OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

My case will be heard by all 9 Justices of the Supreme Court. Whether they will actually read a word, or it will be decided by the same clerks, remains to be seen. There were no signatures of any Justices in Lightfoot v Bowen and no signature on prior “denial” by Thomas

Posted on | August 12, 2010 | 15 Comments

  U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito refers Orly Taitz issue to entire court  
  Columbus Ledger-Enquirer  August 11, 2010
By Alan Riquelmy, Columbus Ledger-Enquirer, Ga.

Aug. 11–U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has referred to the entire court a request from “birther” attorney Orly Taitz to have her $20,000 in sanctions dismissed.

U.S. District Court Judge Clay Land imposed the sanctions last year after he warned her and then gave her a time limit to explain why he shouldn’t fine her in the September 2009 case of Capt. Connie Rhodes, who questioned the legitimacy of President Barack Obama.

Taitz appealed the sanctions to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. That court upheld the sanctions in May, and Taitz sent an application for stay to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on July 8. Thomas denied it a week later.

Taitzthen refiled it with Alito on Aug. 4, who on Tuesday referred it to the entire nine-member court, the Supreme Court’s website states.

“He circulated it to the other eight justices and said, ‘Does anybody else want to do something with this?'” Columbus attorney William Mason said.

Mason previously has said that Taitz should have filed a writ of certiorari instead of the application for stay, arguing that an application for stay is only done in extraordinary circumstances once a case has been appealed properly by filing a writ.

Taitzhas said that one doesn’t exclude the other, and on Tuesday declined to say whether she will file a writ with the high court.

On Monday, a lien was filed on all of Taitz’s real property. Taitz said she wouldn’t give the government the satisfaction of taking her property or potentially her law license, adding she would pay the fine.

As of today, Taitz said on her website that she had raised $1,740 in donations.

—–
Category: Latest News, Legal Actions

Comments

15 Responses to “My case will be heard by all 9 Justices of the Supreme Court. Whether they will actually read a word, or it will be decided by the same clerks, remains to be seen. There were no signatures of any Justices in Lightfoot v Bowen and no signature on prior “denial” by Thomas”

  1. Chito
    August 12th, 2010 @ 4:13 am

    We pray majority of the 9 justices will finally hear your case, for the sake of the country. May God have mercy on this country.

  2. Veritas
    August 12th, 2010 @ 5:40 am

    already reading threads on this on GRETA WIRE:

    1.) BREAKING (Orly): ALITO refers TAITZ case to ENTIRE COURT

    2.) WILL KAGAN recuse Herself in UPCOMING ELIGIBILITY Scotus CASE?

  3. Rick
    August 12th, 2010 @ 5:55 am

    Congratulations Orly!

    Keep up the good fight!

  4. Jack Hoff
    August 12th, 2010 @ 5:57 am

    Hi Dr. Taitz – I just wanted to comment on your appeal to the 9th circuit there in California. One of our paralegals downloaded it this morning from Pacer and I have to just write that it is an absolutely brilliant master piece! I certainly wish we had someone in our office that could write briefs such as this.

    But my primary reason for leaving this comment is the section that describes how Obama was sworn in by Chief Justice Roberts. I watched that day – the 20th – and I’ll have to say that I think you’re on to something here. From my perspective, I was looking closely at both of their faces during the swearing in and it looked like both were under a great deal of duress. Is it possible that they knew that you had already filed your lawsuit before that time? Is it possible that this is the worst case of fraud to be perpetrated on the American People? This is truly a travesty!!!

    Jack

  5. Rick
    August 12th, 2010 @ 5:58 am

    Does this mean SCOTUS will look solely at your sanction… or, will they look into the merits of Capt. Rhodes case?

  6. CELinck
    August 12th, 2010 @ 7:01 am

    Lady Liberty – I understand you have filed your brief in Barnett. Can you please post your brief so that we may all see how you have — brilliantly I am sure — handled all the issues in that complicated case?

    Also, I am mailing you a check today for $500 to help pay the sanctions. I am looking forward to a complete reversal by the Supreme Court soon. Are you going to seek to disqualify Justice Kagan?

  7. Sonia Dregne
    August 12th, 2010 @ 9:36 am

    I believe in my heart of hearts, the supreme court is in bed with the administraton along with the lower courts. I am beginning to hate this country and the american people are doing to it.

  8. Suzanne Short
    August 12th, 2010 @ 10:31 am

    Orly, did you ever think of or have you done so, filed charges with the FBI. Since they are our chief law enforcement agency, it might be possible that this would be a way to go. A group of us are submitting charges with them next week. Another person involved is keep tabs on the signatures that we have required so far in acknowledging that they approve of the charges being filed against Obama. According to the FBI, the more signatures one has on a document such as this the better the chance of action being taken from the FBI.
    If you would like to contact the person handling the document being submitted contact me by e-mail I listed it above. God be with you. I will be praying for your success. “In God We Trust.”

  9. Leonard McCauley
    August 12th, 2010 @ 3:33 pm

    The only Non-Treasonous Federal Judge u have faced to date.

  10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 12th, 2010 @ 7:08 pm

    FBI does absolutely nothing. if they did their job, we wouldn’t have a usurper in the White House

  11. Bruriah Sarah
    August 13th, 2010 @ 7:06 am

    Hi Orly

    I am not in the legal profession. But an idea occured to me. Is it possible to link all the cases together re: eligibilitly?? In that way, the case could be layed out in stages. Rather than the whole case being tossed out, piece by piece could be dealt with. An example would be the current lawsuits against Obamacare. First Virginia filed. Then Florida. Then their cases are intertwined. As one aspect of the case is supported, the other state benefits.

  12. Harry H
    August 13th, 2010 @ 1:00 pm

    What does “referred to the entire court” actually mean? Does it mean the Supreme Court will convene in open session and hear arguments? Or does it mean Justice Alito is just fishing for enough support to have the Court accept the case?

    Since Clarence Thomas supposedly refused to refer the case, it seems unlikely that a majority would agree to take the case, unless Sotomajor and Kagan are excluded from the count, which would make four justices a majority.

  13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 14th, 2010 @ 7:18 am

    the clerks are running the show.I doubt they actually vote on anything. There is no evidence Thomas even saw the writ. there is no signature of Thomas anywhere

  14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 14th, 2010 @ 7:18 am

    the clerks are running the show.I doubt they actually vote on anything. There is no evidence Thomas even saw the writ. there is no signature of Thomas anywhere

  15. Garnet Creaser
    April 22nd, 2012 @ 1:18 pm

    I love reading and I conceive this website got some truly utilitarian stuff on it!

Leave a Reply