More stonewalling and obstruction of justice on the most incriminating evidence that I produced:Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 0042-68-4425 and his fraudulent statements regarding his attendance in Columbia university
Posted on | April 8, 2011 | 42 Comments
US district Court continues stonewalling and obstructing justice by not posting in the electronic docket my first amended complaint, which shows indisputable evidence that Obama is fraudulently using CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was issued to another individual, as well as the fact that he is lying about his Columbia records. According to the Student Clearing House he attended Columbia university only for 9 months.
US District court in DC received my first amended complaint by certified mail, but is not posting it on the electronic docket and keeps all the evidence hidden from the public. As I am not licensed in DC I can’t post the documents myself, I depend on the clerks. My repeated phone calls to the court remain unanswered, or I am being put on hold for a long time. I need help from my supporters in calling the US District Court in the District of Columbia and demanding to put in the electronic record, available to the public, my first amended complaint with all the exhibits and the proof of service of this complaint, which was submitted to the court, but not docketted as well.
The evidence that I discovered, is the most incriminating to Obama. This evidence will not only remove him from office, but will put him in prison for a long time. With the matter of his birth certificate Obama can wiggle out, saying that he does not have first hand knowledge about his birth and short version BC, is what he got, however he cannot wiggle out of the issue of fraud in his Columbia records and social security, ah he was grown up, when he got his Social Security number and attended Columbia university.
Most of the information on Obama is sealed or scrubbed from the internet, however extensive search provides information, which was omitted in this seal or information, which leaked out. I was able to get an official record from the Student Clearing House, showing that Obama studied there only for 9 months. The media picked it up. I was interviewed by Peter Boyles show in Colorado and was asked about this record. I provided truthful information that this is the official record provided to me by the student clearing house. Joe Farah, editor of World Net Daily was questioned about this record as well. Afer I made this information public apparently there was some pressure from the Obama administration to cover up this record. Bob Unruh, senior political editor of WND wrote to the Student Clearing House and requested verification. Apparently in an attempt to cover up, Student clearing House sent Mr. Unruh an email claiming that Obama was at columbia for 2 years. Mr Unruh called me and stated that he received an e-mail only, not an official record. He felt that it was suspicious that all they provided him, was an e-mail, claiming that Obama studied there for 2 years, but they did not provide an official record, showing that Obama was there 2 years. Mr. Unruh stated that he will write an article showing that the Student Clearing House provided different, conflicting information to him and to me and that was suspicious. He stated that by running this issue, he might get more information regarding Columbia. There must be other individuals out there with records regarding Columbia university.
Usually, when WND publises articles, they have an auther. WND published multiple articels about me and my work and always there was an auther, usually Bob Unruh. An article came out yesterday. Foor the first time in some 3 years of coverage about me the article had no auther. Nobody wanted to put his name on this article. The article did not state truthfully, that after I released records of the Student Clearing House and there was more outcry about fraud in Obama’s vital records, the Student Ckearing House changed it’s story and provided just an e-mail, claiming that Obama was at Columbia for 2 years. The article attacked me, it claimed that I was wrong about Columbia records. It also included a statement “Attorney Orly Taitz, a gadfly of eligibility cases” . I contacted Bob Unruh and demanded an explanation. he stated, that nobody put his name on this article, because it was writtenin colaboration of several individuals. He stated that a part, calling me a gadfly of eligibility cases, was not written by him, but was incerted in the article by the chief editor Joseph Farah. I noted that gadfly has a negative connotation. He stated that WND did not intend to place me in a negative light and as a matter of fact recently a very positive book about a reporter Les Kinsolving came out under the name “Gadfly”. He stated that it was only meant to state that I persevere in multiple legal actions and challenges against Obama. I stated that I was out of town on April 6 and 7 and did not have access to the Internet and computer. I did receive phone calls and mssages from my supporters, stating that they found and article to be offensive and that phone calls of outrage were made to WND. Many felt, that there was some pressure by the obama regime to on the editor WND to throw me under the buss, since the information I provided, was too incriminating. Mr. Unruh stated that he cannot make any changes to the article and he cannot change something personally written by Joseph Farah. He stated that there will be a meeting with Joseph Farah late in the evening of the same day, April 7, and he will raise the issue with joseph Farah.
I am sending now a following e-mail to WND :
“Mr. Farah and Mr. Unruh
in your latest article about my work I was accused of providing the public with wrong information regarding Student Clearing House records on Barack Obama” As an atorney and officer of the court I need to protect my reputation, particularly, when at issue are records submitted to the US District Court. I demand a certified copy of the conflicting records provided to you by the Student Clearing Houe, showing Obama attending Columbia for 2 years. I intend to confront the Student Clearing House and demand retraction and apology for their altering of records and implying that I, as an attorney provide wrong information. As you know, I am an attorney, providing the most incriminating information regading Barack Obama. i am the only attorney, who brought to court evidence, showing social security fraud and education records fraud by Obama.
(redacted)
I demand an immediate release of certified copies of any and all information provided by the Student Clearing House to the WND, so i will proceed in cleariung my name and confronting Obama with this very serious matter of fraud in his educational records.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESq
This e-mail is not confidential, it is being made public and is published on my web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com.
Comments
42 Responses to “More stonewalling and obstruction of justice on the most incriminating evidence that I produced:Obama’s use of a stolen CT SSN 0042-68-4425 and his fraudulent statements regarding his attendance in Columbia university”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
April 8th, 2011 @ 7:47 am
Good for you Orly. I am a frequent reader of WND. When I read the article you mentioned I was a little suprised they would state you were wrong. As I continued to read through the article I was looking for a link to the official written documents they refered to. Of course there were none. And I also noticed no author of the article. I knew immediately they may have gotten their facts confused.
April 8th, 2011 @ 8:38 am
I read the article and found it very negative towards Dr. Taitz. This smells of Soros and Valerie Jarrett. They are getting very nervous. What’s the saying: “You can only cover sh*t for so long” and it’s stinking to high heaven right about now!
April 8th, 2011 @ 8:52 am
Rush : If Obama Wasn’t Born In The U.S. It Would Be Biggest Scam Ever 4-7-11
Rush Limbaugh agrees with Donald Trump when he said that if Obama wasn’t born in the United States it would be the biggest scam ever.Rush says Trump Has “Blueprint” For Obama Defeat — “Just Go At Him”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0JZrA9K7Ec
April 8th, 2011 @ 9:48 am
Orly, there is an extra leading zero in the SS# in the headline that needs to be removed.
April 8th, 2011 @ 11:07 am
Dr. Tatiz,
Could you use the same system to determine if Mr. Obama actually attended the Ocidental Collage in California. It may show him attending as a foreign student.
Just a thought.
Don
TSGT USAF Retired
April 8th, 2011 @ 11:33 am
Orly, I also know that “gadfly” is a perjorative demeaning term, and I tried to e-mail WND, and they must be getting so many complaints that my e-mail was not yet accepted!! Farah as a writer must know what it means, and I think the “men” are overwhelmed with your tenacity and strength, and perhaps try to subtly put you down….do not let this deter you. We know you are hardly a gadfly or “shallow flit about.” They should give you the utmost respect for your efforts. Sometimes people are too quick to applaud themselves and reluctant to encourage others or show appreciation for others. The misinformation and contradictions to what you were finding were very odd also. If you are Queen of the Birthers and a Gadfly….then I would be happy to be in your kingdom and gad about also. Few people have the courage or tenacity to take on what you have taken on. Not even Farah. Putting up highway signs is fantastic, but entering courts and media who mock you is not so easy and doubly fantastic.
April 8th, 2011 @ 11:57 am
The Art Institutes Announces Partnership with Bonnaroo Music and Arts Festival: NEW YORK, NY, APRIL 8, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — The Art In…
April 8th, 2011 @ 12:43 pm
Orly, I believe WND uses Gary Kreep as their own counsel and consultant. If I’m remembering correctly, I think we just found the conflict of interest that led to that article denigrating you.
April 8th, 2011 @ 1:13 pm
Orly,
Yes, they use Kreep as counsel. WND used Kreep’s ‘United States Justice Foundation’ (USJF) to defend themselves against CAIR’s lawsuit over “Muslim Mafia” by David Gaubatz. WND scrubbed most of the pages linking them to the USJF, but there is a saved page here:
https://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.com/2010/01/help-wnd-fight-muslim-mafia_20.html
The Wayback Machine is down at the moment, but WND’s donation page for its legal defense fund involving the USJF was:
https://superstore.wnd.com/s.nl/c.811217/id.30/.f
Wayback Machine can be found here:
https://web.archive.org/
April 8th, 2011 @ 1:19 pm
Orly: Well, the good thing to come out of this is: that I have finally seen evidence that I can see why I have never trusted them (WND)! It’s always something that they don’t want to answer questions about!
Like the birth certificate petitions that I questioned them about for the last 2 years! And now, they have the audacity to prank you off with that article! Is Joe Farah a “Closet Muslim?” Maybe I was right, huh?
And then, instead of sending those birth certificate petitions in (to Congress), Farah has the nerve to use you to take them to the Supreme Court Justice (don’t remember which one), instead of doing what he should have done! That was very suspicious to me!
And if Farah (“allowed”) this to happen, due to some “pressure” from Obama, then, we will know where he stands?! This is my opinion! And I have the right to express it here, on the BEST SITE IN AMERICA!
And, Joe, why did you allow that article to be printed on your site, WITHOUT ANY NAME? That is very suspicious, too! Orly has put up with enough B.S. from so many “slugs” of society, that she doesn’t need this article to further add to her fight!
That was very irresponsible of you, Joe, and to allow your online publishing to allow that article to be printed with some “slanted” connotation!
And Orly is right! She had 2 attorneys that have done nothing constructive and they have made her time and efforts extremely difficult!
And Creep-oid, don’t bother Orly, as she has very serous work to do! Take heed! Cause we all know that you only “soak the public” for funds, when you prank them off with that CONTINUOUS, ridiculous commentary on WND ASKING FOR FUNDS! DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
Can you say: “MOLE…PLANT…PRANKER…AND I BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE ONE OF OBAMA/SOROS’ TOYS! MAKE ME SICK! This is where Orly/Patriots draw the line, jack! Best be careful NOT TO CROSS IT!
Arc Angel…
April 8th, 2011 @ 2:01 pm
Orly, thanks for all your courage and hard work. It dawned on me the other day that perhaps you should check out the adoption records, etc. if is possible since BHO was adopted by Lolo Soetoro. In Illinois years ago when my sister adopted her daughter, the state of Illinois took the baby’s original long form cert. and “sealed” it for protection, privacy, etc. Being an attorney, you would know the process more than I would. Maybe the approach should be to look for an adoption record either in Indonesia or Hawaii. If he’s adopted, there should be no question whatever about his eligibility. (Not that there ever has been with us!)
April 8th, 2011 @ 4:35 pm
Timothy McVeigh was executed, with much less evidence than u have submitted to the Federal Courts….Ode to the Fed.
April 8th, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
Forget about WND a pack of liars. I have sent webpages such as below to them and not a work or change in their garbage reporting on the Obama Story. We consider them indeed to be a government operation. Just enough truth to make the associated lies believeable. You caught them in their operation.
They would not recognize that any BO document with the Birthdate of August 4, 1961 is forged. That is explained Here:
The Nazis in the White House Story: Part 26
Stop Calling Obama A Nigger, He’s Asian
https://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/AsianObama1.htm
Be reminded that a Google search of Obama nigger gets 1,300,000 entries most of them wrong.
April 8th, 2011 @ 6:30 pm
TROUBLE in “paradise”….Drudge has a plethora of stories today showing that SOEBARKAH is a paper tiger:
————
REPORT: Oprah won’t endorse Obama for re-election…
Poll: Obama Struggling With Whites…
Even black voters slip…
April 8th, 2011 @ 7:31 pm
Have you ever thought about only filing documents with properly redacted social security numbers? Or filing them under seal if you believe you have to disclose protected information?
April 8th, 2011 @ 10:54 pm
Numerous articles, foreign newspaper reports, etc on Google about huge scars around back of Obanas head running down left side of neck to adamas apple–with photos! They question if he had brain surgery, was a twin co-joined at birth, was his head cut as a muslim ritual on Ashura (a muslim holiday) etc., etc.!
April 8th, 2011 @ 11:39 pm
A while ago I talked to Joseph Farah. he told me that an agreement with Kreep, was 50% of donations for advertising on WND, these directed e-mails from WND
April 8th, 2011 @ 11:40 pm
again, the problem is the sealed record
April 9th, 2011 @ 6:13 am
I don’t understand your comment. The district court is no longer going to accept your documents that violate Rule 5, FRCP. You can either comply with the rules, and file redacted social security numbers, or you can seek to file under seal. Everybody has to follow the rules.
So, what does “again the problem is the sealed record” mean?
In addition, you keep serving your documents yourself. That’s a separate violation of the rules. As a party you can’t serve anything.
The courts are getting tired of your nonsense. You’re going to have to follow the rules from now on. Play it as stonewalling and obstruction because that fits your Soviet view of how everything works, but it’s a simple matter of requiring even the great Orly Taitz to follow the rules.
April 9th, 2011 @ 7:58 am
Orly, do you have any Phone numbers?
I will be happy to call. Orly I have been getting emails from the United States Justice Foundation asking for money because they have a case before the 9th Court of apeals on May 2nd… Is this something New?
April 9th, 2011 @ 8:45 am
.Published: April 8, 2011 – NY Times
To the Editor:
Re “Donald Trump Gets Weirder,” by Gail Collins (column, April 2):
Even before Gail Collins was with the New York Times, she has written nasty and derogatory articles about me. Actually, I have great respect for Ms. Collins in that she has survived so long with so little talent. Her storytelling ability and word usage (coming from me, who has written many bestsellers), is not at a very high level. More importantly, her facts are wrong!
As far as her comments on the so-called “birther” issue, I don’t need Ms. Collins’s advice. There is a very large segment of our society who believe that Barack Obama, indeed, was not born in the United States. His grandmother from Kenya stated, on tape, that he was born in Kenya and she was there to watch the birth. His family in Honolulu is fighting over which hospital in Hawaii he was born in-they just don’t know.
He has not been able to produce a “birth certificate” but merely a totally unsigned “certificate of live birth”-which is totally different and of very little significance. Unlike a birth certificate, a certificate of live birth is very easy to obtain. Equally of importance, there are no records in Hawaii that a Barack Hussein Obama was born there-no bills, no doctors names, no nurses names, no registrations, no payments, etc. As far as the two notices placed in newspapers, many things could have happened, but some feel the grandparents put an ad in order to show that he was a citizen of the U.S. with all of the benefits thereto. Everybody, after all, and especially then, wanted to be a United States citizen.
The term used by Ms. Collins-“birther”-is very derogatory and is meant in a derogatory way. Had this been George Bush or almost any other President or Presidential aspirant, they would never have been allowed to attain office, or would have been thrown out of office very quickly.
For some reason, the press protects President Obama beyond anything or anyone I have ever seen. What they don’t realize is that if he was not born in the United States, they would have uncovered the greatest “scam” in the history of our country. In other words, they would become the hottest writer since Watergate, or beyond.
Open your eyes, Gail, there’s at least a good chance that Barack Hussein Obama has made mincemeat out of our great and cherished Constitution!
DONALD J. TRUMP
New York, April
April 9th, 2011 @ 2:31 pm
Orly,
Don’t get me wrong. I like WND and Joseph Farah as he and his staff have been one of the few big outfits to hammer Soebarkah relentlessly on his presidential eligibility. I just find it odd that you were denigrated in an anonymous article. That tells me there’s the possibility that Kreep had input in that article and his name would have been left off to avoid conflict of interest claims.
April 9th, 2011 @ 4:13 pm
Orly:…I think the creepoid does use WND for advertising, to “pump the public” for funds! But as far as I know, he hasn’t made a dent in any case against Obama?! And I think “Creepy” is part of the “Obama-Lair?!”
Is Howard a lawyer? And why can’t you post with being nice here to Orly? This is her site. If you’re so concerned with following some rule, why not just write her an email and discuss that, and not “chide” her in a public forum? Why not do this the right way?
Why bawl her out in plain view? I think you need to learn how to communicate, if you are so upset! It’s called MANNERS! There’s a right and wrong way to do things! I think it was rude of you to post that comment! Do you donate? Do you help her with “vital” info, in a proper, respectful way? Are you considered a friend to her?
Barbi: interesting post!
Jon: I have seen that site. With Obama, just about anything’s possible, when it comes to weirdness!!! He could be called “Dr Strangelove!” This could be another reason why he has NOT wanted to reveal his background!
Mach 2…
April 9th, 2011 @ 7:58 pm
Thomas:…creep weasled his way into the case and “stole” 2 of Orlys Clients! And when asked to leave by one of her clients, he wouldn’t do it!
That told us that he was and is an unscrupulous jerk! And him and I had exchanged emails in the past and I told him that I don’t trust him at all! I wouldn’t send him anything, except a “One-Way Ticket” to Antarctica!!!
The legal field has just waaaay too many of these “unethical, absconders” of truth! While Orly is a “beacon of light!”
Mach 2…
April 10th, 2011 @ 4:07 am
The interesting part of all of this is the release of information that Barack Obama was only at Columbia for nine months.My question is,if this were true,was Barack Obama taking a
correspondence course at Columbia,since not one
single individual would come forward during the
trial in Atlah N.Y. that claimed they had ever laid eyes on him.
April 10th, 2011 @ 6:02 pm
Orly, you’re not in Russia anymore. Please find something more valuable with your time, like dodging cars on the freeway.
April 11th, 2011 @ 7:22 am
Bill – you are correct. Not one person came forward during the fake-show trial by the Rev. Manning. Plenty of peers and professors have come forward however.
April 11th, 2011 @ 8:40 am
Is there a possibility that BHO did only go nine months and Barry Soetoro went the previous year and that is why a degree was give? Was he BS first year, went to Pakistan, came back to US and changed name to BHO at school? Was this the first time he ceased using BS?.
April 11th, 2011 @ 10:31 am
Chum lee @ 26 That is interesting news Chum lee,can you give us a link where we can verify this new information ? Thanks
April 11th, 2011 @ 11:00 am
According to PACER Judge Lamberth Ordered your documents filed. It’s probably those clerks messing with you again.
It would seem this is a good sign – that Judge Lamberth is actually reading your papers, and once he did he gave the Order which overruled the clerks holding them.
April 11th, 2011 @ 1:39 pm
NEW ad on Steve Dunham soc sec # !!!…
https://www.scribd.com/doc/52767862/Whose-SSN-is-President-Barack-Hussein-Soetoro-Obama-Using-11-Apr-2011-issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-5
April 12th, 2011 @ 3:40 am
Trump stomps ignorant Greta..
https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/trump-takes-on-foxs-greta-just-show-us.html
April 12th, 2011 @ 7:58 am
they did not post the complaint itself, they posted only the exhibits and important parts of the exhibits are not visible. I will resubmit. I don’t understand, how can they post only the exhibits without the complaint
April 12th, 2011 @ 9:52 am
I got a PACER account long ago so I could keep up with your filings in all the cases, and I’m glad I did, as it’s been very enlightening, especially all teh exhibits you’ve filed as evidence.
When I looked again just now, I see the Amended Complaint on the docket and it does download, and the exhibits as well, but it says some of the exhibits are not legilbe??
I also wonder if Judge Carter’s clerk may be now working for Judge Lamberth, as the entry states you have not properly served the teh U.S. attorney as the documents were sent to the wrong address.
It seems to me (a non-attorney, of course) that if the U.S. Attorney received them, no matter where, that they have been served??
I think you’re correct, just more stonewalling and preventing you from getting at the truth before the next election.
04/08/2011 4[RECAP] AFFIDAVIT of Mailing by ORLY TAITZ. “Let this be filed, The Court notes mailing was sent to improper address for the U.S. Attorney, and time to respond doesn’t run until U.S. Attorney is properly served.” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth.(rdj) (Entered: 04/11/2011)
04/08/2011 3[RECAP] AMENDED COMPLAINT against MICHAEL ASTRUE filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # 1[RECAP] Exhibits)”Let this be filed” by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth.(rdj) Note: Portions of these exhibits are illegible in paper form and on ECF. (Entered: 04/11/2011)
April 12th, 2011 @ 11:09 am
Copied this onto MS Tea Party site https://msteaparty.ning.com/
(unfortunately appears at homepage bottom) 🙁
(no reply)
April 12th, 2011 @ 11:37 am
dunham obama hawaii investigation!…
https://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html
April 12th, 2011 @ 12:04 pm
Plain and simply, I never have trusted WND and Joseph Farah. Typically, he would have sensational headlines and very little substance.
Obama ineligibility has made alot of people alot of money. If the cat ever comes out of the bag though, it could mean every senator, every congressman, every supreme court justice would be subject to punishment. Look for that cat in the bag to be dead before it ever comes out of the bag.
April 12th, 2011 @ 12:04 pm
Plain and simply, I never have trusted WND and Joseph Farah. Typically, he would have sensational headlines and very little substance.
Obama ineligibility has made alot of people alot of money. If the cat ever comes out of the bag though, it could mean every senator, every congressman, every supreme court justice would be subject to punishment. Look for that cat in the bag to be dead before it ever comes out of the bag.
April 12th, 2011 @ 12:04 pm
Plain and simply, I never have trusted WND and Joseph Farah. Typically, he would have sensational headlines and very little substance.
Obama ineligibility has made alot of people alot of money. If the cat ever comes out of the bag though, it could mean every senator, every congressman, every supreme court justice would be subject to punishment. Look for that cat in the bag to be dead before it ever comes out of the bag.
April 12th, 2011 @ 2:43 pm
Pacer shows your amended complaint as docket number 3 and notes that portions of your exhibits are illegible. That may be why they are “not visible”. But hey, if you want to resubmit, knock yourself out.
April 12th, 2011 @ 4:39 pm
they didn’t docket the complaint, only the exhibits
April 12th, 2011 @ 4:39 pm
they didn’t docket the complaint, only the exhibits