Aug 19th, 2015 1:01 pm by Jim Hoft

Jeb Bush blasted Donald Trump in his latest interview on Telemundo. Bush told the Hispanic audience that he would pass … 11 Comments

15 Responses to “Jeb Bush Trashes Trump In Spanish TV Interview – Promises Amnesty. Taitz to Jeb Bush: why don’t you run for president of Mexico, you’ll get high poll numbers there”

1. Judy
   August 19th, 2015 @ 1:33 pm

   obama for amerika paid perkins coie $7.2 MILLION
   https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2015/08/19/trumps-zombie-claim-that-obama-spent-4-million-to-conceal-school-and-passport-records/

2. The Constitution...
   August 19th, 2015 @ 1:52 pm

   Hey, Jebi…

   Considering it was your father that mentioned the NWO on TV, when he was President, I find it hard to believe that you are going to “stray” from the fold????

   LOLOL! Oh, Orly, once again, you “do have a way with words!!!!” 🙂

3. The Constitution...
   August 19th, 2015 @ 1:54 pm

   With that statement Jebi made, he is revealing his true persona…

   His transparency is showing!!!!!!!! 🙂

4. Judy
   August 19th, 2015 @ 2:04 pm

   rubio and walker to attack Trump after labor day
   https://therightscoop.com/fox-news-rubio-and-walker-planning-major-attack-on-trump-to-reset-the-primary-soon/

5. John
   August 19th, 2015 @ 2:51 pm

   No need to worry Judy, Trump is going to take all 50 states.

   https://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/prediction-donald-trump-may-win-all-50-states-awareness-of-invincibility-dawning-on-gop-establishment-media-voters

6. HB
   August 19th, 2015 @ 2:52 pm

   What do you expect from someone who’s father was involved with JFK’s death, and a grandfather who did business with Hitler?

7. Veritas
   August 19th, 2015 @ 2:57 pm

   Jeb is pandering.

   Rush with a good point today.

   We are NOT talking about “immigration,” but rather “invasion.”

   Hence, Jeb is promoting amnesty for invaders.

8. Kevin J Lankford
   August 19th, 2015 @ 3:53 pm

   People must know there is some thing seriously wrong when a presidential candidate is pandering to illegal aliens with campaign promises. But then they are a perfect cover for voter fraud. They will claim their hispanic support whether real or not accounts for their inflated vote count, ignoring the fact they have no voting rights.

   Then just as bad is the three; rubio, cruz, and jindal, who are not qualified candidates. But then, if people were aware of the real history of the bush family, they would have disqualified all three of them.

9. Veritas
   August 19th, 2015 @ 4:01 pm

   Telemundo is affiliated with NBC

10. Arlie
    August 19th, 2015 @ 5:50 pm

    A Must read and pass on – crucial info:

    http://www.theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/08/19/defeating-the-gope-road-map-a-message-to-donald-trump-and-ted-cruz-supporters/

    the gop changed some of the primary rules. And in some states you must be a registered Republican to vote in the primary. It’s called a closed state.

11. Virginia in VA
    August 19th, 2015 @ 6:44 pm

    Orly, as a constitutional lawyer, can you tell us your view of whether “Birthright Citizenship” is constitutional and whether children of illegals can be citizens? It would be great to know your view.

12. winnybar
    August 19th, 2015 @ 8:09 pm

    The Nazis in the White House: Part 61
    Obama Birthday Card To Thailand Father
    https://www.hoaxofthecentury.com/ObamaThailandFatherBirthday1.htm

13. turnright
    August 19th, 2015 @ 11:42 pm

    HB… I think it was in something Mark Lane wrote, or else perhaps Colonel L Fletcher Prouty (he was in charge of procuring the ships): The two supply ships that were loaded and ready to go in landing our troops and re-supplying the invasion forces at the Bay Of Pigs, were named the “Barbara” and the “Houston”. A scenario too coincidental to not have George H W Bush written all over it.

    And Felix Rodriguez, one of the triggers at the Kennedy hit, was personally escorted into this country and introduced to the CIA by Bush at the fall of Cuba’s Batista. Rodriguez was a top assassin for Batista and while affiliated with the CIA was an integral part of Operation 40, our government’s Murder Incorporated.

    Chuck Giancana says in his book about his brother Sam “Mooney” Giancana (“DoubleCross”), that one of the hit men was a Cuban postmaster. Rodriguez’ official job in Cuba was as a postman… same difference. So, seemingly, Bush was not only integrally involved in the Bay Of Pigs, but when it went south and Kennedy was blamed (JFK had to do what he did) Bush, our former prez, was close to, if not personally involved in, the whack on Kennedy. There is so much more.

14. Veritas
    August 20th, 2015 @ 5:47 am

    AMNESTY seems to CONTRAVENE the 14th amendment if children born in the USA to ILLEGALS are NOT REALLY entitled to anything related to “Citizenship.”

    A Supreme Court decision stated that two specific demands had to be met by foreign parents who brought a child into the world in the USA.

    They have to

    1) HAVE A PERMANENT DOMICILE in the USA (which ILLEGAL INVADERS CANNOT HAVE)

    and

    2.) be “CARRYING ON BUSINESS” (that ain’t happenin’ if a person is here ILLEGALLY!):

    —————

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark

    In the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), the Supreme Court ruled that a person who
    is born in the United States
    of parents who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of a foreign power

    * whose parents have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States

    * whose parents are there carrying on business and

    at the time of his birth, a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

15. Veritas
    August 20th, 2015 @ 5:44 pm

    On August 20 O’Reilly presented two “Constitutional experts” who sided with him that the 14th amendment applies to ALL babies born here.

    There are others who have savvy knowledge about the matter who flatly disagree and these have not been invited to speak on O’Reilly’s program…or how about a debate between two guests?

    By having only yes-men for O’Reilly’s point of view, the public has no access to critical insight to make an informed decision, but is forced to rely on Bill’s status as an “immigration illuminato.”

Leave a Reply