Grinols motion for reconsideration for denial of default judgment

caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov	This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO…	10:29 AM (2 hours ago)
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO…

caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov	10:29 AM (2 hours ago)
to CourtMail

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system.  Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users.  To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

Eastern District of California – Live System

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered  on 3/21/2013 at 10:29 AM PDT and filed  on 3/21/2013

Case Name:	Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number:	2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer:
Document Number:	99(No document attached)

Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge,  Morrison C. England, Jr.:  On the Court’s own motion and pursuant to  Local Rule 230(g), the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration [93],  scheduled for hearing on 3/21/2013, is submitted without oral argument. The  hearing date of 3/21/2013 is vacated. If the Court determines that oral argument  is needed, it will be scheduled at a later date.  (Deutsch, S)(Deutsch, S)

2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward               A Olsen                                              , GOVT &nbsp &nbsp edward.olsen@usdoj.gov, karen.james@usdoj.gov, monica.lee@usdoj.gov, teisha.stogsdill@usdoj.gov
George               Michael Waters                                             &nbsp &nbsp george.waters@doj.ca.gov, lydia.sandoval@doj.ca.gov
Orly                 Taitz                                              &nbsp & nbsp orly.taitz@gmail.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally  by the filer to:

Reply

Reply to all

Forward

caed_cmecf_helpdesk@caed.uscourts.gov	10:43 AM (1 hour ago)
to CourtMail

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system.  Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users.  To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

Eastern District of California – Live System

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered  on 3/21/2013 at 10:43 AM PDT and filed  on 3/21/2013

Case Name:	Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number:	2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
Filer:
Document Number:	100(No document attached)

Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Chief District Judge,  Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the Ex Parte Motion to Remand  [11]. The parties are directed to file a proposed order for consideration  of this filing. Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements  for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed  order (in WordPerfect or Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing  the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rule 101, the definition  for “signature”, you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel.  Please submit your proposed order today, in word processing format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov.  (Deutsch, S)(Deutsch, S)

Activity in Case 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al Clerk’s Notice of Docket Correction

33 Responses to “Judge England postponed the hearing on my motion to reconsider the denial and grant my motion for a default judgment against defendant Obama. There will not be a hearing today, the court will review the pleadings and will advise if oral argument will be needed on another day”

1. BO PE
   March 21st, 2013 @ 12:49 pm

   Why?

   I thought it was for April 18th..

   Do you believe this is a stall tactic because something is going down?

   Michael S. predicts possible Iranian or Syrian strikes..I guees now the imposter supports israel..Really..

   I can only imagine..

   Better late than never… Judge England to get a backbone and do what is right..

2. T.W. Lithotu
   March 21st, 2013 @ 1:00 pm

   Thats great news Orly. I hope that the hearing goese well..

3. Francisco
   March 21st, 2013 @ 3:06 pm

   I think the judicial system in this country needs a complete overhaul.
   I have a demand against my County Government in the State Court system for the last two years, I have paid thousands of dollars to my lawyer, and everytime I ask her about the case, she tells me there was a postpotment, a new motion by the defense, a change of judge, no response to the brief by the County’s lawyers, in other wouds a mental and financial torture, when you try to go through the legal system to resolve disputes.
   I see a lot of similarities in your case and mine. I might even be dead by the time my case is heard by a jury.

4. will
   March 21st, 2013 @ 3:24 pm

   ihv first thing would be for us to know IS DID THE JUDGE SIGN THIS HIM/HERSELF? OR DID some flunky working for him do it..

   i would really like to know
   will

5. blackyb
   March 21st, 2013 @ 3:31 pm

   As I said, it looks like they will not likely do anything towards balancing justice for this country.

6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 21st, 2013 @ 3:46 pm

   there is no signature of the judge, his deputy signed it

7. Donna
   March 21st, 2013 @ 7:02 pm

   Orly, I hope you don’t refer to any of these judges as “HONORABLE” because they are all cowards. None have the right to be called”your honor”

8. Lie Dectector
   March 21st, 2013 @ 7:59 pm

   Isn’t this Postpone big enough issue for Judge English to sign it himself?

   Sound to me like something rotten in Denmark, excuse me I meant to say Sacramento.

9. will
   March 21st, 2013 @ 8:12 pm

   ihv i see to much being done in our courts by these “deputies” and aides and janators probably… its time for the judges to step up to the plate.. its time they speak and put their names on their rulings..
   will

10. Florence Stone
    March 21st, 2013 @ 8:45 pm

    Whatever happened to a person’s right to a speedy trial? All we hear is something was done ‘in error’, needs refiled for some goof up, needs to be postponed for one reason or another! Talk about ‘kicking the can down the road’! Gets infuriating!

11. mary c
    March 21st, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

    I find several flaws that do not sit well with me. First as mentioned above – his deputy signed it. Second – “on another day” is just to wide open. Will we have to wait until December 30th, 4095 for this to get into the courts? The actual original petition called for a speedy decision. This means that this Judge and the rest of the court by not taking action on a matter that is of major jeopardy to this country is treasonous. Will you use this to start criminal proceedings against the courts within Congress and failing that with the all of the state courts?

12. charlene zechender
    March 21st, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

    Leaked attack memo could jeopardize group’s finances
    By Jim Morrill
    jmorrill@charlotteobserver.com
    Posted: Friday, Feb. 22, 2013
    More Information

    TV reporter named McCrory’s communication director
    Editorial cartoon: Secret Blueprint Memo

    RALEIGH A group that sent out a memo with tips on how to attack Gov. Pat McCrory and other Republican leaders exercised “bad judgment” that could jeopardize its funding, the director of a foundation that finances the group said Friday.

    Leslie Winner, executive director of the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, said she was “surprised and disappointed” by the actions of Blueprint North Carolina.

    “(Z. Smith Reynolds) believes in robust debate on issues of public importance, (it) does not support attacking people,” Winner said. “We were disappointed to learn that Blueprint is advocating this strategy…

    “We are taking this seriously. We are determining our options and our obligations. We will get to the bottom of it.”

    The Foundation is providing $400,000 of Blueprint’s nearly $1 million budget, Winner said.

    The memo was forwarded by Stephanie Bass, then Bluprint’s communications director, to the group’s nonprofit allies. The Observer obtained a copy.

    Describing the control Republicans hold on North Carolina state government, it gave progressives a list of recommendations. Among them:

    • “Crippling their leaders (McCrory, Tillis, Berger etc.).”

    • “Eviscerate the leadership and weaken their ability to govern.”

    • “Pressure McCrory at every public event.”

    • “Slam him when he contradicts his promises.”

    • “Private investigators and investigative reporting, especially in the executive branch…”

    Those were among the talking points and action steps in a memo forwarded by Blueprint North Carolina, a partnership of advocacy and policy groups based in Raleigh.

    The memo was emailed to groups last week with a warning: “It is CONFIDENTIAL to Blueprint, so please be careful – share with your boards and appropriate staff but not the whole world.”

    Bass referred questions to the group’s executive director, Sean Kosofsky.

    “If you want to impact the effectiveness of a lawmaker … one way to do that is to find out where they’re weak and use that to your advantage,” he said.

    Among other things, the talking points memo said that “McCrory is extremely thin-skinned.” It also mentioned House Speaker Thom Tillis of Cornelius and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger of Eden.

    It recommends a “staff of video trackers that follow targets’ every move (McCrory/Tillis) and also capture as much video of committee hearings as possible looking for opportunities to feed our overarching narrative (McCrory and the Legislature are out of control…)”

    The memo included slides of progressives’ arguments. There’s some suggestion that they may have already had an effect.

    When House Minority Leader Larry Hall of Durham gave his response to McCrory’s State of the State address last week, he talked about how McCrory’s plan for charter schools “lacks accountability and would allow out-of-state corporations to create online, for-profit virtual charter schools.”

    Those remarks, and ones about charters that followed, were identical to language in the memo forwarded by Blueprint.

    Hall said Thursday he’s not sure where his language came from, that he researches a variety of sources. He said the memo may have taken the language from earlier speeches he gave on the subject.

    Blueprint is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. According to its website, it is “strictly prohibited from participating or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.”

    “All Blueprint activities will be strictly non-partisan,” it says. “Blueprint activities will not be coordinated with any candidate, political party or other partisan entity.”

    Kosofsky said the talking points don’t cross the line.

    He said the group, which acts as a “back office” to other nonprofits, isn’t trying to influence an election. “Office holders, not office seekers,” he said, “are fair game.

    IRS spokesman Mark Hanson declined to comment on the specific case.

    Winner, of the Reynolds Foundation, said she’d talk to her attorney.

    “I don’t know whether it was improper under their tax-exempt status,” she said, “I just know it was bad judgment.”
    Morrill: 704-358-5059

    Subscribe to The Charlotte Observer.

    Read more here: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/02/22/3869144/leaked-memo-outlines-liberal-attack.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy

13. charlene zechender
    March 21st, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

    Another voter registration scandal

    Post to Facebook
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    2
    Post to Twitter
    Add to LinkedIn
    Add to Google Bookmarks
    Post to StumbleUpon
    Add to Reddit
    Send via E-mail program
    Print with PrintFriendly

    By Scott Walter | March 1, 2013, 1:39 PM EDT

    Research Topics: Advocacy/Activism, Art Pope, Blueprint North Carolina, Civitas, George Soros, voter registration

    Over at PhilanthropyDaily.com, I have a piece on two scandals breaking out in North Carolina. The first scandal involves thousands of improper voter registrations in a scam that was duplicated in all 50 states this election cycle. The second concerns left-wing nonprofits in the state, whose secret strategy to attack leading conservative office-holders was leaked. Even the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, which is North Carolina’s answer to the Ford Foundation, was gravely embarrassed, and the state GOP has filed formal complaints with the IRS and the State Board of Elections (SBE). Unfortunately, the SBE is at the center of the voter registration scandal:

    The SBE general counsel wrote Civitas September 26, 2012, to assure them, “We were not contacted by any campaign, candidate, legislator, or political party” regarding registration. Yet the firm that SBE allowed to conduct “web-based” registrations brags on its website’s front page that its clients include “Presidential campaigns,” and its clients page lists “Obama for President Draft Committee.”

    Get the whole story here.

14. JAK
    March 21st, 2013 @ 10:27 pm

    In my experiences with the courts if the judge does not sign an order when push comes to a shove the paper doesn’t mean anything to take to the bank.

15. Thomas
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 6:08 am

    Mrs. Taitz, The “In-Justice” System in this Country Today is TOTALLY CORRUPT!!! They are Playing You!!! They will Toss This Subject around to Different Judges,Attorneys,Peons throught the LEGAL “SYSTEM”… I get sick everytime I read your site and ANOTHER Delay has been Enacted… Its a Damn GAME For these People in The Government!!! They DO NOT CARE Who they Hurt as Long as THEY Get & KEEP thier Power. The Time for PRUNING THE TREE OF LIBERTY is Fast Approaching!

16. kw
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 8:09 am

    The fix is in, no allowance for evidential adjudication?

17. kw
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 8:10 am

    Or, have I missed something, here?

18. Lie Dectector
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 8:43 am

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.,

    You have placed Judge English in a position to save our Once Great Nation, and restore it to it’s Great Nation status once again.

    Will Judge English run and hide like a coward, like so many judges have already done when confronted with this issue, or will he step forward and do the RIGHT THINGS, and go down in history as a Great American Patriot along side you Doctor.

19. Francisco
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 11:36 am

    I think the plan is to keep postponing, prevaricating, obfuscating, so that once Obama is out of office in three and a half years, the American public would be so relieved that they would forget about the crimes committed by Soetoro and his accomplices.

20. Bruriah Sarah
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 12:58 pm

    Dr. Taitz

    I am wondering if the following remedies are possible:

    1. Getting a new Judge – unless you think this judge is impartial.

    2. If not, is it possible to sue the judge ?
    https://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_judge_be_sued_for_violating_a_defendant%27s_civil_and_constitutional_rights

    I don’t know if this applies to prosecutors as well.

21. Lie Dectector
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 2:14 pm

    Why is everything that I post using my name “James Durwood Johnson” not posted?

    I think there are a lot of dishonest sneaky coward who try to intercept postings from people that they know will be posting thins that just don’t want posted.

    When I first started reading this Web-Site, I thought that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was some kind of a kook. The more I read and researched what I could about what appeared on this Web-Site, the more I became convinced that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is not only the Greatest American Patriot we have today, she is also very brilliant, and tenacious in her gallant effort to save American.

    What really befuddles me why aren’t most true Americans 100% behind what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is doing.

    If Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. fails in her effort to save America, everybody in America loses BIG TIME! I mean RED, YELLOW, BLACK, or WHITE, RICH or POOR, LEGAL or ILLEGAL we all END UP BIG LOSERS.

    It should be a plane as the nose on everybody’s face that “WHAT’S HIS NAME” is destroying America as fast as he can.

    America, please WAKE UP before it’s too late.

22. Lie Dectector
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 2:26 pm

    Why is everything that I post using my name “James Durwood Johnson” not posted?

    I think there are a lot of dishonest sneaky cowards who try to intercept postings from people that they know will be posting things that they just don’t want posted.

    When I first started reading this Web-Site, I thought that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was some kind of a kook. The more I read and researched what I could about what appeared on this Web-Site, the more I became convinced that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is not only the Greatest American Patriot we have today, she is also very brilliant, and tenacious in her gallant effort to save American.

    What really befuddles me, is why aren’t most true Americans 100% behind what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is doing.

    If Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. fails in her effort to save America, everybody in America loses BIG TIME! I mean RED, YELLOW, BLACK, or WHITE, RICH or POOR, LEGAL or ILLEGAL we all END UP BIG LOSERS.

    It should be as plane as the nose on everybody’s face that “WHAT’S HIS NAME” is destroying America as fast as he can.

    America, please WAKE UP before it’s too late.

23. Lie Detector
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 3:09 pm
24. Lie Detector
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 3:30 pm

    For my whole life the United States of America has been consider by most educated people here on Earth as the best county on Earth, but that appears to be changing as fast as “What’s His Name” can do it, with the ill gotten powers bestowed upon him after deceiving most Americans.

    I beseech all good Americans to do anything and everything A.S.A.P. that they can to aide and abet Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. in her valiant crusade to Save America.

    Your’s Truly,

25. Elizabeth
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 4:03 pm

    Lie Detector,

    With all due respect, maybe the reason
    your male name James Durwood Johnson
    isn’t being posted is because there
    are so many aliases that you have
    been using over the last year.

    I remember you as an elderly woman,
    at one time, then you became about
    a dozen other people, recognizable
    by your modus operandi, as the cops say.

    You use the same title for Dr. Orly:
    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

    You always refer to the monster-in-chief
    as ‘what’s his name’

    and you always close with
    “America, please wake up before it’s too
    late.”

    I must have become a detective
    from watching the Sherlock Holmes
    series.

    I wondered if you had gone underground
    as had not seen the above phrases
    in any post for a few months.

    It’s all too funny!!

    Just be yourself!!

26. Richard Risch
    March 22nd, 2013 @ 5:18 pm

    I was told many years ago, by a prominent Ohio attorney, that ‘judges come from attorny’s that couldn’t make it in private practice’. Many are bought and paid for before they render their first verdict. Watching Orly go against the judicial system reminds me of how much truth there was in that statement.

27. Lie Detector
    March 23rd, 2013 @ 8:11 am

    Elizabeth,

    I would very much like to just use my name, but when I do that, it doesn’t get posted.

    I’m not trying to fool anybody, and you can plainly see that by the same phrases that I repeated post.

28. Lie Detector
    March 23rd, 2013 @ 8:15 am

    Oh, Elizabeth,

    I forgot to mention that I never used an alias even once until my postings were not posted anymore.

29. Lie Detector
    March 23rd, 2013 @ 4:26 pm

    Elizabeth, aren’t we both on the same side, on this “What’s His Name” issue?

    If so, lets all work together and stop this silly nit picking.

    I truly believe if all Americans who want really the best for this Country, got behind Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. and help her in any and every way they can this whole mess could be put to rest very quickly.

30. Lie Detector
    March 23rd, 2013 @ 4:29 pm

    Elizabeth, aren’t we both on the same side, on this “What’s His Name” issue?

    If so, lets all work together, and stop this silly nit picking.

    I truly believe if all the Americans who really want the best for this Country, got behind Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. and help her in any and every way they possible can this whole “What’s His Name” mess could be put to rest very quickly.

31. Elizabeth
    March 24th, 2013 @ 8:51 am

    Lie Detector,

    Think back to what your first
    post name was. I cannot recall
    now, but since then, several
    of them were utilized and that
    is fine with me. I just thought
    that maybe your James Durwood
    Johnson is being barred for a reason
    .. and that is so many other names.

    Yes, all on the same side.
    But a march on D.C. will be the
    way to go if all else fails.

    Americans are fed up and ready
    to protest vocally, en masse.

    I just hope the shooting is
    non-existent, that the offenders
    come out peacefully, and we get
    a brand new government, of the people,
    for the people, by the people.

32. Richard Swollan
    March 28th, 2013 @ 4:35 am

    When’s the march on DC? I want to get a bus ticket. Go Orly!

33. Rosario
    June 30th, 2014 @ 4:09 am

    Terrific post however , I was wondering if you could
    write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very thankful if you could
    elaborate a little bit further. Kudos!

Leave a Reply