Interview with expert Doug Vogt. Unfortunately his case was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction
Posted on | November 16, 2013 | 13 Comments
Doug, I am sorry about the dismissal. We knew that the judge will state exactly what he stated, however at least you put an effort and you filed, which cannot be said of Arpaio. I remember Linda Jordan, Susan Daniels and a few other people criticized me claiming that I did not do enough, that I missed something. Today everyone can see that it is extremely difficult. 46 attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs tried. Nobody succeeded. |
They will realize what the purpose of my filing really is. All Americans will know for sure that there was a takeover of the government and we no longer live under the laws Constitution of the United States. At that point other loyal Americans are going to have to decide what the next step is.
Doug Vogt
Category: Dr. Orly TV; Videos, Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, LINKS, Obama Fraud Gate, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Radio and Media Broadcasts, Supporting Documentation
Comments
13 Responses to “Interview with expert Doug Vogt. Unfortunately his case was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction”
Leave a Reply
November 16th, 2013 @ 6:33 pm
FUKINO IS THE FORGER
November 16th, 2013 @ 6:34 pm
FUKINO IS THE FORGER
November 16th, 2013 @ 6:35 pm
no, it is not Fukino, another person.
November 16th, 2013 @ 6:36 pm
no, it is not Fukino
November 16th, 2013 @ 8:40 pm
Oily, Vogt is as crazy as you, crazy bitch, meschuggene …
November 17th, 2013 @ 6:17 am
The Judge said he Did NOT HAVE STANDING???
If THE PEOPLE, who ALL of These BUFFOONS Work For, Including THIS JUDGE, Don’t have Standing?
THEN WHO IN GODS NAME DOES?????????
Simple Solution… Lets STRING THEM ALL UP!!!
November 17th, 2013 @ 6:37 am
A true “European” would not speak like that, number 5. This could be a case of an ex-pat “wannabe.” On the old Greta Wire wasn’t it Foggy who used “oily” as a pejorative?
November 17th, 2013 @ 7:20 am
Vogt should just resubmit the commission properly. As the clerk erred in the designation and so the Judge ruled in accordance, without prejudice. Didn’t he then also clear the docket?
November 17th, 2013 @ 8:07 am
There was no designation when he filed. That is the main issue. The clerk gave him no alternative.
November 17th, 2013 @ 9:16 am
This judge is going to lose on appeal. The law is very clear.
November 17th, 2013 @ 10:20 am
On Fukino- – recalling this – – -““I also plan Saturday to thank Dr. Chiyome Fukino for confirming my factual allegation that there was/is an original, typewritten 1961 ‘vault’ COLB that has not been made public and that the true ‘original’ COLB is in official files. That confirmation makes Barack Obama a liar, on the last weekend of the campaign. Thank you, doctor.” https://www.redstate.com/jaytea/2008/11/02/state-of-hawaii-backs-andy-martin-in-obama-b/
November 17th, 2013 @ 11:17 am
Barbara,
sadly, I believe that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will affirm the decision of Judge Robart. I represented presidential candidates, Allen Keyes, and they ruled against them. 9th circuit rule against Allen Keyes, I do not believe they will find standing or subject matter jurisdiction in the case brought by Mr. Vogt.
I believe that the 9th circuit would confirm the decision of the District court and the Supreme Court will refuse to hear it certiorari, even though I personally agree with Mr. Vogt
November 18th, 2013 @ 9:39 pm
Orly,
Can you give us your comment on the two cases discussed in this article?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/11/18/an-update-on-operation-fast-and-furious-n1748651