OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


More evidence of lack of reliability in e-voting, results of the primaries.

Posted on | August 25, 2010 | 2 Comments

Deeplink by Marcia HofmannAn Indian computer scientist was arrested this weekend when he refused to disclose an anonymous source who provided an electronic voting machine to a team of security researchers.

Hari Prasad is the managing director of Netindia Ltd., an Indian research and development firm. He and other researchers have long questioned the security of India’s paperless electronic voting machines. Despite repeated reports of election irregularities and concerns about fraud, the Election Commission of India insists that the machines are tamper-proof.

In 2009, the commission publicly challenged Prasad to show that India’s voting machines could be compromised, but refused to give him access to the machines to perform a review. Earlier this year, an anonymous source provided an Indian voting machine to a research team led by Prasad, Alex Halderman, and Rop Gonggrijp. The team exposed security flaws that could allow an attacker to change election results and compromise ballot secrecy. They published a paper detailing their findings, which you can read here.

According to Halderman, Prasad was questionedSaturday morning at his home in Hyderabad by authorities who wanted to know the identity of the source who gave the voting machine to the research team. Prasad was ultimately arrested and taken to Mumbai, though reportedly hadn’t been charged with a crime.

This turn of events is deeply troubling. Prasad is a respected researcher who helped to discover a critical flaw in India’s voting system. He and his fellow researchers would never have been able to document the weaknesses in India’s voting machines without the help of their anonymous source. This is precisely why anonymity is important: it allows people to make important contributions to the public dialogue without fear of retribution.

The Election Commission of India should have given researchers access to the voting machines in the first place. Rather than attempting to persecute Prasad and the anonymous source, the government should be focusing its attention and resources on the real problem: electronic voting machines with no mechanism for accountability.

UPDATE: According to the Times of India and Reuters, Prasad has been charged in connection with the alleged theft of the voting machine studied by the research team. He has been remanded to police custody until Thursday, August 26.

Related Issues: AnonymityCoders’ Rights ProjectE-Voting RightsInternational

Contact EFF

here is another articles that illustrates problems in e-voting and persecution of civil rights leaders and researches, who disclose this massive fraud to the public

If you look at the results of the primaries you can see the same troubling trends:

1. in spite of only 11% approval rating of the members of Congress, 95% gets re-elected. What is the most reasonable explanation of this dichotomy? Rigged, predetermined elections,using e-voting machines and e ballot counting machines, which are set up to spit out certain result son the election day,  no matter what the actual vote is.

2. you can see, that even when Tea Party candidates are announced as winners and leaders of the movement, those are still puppets, who are allowed to talk only about a couple of issues: lower taxes and spending, that’s it. Even Beck and Palin are not allowed to open their mouth and talk about 3 main issues destroying this Nation:

a. Unbridled free trade and outsourcing of American jobs to the third World Countries with nearly slave labor. Don’t get me wrong. Between an insane liberal Democrat, like Obama, who is spending like a drunken sailor, and a conservative Republican, I will pick a conservative Republican, however even if you have zero spending and zero taxes, you will still lose millions of American jobs and millions will lose their homes and life savings, simply because American workers making $10 an hour cannot compete with Chinese making $1 per hour. Until and unless you bring back the tariffs, that will account for the difference and will protect American jobs, this country and this economy will continue collapsing. None of the gimmicks of Obama administration or previous administration worked or can possibly work. It is simply impossible. We have to place tariffs to protect US economy.

b. stopping amnesty and really closing the borders. Even Palin and Beck supported McCain,  who pushed for Amnesty, which is nothing but a magnet for more illegals and more lost jobs for Americans.

c. removal from offie of the illegitimate Kenyan born communist  usurper  Obama, who is destroying our National Security and economy.

We, as a Nation, are doomed, until we go back to paper ballots and having  new primaries. Otherwise, we are stuck with the same corrupt politicians. If we don’t clean the elections process, this country will end up with a citizen revolt. Unfortunately, by the time it happens, too many US citizens will lose their life savings.  

Comments

2 Responses to “More evidence of lack of reliability in e-voting, results of the primaries.”

  1. Barb
    August 25th, 2010 @ 11:53 am

    I have been listening to Glenn Beck for a long time; Maybe I missed it, but I have never heard him support McCain or amnesty. He doesn’t like McCain and I know he does NOT support amnesty.

    Great article on the voting machines. There is U-tube video in which results are changed, after the 7 people voted, to show it can be done with Diebold.

  2. Spaulding
    August 25th, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

    The reality that voting in the U.S. is completely lacking any mechanism to insure the veracity of votes means no one can know if our votes count for anything. When voting became electronic, while cheating was done with mechanical voting, and ballots were dumped, whomever has access to machines, before or after the presumed tally, determines the results. We may as well poll. Save the money and throw away the machines.

    Our ruling class, both parties, are complicit. Computer systems are a mystery to most people, and thus a wonderful domain for cheating. The original protections involved counting of paper ballots at local precints with party representatives present. Without humans with local interest present, there are no checks, no possiblility of a meaningful recount. We are not a representative republic. This is a harsh, but verifiable statement, as the Indian engineer demonstrated. It is to be expected that the state will punish him for exposing the truth, but engineers discover that their projects fail when they try to cheat and presume that governments should be truthfull too.

    Orly Taitz might have helped expose this obscure but extremely important truth had she become Secretary of State. No surprise that the Democrat operative, minister and real estate tycoon was accorded more votes than Dr. Taitz. There is no way to validate that count. I will write in Dr. Taitz in November and hope others will too. Damon Dunn is so transparently a fraud that he mostly exposes the dishonsty of Republican party supporters in the media who trigger his rags to riches speech and stay clear of very obvious legal inconsistancies. George Soros is very shrewd in targeting state secretaries of state because they are a key to voting fraud.

Leave a Reply