I moved from published to draft prior article with information about Kevin Davidson. Instead I am posting excerpts from his own blog, which he created and posted on world wide web for millions of people to see. He  himself posted his picture on his blog. It shows that he is not a private person, as he claims now. He publishes a blog, a publication. He brag that he has 75,000  thousands of comments. On his blog he claims that we are a fringe. He calls us a derogatory term “fringe”.

What is his reasoning. He says, that possibly another president Chester Arthur Got in the White House by virtue of fraud and concealment of his birth certificate and of the fact that he was not Constitutionally eligible, as his father was not a US citizen, when he was born. His reasoning, that if it was ok for Arthur, it is ok for Obama.

If someone forges a deed to Mr. Davidson’s house and steels his house by virtue of fraud and forgery, does it make it OK for for another person to steel his car as well, because the first one was not caught? the White House belongs to every citizen, we have a right to ask if he has a valid deed, or whether he got there without a valid US long form Birth Certificate, with Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was assigned to another individual, but later assumed by Obama as his. We want to know if the biggest criminal act of the U.S. history and the World history is unfolding right before our eyes and spineless and gutless judges and Congressmen are de facto aiding and abetting this crime by refusing to investigate, to start discovery, to issue subpoenas and to criminally prosecute Barack Hussein Obama.

That is why we need each and every one of you to write to Congress, demand investigation an hearing of ObamaFraudGate immediately. Let’s confront this issue, resolve it on the merits and move on.

I will be sending more pleadings today. Those will be cc’ed to several Congressmen.

Please help start this investigation asap and get subpoenas going asap. Excerpts from Davidson’s site are posted below.     

Obama fringe beliefs center around the meaning of “natural born citizen” (a qualification for the presidency in Article 2 of the U. S. Constitution). One such theory says …sentences in the Reeves biography:

…Furthermore, Arthur’s legal right to be on the Republican ticket was challenged. A New York attorney named Arthur P. Hinman was hired, apparently by Democrats, to explore rumors that Arthur had been born in a foreign country, was not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus was, by the Constitution, ineligible for the vice-presidency. By mid-August, Hinman was claiming that Arthur was born in Ireland and had been brought to the United States by his father when we was fourteen. Arthur denied the charge and said that his mother was a New Englander who had never left her native country–a statement every member of the Arthur family knew was untrue. The Irish birthplace story was palpably false and was abandoned by Hinman as the campaign progressed. In its place he alleged that Arthur was born in Canada, just across the Vermont border where his mother often visited her parents. little attention was paid to the charge during the campaign of 1880, for Garfield was a young, robust man who could easily be expected to fill one or two terms in the White House.

Gentleman Boss, p. 202-203 (shorter version on Natural Born Citizen blog).

What follows is an account of the Democrat’s attempt to torpedo Garfield’s campaign by planting a forged document. Oh, those sneaky Democrats! (This was very reminiscent of  the Nixon election dirty trick of sending out false information on opposition campaign stationery.)

HISTORICAL BREAKTHROUGH – PROOF: CHESTER ARTHUR CONCEALED HE WAS A BRITISH SUBJECT AT BIRTH

 For further reading see: The Strange Case of Chester Alan Arthur.

Tags: Arthur P. Hinman, British subject, Chester A. Arthur, Leo C. Donofrio, Natural Born Citizen, presidential qualifications, Thomas C. Reeves

← Obama Birth Certificate Number proves it’s a fake – busted

Searching in the Age of Obama →

 

2 Responses to “The Assassination of Chester A. Arthur”

1. Cort Wrotnowski December 19, 2008 at 12:21 am #

   Your characterization of Chester A. Arthur’s truthfulness is inconsistent. First you say he never lied, and then you say it is under study.

   Leo Donofrio also pointed out that Chester Arthur’s own family members say that Chester Arthur lied about his father and other salient matters affecting his candidacy. The fact is that Chester Arthur intentionally created confusion in order to keep critics from getting at the truth.

   As strange as it is, the same form of public hypnosis seems to have gripped the voting public now as then.

   Moreover, Chester Arthur had lots to hide. What would people have said if Bill Clinton burned most of his papers? Well, four barrels each four feet tall were stuffed with his papers and burned on Chester Arthur’s instructions following his death.

   Just so you know, there is additional commentary from a biography of Chester Arthur and other sources that simply say your characterization is dead wrong and you should fix it so you don’t mislead people.

   Chester Arthur did lie about his father so that people would think that was a non-iisue, he lied about his own age, as well as his family. His birth certificate scandal was a distraction to keep people from finding out the real truth: He was not eligible.

   You, whoever you are, are doing this country a great disservice with your phony and misleading analysis.

Obama Conspiracy Theories is your one-stop destination for conspiracy theories and fringe views about Barack Obama. Having an argument with your buddies at the office? You’re in the right place. Check out our featured articles. If you don’t agree with what you see, feel free to add your thoughts to the over 75,000 comments others have left.