More on tyranny in judiciary- story of jailed attorney Richard Fine
Posted on | October 15, 2009 | Comments Off on More on tyranny in judiciary- story of jailed attorney Richard Fine
Re: Richard Fine (CJ Inmate 1824367) – and the Rampart FIPs – Request for input from a Harvard/Stanford Law Professor on theoretical questions in Law…
Dear Prof. [ ]:
Thank you for acknowledging receipt of my message regarding Richard Fine yesterday. He has been falsely jailed since March 4th, 2009. However the victims of the Rampart Scandal, estimated at more than 10,000, have been falsely imprisoned for about 10 years after an official 200-investigators, 2-year probe determined that they were falsely convicted and falsely sentenced by the judges of the LA Superior Court.
Therefore, I would be interested in your input on theoretical questions …
THEORETICAL QUESTIONS IN LAW 1) What is your opinion as a legal scholar of a Superior Court that for 25 years has been hiding the DOCKETS (REGISTERS OF ACTIONS) of ALL files from the public, including parties during litigations – BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL… Does it comply with Public Trial rights? Does it comply with Human Rights pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ratified International Law?2) What is your opinion as a legal scholar of a Superior Court that for the past 25 years has been hiding its BOOK OF JUDGMENTS?
3) What is your opinion as a legal scholar of a Superior Court that for the past 25 years has been hiding its CALENDAR OF THE COURTS?
4) What is your opinion as a legal scholar of a Superior Court that has implemented an AUTOMATIC “WAIVER” OF SERVICE AND NOTICE?
5) What is your opinion as a legal scholar of a Superior Court that has kept FALSELY IMPRISONED OVER 10,000 PEOPLE, ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY BLACK AND HISPANIC, A FULL DECADE AFTER THEY WERE PROVEN TO BE INNOCENT? 6) As a theoretical hypothesis, if all the above statements were true relative to the largest Superior Court in the U.S., serving some 10 million people, how would you characterize the Human Rights record of the U.S.A?
7) As a theoretical hypothetical question, if all the above ere true, how would you grade the justice system in the U.S. today relative to other “First World Nations” or “Western Democracies”, or any other reference group that you may choose to define?
8) As a theoretical hypothetical question, if all the above ere true, how would you grade the U.S. justice system relative to the prescriptions of the U.S. Consittution?
9) In the existing U.S. government system, which agency holds the primary duty to address such problems?
19) Do you believe that Law Faculty have any moral or ethical obligation to speak out under such circumstances?