More evidence of racketeering in high positions of power: FedEx package with pleadings and evidence relating to Taitz v astrue (Obama’s use of a forged CT SSN) conveniently disappears from the Supreme Court of the US. That’s Pelican Brief on steroids
Posted on | December 8, 2012 | 42 Comments
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
949-683-5411
via Federal Express
12. 08.2012
Attention Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States William Sutter and Mr. Eric Fossum
REGARDING MISSING FEDERAL EXPRESS PACKAGE DELIVERED TO THE SUPREME COURT ON 10.09.2012 9:52 AM AND SIGNED BY D. GAMBLE AND INCORRECT STATEMENTS/INCORRECT INFORMATION IN TWO LETTERS WRONGFULLY DENYING PLAINTIFF TAITZ HER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AND SPECIFICALLY HER RIGHT TO FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
Dear Mr. Sutter and Mr. Fossum,
I am in receipt of a December 3, 2012 letter from Chief Clerk William Sutter drafted and signed by Eric Fossum in regards to denial of Plaintiff’s First Amendment right for Redress of Grievances, which was exhibited twice by the clerk’s office’s wrongful denial of Plaintiff’s right to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304.
In aforementioned letter from you Mr. Fossum provided incorrect information, specifically he stated that there was no order from the clerk’s office denying the “right by Petitioner to file a petition for a writ of certiorari” and that there was no attempt to file a writ of certiorari by the Plaintiff. Exhibit 1 December 3 letter from Clerk Sutter signed by Eric Fossum
1. Please, see attached two Federal Express receipts:
a. Exhibit 2. Federal Express Receipt showing a package delivered to SCOTUS on October 2, 2012 9:12 am signed by J Kouros.
b. Exhibit 3 Federal Express receipt showing a second package sent to SCOTUS on October 7, 2012 and delivered to SCOTUS on October 9, 2012 9:52 am and signed by D. Gamble.
2. On December 6, 2012 around 10:45 am plaintiff Taitz called SCOTUS and demanded to talk to Chief Clerk Sutter in regards to her grievance of wrongful denial of her right for redress of grievances. Assistant for Chief Clerk Sutter stated that he is not available and advised Taitz to talk to a different case analyst, Mr. Traves. Mr. Traves reviewed the computer file of the case and stated that he can see on his internal docket documents filed on October 1, received on October 2, 2012, he can see and can read a letter from Chief Clerk Sutter, which incorrectly stated that Plaintiff is out of time to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Plaintiff was actually over a month early as the final decision was on August 8 and she had 90 days until November 7, 2012), however analyst Traves could not see on the electronic docket a package received by the court on October 9, 2012 and signed by D. Gamble.
It appears that there is nefarious activity in the court and someone threw the package away and either never docketed that package or deleted a docket entry made earlier.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen 08A524 was deleted from the docket of the Supreme court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, austencibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after pressure from the public, media, state representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect or possibly statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case.
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same employee, who signed the denial letter in the case at hand, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition. As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever read a word written in the petition.
Current case deals with undeniable evidence showing Barack Obama using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to e-verify and SSNVS. Exhibits 4, 5, 6, showing Barack Obama using Social Security number 042-68-4425 on his 2009 tax returns and SSNVS and E-Verify reports showing that this number was never assigned to Barack Obama.
Conveniently a package with documents relating to the case of the biggest fraud and forgery and treason in the U.S. history disappears from the Supreme Court of the United States.
Plaintiff Taitz demands reconsideration of her 60 (a) motion to correct an error by the Clerk of the Court and a 60 day extension to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, which was wrongfully denied earlier.
If such extension is not received within three business days, Plaintiff will be filing not a 60 (a) motion, but a 60 (b) motion with the Court seeking a reconsideration not due to error but due to fraud.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
cc:
cc Congressman Darrell Issa
Chairman
House Oversight Committee
2347 Rayburn House Building
Washington DC, 20515
cc Congressman Mike Rogers
Chairman
House Intelligence Committee
133 Cannon House Office building
Washington DC 20515
cc Congressman Sam Johnson
Chairman
House Subcommittee on Social Security
House Ways and Means Committee
2929 N Central Expy, 240
Richardson, TX 75080
cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher
Chairman
House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
2300 Rayburn House Building
Washington DC 20515
US Commission
on Civil Rights
624 Ninth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20425 C
Public Integrity Section
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington DC 20530-0001
Inter -American Commission on Human Rights
1889 F Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C., 20006 U.S.A..
Tel.: 202-458-6002, 202-458-6002. Fax: 202-458-3992.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders
The Honorable Mrs. Margaret Sekaggya
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
International Criminal bar Hague
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Head Office
Neuhuyskade 94
2596 XM The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel : 0031 (70) 3268070 0031 (70) 3268070
Fax : 0031 (70) 3353531
Email: info@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Regional Office – Americas / Bureau régional – Amériques / Oficina regional – Américas
137, rue St-Pierre
Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2Y 3T5
Tel : 001 (514) 289-8757 001 (514) 289-8757
Fax : 001 (514) 289-8590
Email: admin@bpi-icb.org
Website: www.bpi-icb.org
Laura Vericat Figarola
BPI-ICB-CAPI
Secretaria Barcelona
laura_bpi@icab.es
Address: Avenida Diagonal 529 1º2ª
08029 Barcelona, España
tel/fax 0034 93 405 14 24
United Nations Commission for
Civil Rights Defenders
Orsolya Toth (Ms)
Human Rights Officer
Civil and Political Rights Section
Special Procedures Division
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
tel: + 41 22 917 91 51
email: ototh@ohchr.org
Comments
42 Responses to “More evidence of racketeering in high positions of power: FedEx package with pleadings and evidence relating to Taitz v astrue (Obama’s use of a forged CT SSN) conveniently disappears from the Supreme Court of the US. That’s Pelican Brief on steroids”
Leave a Reply
December 8th, 2012 @ 10:26 am
Can Sutter be charged w/interference of an officer of the law in the discharge of her duty?
Thank you Dr. Taitz for your continued fight of all this fraud. Your tenacity is to be commended.
December 8th, 2012 @ 11:09 am
Kagan and Sotomayer took the package !!!!
Once it’s proved that Obummer is a fraud
Kagan and Sotomayer will have to step down.
Kagan did it – and told sotomayer she might as well be an acomplice – ’cause she already is.
December 8th, 2012 @ 11:38 am
“If such extension is not received within three business days, Plaintiff will be filing not a 60 (a) motion, but a 60 (b) motion with the Court seeking a reconsideration not due to error but due to fraud.”
I’m confused. How many people at the Supreme Court are involved in the fraud? Is it just the clerks or does it go higher than that?
December 8th, 2012 @ 12:19 pm
While reading up on Judge Kennedy, I came
across the bio on his clerk, Lauren Willard,
with a photo of her. She appears to
be very wholesome and her words speak
of some integrity and a sense of responsibility.
I wondered if she would be instrumental in
tracking down the disappearing evidence
delivered by FedEx. It’s just a thought
from reading about her and her philosophy.
Since there are underground subversives
now clerking at SCOTUS, she would be
a valuable asset to making sure that when
deliveries arrive, they are safely
docketed and retained. It just remains
being able to contact her for assistance.
https://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2012_spr/willard.htm?ntype=feed
December 8th, 2012 @ 12:25 pm
Please, just die.
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:32 pm
https://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=viewlink&link_id=25&Itemid=100
An abstract from the article found at the link above….
“Fossum, Erik
Accused Party Type
Employee
Accused Party Title
Clerk of the Court Employee
Court or Office
U.S. Supreme Court
Accused State
District of Columbia
City of Complaint
Washington
State of Complaint
District of Columbia
Types of Misconduct
Abuse
Conspiracy
Corruption
Dishonesty
Mail Fraud
RICO
Untruthful
Violation of Constitution
Violation of Rules
Website
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=143:obstruction-of-justice-at-the-supreme-court&catid=25:judicial-corruption-and-d...
Complainant
Windsor-William
Complainant Address
PO Box 681236, Marietta, Georgia, 30068
Complainant Business Phone
770-578-1094
Complainant Fax
770-578-1057
Complainant Email
bill@lawlessamerica.com “
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:33 pm
that what I want to know.
are clerks acted on their own or they are told by the judges to do certain things to take responsibility and liability away from judges?
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:34 pm
Here’s more on the complaints about Erik Fossum.
https://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=143:obstruction-of-justice-at-the-supreme-court&catid=25:judicial-corruption-and-dishonesty&Itemid=55
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:35 pm
no, i am sure this was done by a lower level employee, judges will not get their hands dirty, at least not directly
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:56 pm
More on clerks and staff of the SCOTUS
https://secretjustice.com/Supreme%20Court%2010-7-2011.pdf
December 8th, 2012 @ 1:59 pm
It seems it’s a culture, not just one “germ”.
“no, i am sure this was done by a lower level employee, judges will not get their hands dirty, at least not directly”
December 8th, 2012 @ 2:10 pm
There may be some useful material here, where someone in another matter has already done some investigative research.
https://www.jtalon.tv/solicitorgeneral/michaelbmukasey.html
December 8th, 2012 @ 2:28 pm
When at the Google page above, go to the next page and see more hits where in most of the complaints it is Erik Fossum whose name keeps coming up as the court officer who handled the documents, etc
December 8th, 2012 @ 2:33 pm
Is this lower level clerk Sutter involved? Since he’s the chief clerk, I’m sure he’s giving the marching orders to these low level civil servants whose salaries we taxpayers pay.
Can you seek sanctions against these clerks for abusing your civil rights? Or report them to one of the more conservative Justices on the Supreme Court for further investigation? It seems like a strongly worded letter might be in order, unless you think it’s too dangerous for you in light of your reference to The Pelican Brief.
Be safe my friend.
December 8th, 2012 @ 3:14 pm
The great California tax hoax: $577 billion in hidden assets never revealed to voters
California
(NaturalNews) Is California really as bankrupt as its governor claims? Not if you believe in mathematics and accounting. As this story shows, California has hidden away $577 billion in assets, all revealed in CAFR documents (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) that are becoming increasingly well-known.
California’s government, you see, has two main funds in which money is kept. The first fund, which is bankrupt, covers all government activities and expenditures. But the second fund — the hidden “slush” fund with $577 billion in assets — holds all the money the government generates by conducting “nongovernmental” businesses and activities that aren’t officially part of the government. This money is hidden from California’s taxpayers who are repeatedly lied to and told they have to pay more in taxes to prevent the state from going broke.
Click here to see a complete listing of all the nongovernmental funds that Californians aren’t being told about.
This list includes organizations and assets such as:
• Independent System Operator: $876 million
• The Economic Recovery Bond Sinking Fund: $484 million
• Receipting and Disbursing Fund: $16.6 billion
• State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund: $3.1 billion
• Financing for Local Governments and the Public Fund: $5.2 billion
California’s criminal government hides hundreds of billions of dollars in these funds, then uses that money to hand out juicy contracts to their crony friends and political supporters while financially soaking all the businesses and taxpayers in the state who are trying to make ends meet.
Continue:
https://www.naturalnews.com/038275_California_bankruptcy_hidd…
December 8th, 2012 @ 3:17 pm
this is getting sickening.. it time for people to stand up… a few hundred going there and dragging those idiots out and FIRING THEM .. daring them to return to our courts..
ENOUGH ALREADY..
December 8th, 2012 @ 3:28 pm
I am sure you mean firing from the job. I do not want you to get in trouble with somebody accusing you of advocating violence
December 8th, 2012 @ 4:11 pm
Falcon….FOAD, MoFo! God bless you, Dr. Taitz!
December 8th, 2012 @ 8:04 pm
IN THE SMOKE FILLED BACKROOMS OF THE democratic PARTY MANY EVIL SCHEMES ARE PLOTTED- IT ALL STARTED WITH PELOSI NOT VETTING THE USURPER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES-
December 8th, 2012 @ 8:18 pm
Above the Law? Impeachment for HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. As demanded by all Americans yesterday.
December 8th, 2012 @ 8:34 pm
ORLY SAID:
I am sure you mean firing from the job. I do not want you to get in trouble with somebody accusing you of advocating violence
IHV YES thats exactly what i meant.. let the citizens who pay them go in and litterally fire them.. pack up their belongings and walk them out the door and tell them to never return …
at least it would send a message that we are sick of their illegal ways
will
December 8th, 2012 @ 9:01 pm
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
It appears that our Judicial System is corrupted at all levels.
December 8th, 2012 @ 9:42 pm
When justice is finally served (and it will be), the rope will fit just as snug around these criminals necks as it does around the necks of all the criminals involved in these treasonous acts against this country.
December 8th, 2012 @ 10:11 pm
Falcon: looks like you got a problem? We might say the same thing to you!
December 8th, 2012 @ 10:33 pm
What is your problem Falcon?
December 9th, 2012 @ 12:05 am
New treason from Obama. Arming the enemy. Breitbart.com Egypt’s Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood set to receive a squadron of F-16 fighter jets and 200 battle tanks. No doubt to be used against it’s opposition and later against Isreal. This has got to end.
December 9th, 2012 @ 1:58 am
The report about Obama sending tanks and jets to Morsi is also at WND
December 9th, 2012 @ 6:10 am
I certainly have no idea how this is happening,but it is crystal clear that many folks
will do absolutely nothing to help this woman who only seeks the truth.These folks simply acquiesce to treason.
December 9th, 2012 @ 7:48 am
Theft is a crime. A crime against interstate commerce is a federal offense. Orly, you should file a criminal complaint with the FBI each time this happens. At the very least, it would be on the official record that high crimes of this type are taking place.
December 9th, 2012 @ 9:49 am
Perhaps you can hire a local security company in DC to deliver packages to the Supreme Court Judges in person, with a signature showing receipt. Bypassing the clerks, who need to be summoned by subpoena into court. And file a complaint with their boss and the Human Resource department. There may be an office that is to monitor employees, where people could call and file complaints about specific employees who sabotage you. A deluge of complaints and phone calls may put the clerks on alert that their jobs are precarious.
December 9th, 2012 @ 5:39 pm
And…what I’d like to know from someone on the “inside” is why don’t the SC Judges stop the clerks from screwing around with the cases that come in?
…….
I can’t believe that all of the judges are corrupt? Certainly, some of them would get tired of hearing how the (non)-justices are messing with the “future” of America?! If I were a judge, they’d DO IT or else!!!
December 10th, 2012 @ 5:33 am
If all judges, courts are corrupted what is next?
December 10th, 2012 @ 2:44 pm
Isn’t it funny how these people that do not support Dr. Taitz’s effort, like to lurk around this sight to see what she is up to??? If they aren’t in agreement with her, why do they sneak around & peek to see what is going on here???
December 10th, 2012 @ 6:42 pm
Orly, you have no choice now, but to contact the CA representative in your district, either R or D, and demand that the evidence you have shown is sufficient to impeach the Chief Justice. His main infraction of his charter is his chat with obama in 1980, just after he was elected. Then of course, you have your own pile of complaints against the clerks. I would recommend strongly that you go for the impeachment.
December 11th, 2012 @ 8:17 am
FedEx, look for the union label
Bwahahaha
December 11th, 2012 @ 8:37 am
Wally, it’s not that they disagree with Dr Taitz, in fact the majority of them have the intelligence level to know she’s right. It’s that they don’t want it to be true so they just want her to give up hence the constant attacks.
December 11th, 2012 @ 8:24 pm
Kerry, the FBI is part of the cover up. Robert Mueller, Director of the FBI, received a brief on the entire scam known as Obama Forgery Gate. The FBI will not help us as they are aiding & abetting the Conspiracy just like tried to do during WaterGate.
December 12th, 2012 @ 12:43 am
do you have evidence that they tried to cover up Watergate
December 12th, 2012 @ 6:57 am
Yes I do. Acting Director of the FBi at the time L. Patrick Gray later admitted that under pressure from the Nixon administration, he himself took part in covering up WaterGate. It was speculated that Mark Felt (later revealing himself to be the secret FBI informant known as “Deep Throat” ) leaked information to Woodward & Bernstein at The Washington Post who published their conversations with him to the American people via the Post. Those who were close to Felt later said he leaked the info due to animosity over being passed over as Director of the FBI. It should also be noted that Felt, Woodward & Bernstein were all staunch Democrats. Woodward has received my full briefing on Obama Forgery Gate and yet not a whisper from him. He still works at The Washington Post as an Editor.
December 12th, 2012 @ 12:38 pm
Does anyone friendly to you have a photo? I am a firm believer in that ol’ Chinese Proverb – “One picture is worth 10,000 words.” Most judges with whom I am familiar prefer the photos. If one cannot be found, if you know for whom he works, go the web site and you will likely find one.
December 13th, 2012 @ 8:55 pm
Orly: back during the Watergate Hearings, it was brought out by one of the witnesses, that he overheard a phone conversation that said… and I’m paraphraising here: “…We’re out to get the President…!”
…….
That means that Watergate was a “setup” to take Nixon down cause he balked at the idea of helping the NWO types, when they wanted him to do more to advance their cause! Nixon was only trying to protect his people!
June 26th, 2014 @ 11:05 pm
I have learned, and decended into a more restful sleep.
79 responded, 64 of whom can throw any light on psoriatic patients after applying different herbal la mortgage applications.
The second question was Would you like as long as their first
meeting, Rettmann had told her it would be real, scientific, basis.
This is a profit reason behind the claim.