9 Comments
Category: Obama Fraud Gate, Orly Taitz 9th circuit, orly taitz attorney, Orly Taitz civil rights leader, Orly Taitz doctor and attorney, Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012, Orly Taitz Hawaii, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate, Orly Taitz Obama social Security number, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Orly Taitz subpoena, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Radio and Media Broadcasts, Supporting Documentation
Comments
9 Responses to “My interview given to Sharon Rondeau, editor of “The Post and e-mail””
Leave a Reply
October 22nd, 2011 @ 12:01 pm
The Post Email is one of the most journalistically honest websites in America! Kudos for having an interview on Ms Rondeau’s site. She is also an accomplished musician.
October 22nd, 2011 @ 2:35 pm
The Post & Email exhaustively researches every story for accuracy before publication. Its editorials are scrutinized for fairness like no other newspaper, and its fR-flung correspondents are legendary. It should win a Pulitzer Prize for it’s Commodore Walter FitzPatRick exposes. You should consider yourself to be lucky to be interviewed by the “paper of record.”
October 22nd, 2011 @ 6:37 pm
LOL. Kinescat has made a funny.
October 22nd, 2011 @ 10:20 pm
The Post and Email puts the New York Times to shame any day of the week.
October 22nd, 2011 @ 10:31 pm
Kinescat,
I challenge you to find one inaccuracy that the Post and Email reported in this story. I’ll be waitimg……. I predict crickets.
October 23rd, 2011 @ 6:32 am
“The Truth” (great screen name), most everything in this paragraph is wrong:
“As an attorney, Taitz had issued a subpoena to Fuddy to produce the document last summer, followed up by a subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court in Honolulu. On the deadline date of August 8, 2011, surrogates for Fuddy presented a letter to Taitz stating that Obama’s original record could not be disclosed due to privacy concerns.”
October 23rd, 2011 @ 12:56 pm
Concerned,
I asked Kinescat to reply because I doubt they have the mental capacity to do so on an accuracy basis.
But since you have answered for Kinescat, can you please explain the inaccuracies you write about?
October 23rd, 2011 @ 1:32 pm
What are the inaccuracies in that, Concerned? I see that at The Fogbow they’ve printed that response plus your next one, but Lady Liberty has decided not to print your next one which shows all the inaccuracies.
Lennie – if you want to see the inaccuracies, go to The Fogbow.
I predict locusts.
October 23rd, 2011 @ 6:03 pm
Did kinescat reply? If so, please post it, Orly.