OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Intermediate victory in Indiana, Judge Shaheed signed an order to recuse himself in spite of opposition by the defendants

Posted on | April 12, 2012 | 8 Comments

Thank god. I just got word from my people in Indiana, judge Shaheed signed an order to recuse himself.

the case is being moved to Morgan county, which is less affected by the corruption of the capitol city. We are waiting for the new judge to be assigned.

Attorney General of Indiana is clearly playing dirty. I still did not receive the pleadings. I got word from one of the plaintiffs, who received the pleadings that AG of Indiana sent to judge Shaheed copies of the pages from this blog, saying that it means that the plaintiffs are belligerent and that is the reason why my motion to recuse judge Shaheed should be denied.

1. tough luck, judge shaheed granted my motion

2. it is clear that all of these AGs and other defendants in different states are working together

there is a concerted effort by multiple corrupt puppets of the regime

3. this is a complete idiocy for licensed attorneys to copy pages of someone”s blog and expect a judge to rule based on a blog.

I can write anything on a blog. I can write on my blog  that a judge has a big nose. So what? Does it mean that intellectually challenged and treasonous attorneys should act like five year old cry babies and run to the judge and complain about something written on my blog? really? The judge needs to rule on evidence on the record, not on something written on the blog.  Grow up people and stop committing treason against the United States of America. Stop aiding and abetting usurpation of the U.S. presidency. Grow some spine and some other parts that you are obviously missing and stipulate that indeed the evidence shows Obama to be committing elections fraud and using forged documents and they would stipulate that he needs to be removed from the ballot. File criminal charges against Obama and show your legal abilities by successfully prosecuting the forgery and fraud case against Obama and sending him to prison for the rest of his life for what he did to this nation. That what you need to do, if you are attorneys with any integrity and decency.

You are welcome to copy this page and run with it to the judge as well!

Category: HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, Obama Fraud Gate, orly taitz attorney, Orly Taitz civil rights leader, Orly Taitz doctor and attorney, Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012, Orly Taitz Hawaii, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate, Orly Taitz Obama social Security number, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Orly Taitz subpoena, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities, Supporting Documentation

Comments

8 Responses to “Intermediate victory in Indiana, Judge Shaheed signed an order to recuse himself in spite of opposition by the defendants”

  1. William Reade, LTC USAR (ret)
    April 12th, 2012 @ 10:41 am

    Orly, just rember that Judge told you that you were wrng because it had been twetered BLOGDed.So it must be so. Your statement about the SAOS’s and the AG’s is right on.

    I wish to file a Criminal Complaint against the Secretary of State, William Francis Galvin*, and the Attorney General, Martha Mary Coakley** of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for Breach of Contract, and theft, as well as denial of my right to “Due Process” by acts of “Nonfeasance and Malfeasance”. Also I believe they and others are conspiring to influence the outcome of the General Election in November, by controlling the Ballot Process.
    Malfeasance is a legal term that refers to an individual intentionally performing an act that is illegal. Malfeasance is related to two other legal concepts: misfeasance and nonfeasance. Misfeasance is a legal act performed wrongfully, for instance, if a public official or a lawyer did something that was not illegal but is mistaken or erroneous.

    . Nonfeasance: The intentional failure to perform a required duty or obligation.
    Nonfeasance is a term used in Tort Law to describe inaction that allows or results in harm to a person or to property. An act of nonfeasance can result in liability if:
    (1) the actor owed a duty of care toward the injured person,
    (2) the actor failed to act on that duty, and
    (3) the failure to act resulted in injury.

  2. SC Warrior
    April 12th, 2012 @ 12:16 pm

    Orly: I think this bodes well for you. They turn down a request from the govt not to do this, so…maybe the winds of justice are beginning to work for you?!

    And he did the right thing by recusing himself. That is great!

  3. Rod Riddle
    April 12th, 2012 @ 12:55 pm

    Who wrote this?

  4. Mike Palmer
    April 12th, 2012 @ 1:05 pm

    As for State Attorney Generals playing dirty, my bubble has been burst also by personal experience here in Arizona. (Pro se federal civil rights lawsuit suing the Justices of the Arizona Supreme Court for literally legislating from the bench – a violation of Arizona’s Distribution of Powers.) I thought our latest AG, a Republican, would be different. But I was wrong. In addition to violating his oath to support our constitution, he has (I say) misquoted and misappropriated case law and generally threw stuff against the wall to see what would stick.

    Now the FBI is investigating him for alleged campaign finance fraud.

    I’m beginning to wonder why we play the game in the courts?

  5. stevem
    April 12th, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

    Mathematically wouldn’t one think you’d eventually ‘get’ an unbiased, fair Judge?
    Maybe we should interview Judges for bias like
    Judges interview Jurors.

  6. order company checks
    April 12th, 2012 @ 6:52 pm

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% positive. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers

  7. Jefferson Wesler
    April 20th, 2012 @ 12:33 pm

    I’m impressed, I have to say. Really rarely do I encounter a weblog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you might have hit the nail on the head. Your concept is excellent; the issue is one thing that not enough individuals are talking intelligently about. I am very blissful that I stumbled throughout this in my seek for one thing referring to this.

  8. G
    September 2nd, 2022 @ 1:31 pm

    judicial immunity lets them do whatever they want, and there are no safeguards for anyone, because the system is corrupt, and it will be corrupt forever as long as you let them have immunity — a ridiculous concept to begin with — one polices himself. there are no checks and balances on the judiciary in the usa, and therefore things will be the same until the concept of immunity exists.

Leave a Reply