14 Responses to “More evidence of forgery in Obama’s Birth Certificate. Please, write to every attorney general of every state, every congressman, DA, Governor, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secret Service, FBI and demand immediate criminal investigation and prosecution”

1. Pv
   May 16th, 2011 @ 2:38 pm

   https://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20110516/ts_yblog_theticket/obama-offers-surprise-face-time-to-memphis-high-school-seniors
   but…but…Obama opened up today…and got few laughs and few tears while telling a story!

2. FRANK J. FEISTER
   May 16th, 2011 @ 2:43 pm

   IT IS VERY ESSENTIAL THAT ALL OF YOU TRY TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE IS JUST A SMOKE SCREEN TO KEEP YOUR ATTENTION FOCUSED ON SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT REALLY MATTER EXCEPT FOR YOUR OWN INFORMATION.

   YOU MUST CONCENTRATE ON THE FACT THAT EVEN IF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS GENUINE, MR. OBAMA IS STILL INELIGIBLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BECAUSE OF 1 FACT AND 1 FACT ONLY.

   IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT, HIS FATHER AND HIS MOTHER MUST HAVE BEEN U.S. CITIZEN’S AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH IN ORDER TO SATISY THE “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” REQUIREMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. HIS FATHER WAS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH, SO HE IS INELIGIBLE WITH OR WITHOUT A VALID BIRTH CERTIFICATE. THIS FACT IS IRREFUTABLE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS FACT SO THAT YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID ABOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE, EITHER TRUE OR FALSE, MUST BE JETTISONED FROM YOUR MIND SO AS TO ALLOW YOU TO CONCENTRATE OF THE FOLLOWING FACT.

   IF YOU CAN UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT THIS FACT, YOUR MIND CAN BE FREE TO FORGET ABOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE AND MOVE ON TO THE REALIZATION THAT BECAUSE MR. OBAMA’S FATHER WAS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN, MR. OBAMA NEVER WAS ELIGIBLE, IS NOT NOW ELIGIBLE, AND NEVER WILL BE ELIGIBLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

   I TRULY BELIEVE THAT IF EVERYONE CAN PASS THIS FACT ON TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS THEY POSSIBLY CAN THAT MR. OBAMA WILL BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE MUCH FASTER THAN HE WOULD OTHERWISE.

3. Colonel Mustard
   May 16th, 2011 @ 4:53 pm

   Orly Taitz! Have you had any death threats lately? Do you want one?

   Why don’t you go jump off of a cliff, bitch!

4. Victoria
   May 16th, 2011 @ 4:54 pm

   Great analysis – I recall noting that the Obama BC looks nothing like mine issued in 1960, specifically with regards to the typing being different. This video gives a good clear explanation as to why.

   On another note: don’t stop publicizing the Columbia University records fraud. The public needs to know about this issue, and about the university changing their story.

   I’d love to hear what their explanation is – because I’m sure it won’t hold water. Those degree-audit systems are all automated: there’s no way for a typographical error to occur.

5. mickey
   May 16th, 2011 @ 7:47 pm

   https://myveryownpointofview.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/cross-posted-sunahara.jpg

6. Sheeeeeit
   May 16th, 2011 @ 10:05 pm

   I watched twice before posting. It would have been nice to see the magnified area of the twins bc, to see that there is no kerning. It is not shown, and from that distance, with my naked eye, it is impossible to tell. Is it possible that the kerning is actually ink bleed, as typewriters used ink soaked, somewhat damp ribbons for printing? I would not hang my hat on this as absolute proof.

7. Redd
   May 17th, 2011 @ 4:38 am

   Supreme Court Alito speaks in St Louis….
   https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/columns/deb-peterson/article_873af5a6-8008-11e0-8324-001a4bcf6878.html

8. Henry Tisdale
   May 17th, 2011 @ 7:20 am

   Orly, I have already unloaded on the NRC (the entire staff), three senate leaders and 5 leaders from the House. I reminded them that no birther will donate any funds whatsoever to the Rep party, UNTIL IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE UNDERWAY.

   It just occurred to me that perhaps you should appear before a committee with all your documents and answer any question they have on Obama having no documents at all to show he is an American citizen. If you agree, I will call our Florida House members and ask them to bring you in. I will hold up until I hear from you.

9. Warren
   May 17th, 2011 @ 3:32 pm

   While I am quite sure that the document is a forgery, I’m not sold on the kerning argument. There are several reasons. First, if you look at the letter combinations singled out as examples of kerning, to me they appear more likely to be poorly struck keys on an old and worn typewriter. In the case of the “Kap” you can see that the “a” is off slightly to the right of its nominal position, causing it to look like kerning with the “p” when it’s really just an imperfectly centered strike from the type bar. Same for the “ty” in “Maternity” – the “t” is clearly above the line and to the right of its center position. Looks like kerning, but isn’t.

   Second, if kerning was used it would cause the character pitch to vary slightly. However, this doesn’t seem to happen. You can take any decent photo editor and measure the number of pixels from the center of the first character in a string to the center of the last character in a string; then divide by (number of characters – 1) and you will get pixels per character. If kerning was employed it would vary slightly in measurement of different strings. It doesn’t.

   Lastly, it’s my understanding that the content of the BC is coming from a scan of a microfilm of the original BC. It’s not coming from a direct scan of the BC itself. The width of the lines of the characters are highly affected by the conditions under which the original BC was photographed and then the film was processed. It’s a long list of variables, but the characters as typed on the original might be considerably cleaner and possibly lighter and with a narrower stroke than the microfilm makes them look.

   Wish this was the evidence that would settle the matter, but I’m afraid it isn’t.

10. Victoria
    May 17th, 2011 @ 10:09 pm

    Here’s another way to understand kerning:

    The letters created by a typewriter are all equally-spaced, because the typewriter keys are all the same size and shape – like letters on a set of children’s blocks. However, because the letters are different sizes and shapes, when you place different ones together, the end result will be some letters appear to be farther apart than others.

    “Kerning” is how computer-generated type eliminates this effect and causes the letters to appear more evenly spaced.

    Go to 2:45 in the video clip, and look closely at the letters “a” and “p”. Disregard the diagonal red lines and focus instead on the vertical grey line which intersects the “p” and the “a”. Realize that typewriter keys would be incapable of placing those two letters so close together that the right bottom tail of the “a” is aligned with the left top and bottom of the “p” in this manner.

    Imagine a set of children’s blocks with letters on them. If you place two blocks side by side there will always be space between the letters. It’s the same with a typewriter. The keys cannot produce type in which the letters have no space between.

    So “kerning” refers to the way in which computer-generated type eliminates unnecessary space between letters for a more appealing visual effect.

    For more info. and better graphics check Wikipedia.

    Keep on it Orly – and thanks for this great video.

11. Victoria
    May 17th, 2011 @ 10:18 pm

    PS – Don’t drop the Columbia University fraud and cover-up.

    This is a powerful piece of evidence that you’ve uncovered – and they have no way to explain their way out of it.

    None.

    Obama did not “earn” his degree: someone “gave” it to him.

    This could be the crack in the facade that gives way to reveal the clown behind all the costumes and makeup and those big, long, disturbingly white teeth.

12. AirWolf
    May 17th, 2011 @ 11:10 pm

    Hey, Col. Buttermilk:…you are a putz!!! Which means that you’re totally “USELESS and (CLUE)LESS, SALLY!”

    I think Orly is going to solve the riddle of the Crisis:…”it will be the ‘Queen’ takes you and the nwo DOWN, and she’ll do it ‘in grand style’!”

    Arc Angel

13. LANE WEBB
    May 18th, 2011 @ 9:57 am

    THIS IS A VAGRANT ABUSE OF A SUPPOSEDLY CONSTITUIONAL REPUBLIC, OF A PEOPLE THAT ARE SUPPOSEDLY TO BE REPRESENTED BY HONORABLY ELECTED MEN AND WOMEN.

    HOW MANY YEARS ARE THOSE THAT AREN’T OF THE BILDERBERG ELITE MUST NOT ONLY FUND, BUT TOLERATE THIS FOOLISH AND BIZARRE BEHAVIOR OF NEARLY A COMPLETE ADMINSTRATION AND ITS LYING FRAUDELENT ALLIES IN THE CONGRESS?

    THIS IS THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN AN AWESOME POSITION TO DO AS ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUION, THE VERY SAME DOCUMENT THAT WAS ABUSED AND ALLOWED THIS MAN AND HIS KIND OF GOVERNMENT TO BECOME FULLY IMPLEMENTED.

    OBAMA-SOETERO, YOU ARE NOT WORTHY OF THE GOODNESS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. YOU HAVE ENTERTAINED IN THE WHITE HOUSE COMMUNISTS AND DEGERATES. WHY, BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR WICKED WIFE APPROVE OF THEM; NO WONDER YOU APPOINTED THESE HOMOSEXUALS AND LESBIANS TO OFFICE, AS WELL AS THOSE THAT ARE LIKE YOU, AN ADVOCATE FOR ABORTION, YET, YOU AND MICHELLE OPTED TO NOT ABORT YOUR TWO DAUGHTERS! LIARS, TRASH AND COMMUNISTS.

    MAY GOD BE UPON YOU AS YOU DESTROY WHAT WAS ONCE AN HONORABLE OFFICE. I SINCERELY PRAY FOR YOUR SALVATION AND THAT OF AMERICA!

14. Robert Daller
    April 9th, 2012 @ 10:13 am

    I view something genuinely interesting about your web site so I saved to fav.

Leave a Reply