Intellectual dishonesty at CNN
Posted on | February 17, 2011 | 3 Comments
Intellectual dishonesty at CNN
Mr. Toobin and Mr. Cooper
I would like to point out that your intellectual dishonesty regarding the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama.
First, off Vattel is specific, § 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
continuing on in the same section; I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
Let’s review what Obama says about himself.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
What does the United States Constitution say;
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
What did the first United States Supreme Court Chief Justice state to George Washington?
Dear Sir,
Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.
I remain, dear sir,
Your faithful friend and servant,
John Jay.
How does Barach Obama with a foreign father, free from foreign influence?
Why does the Kenyan Government state that Barack Obama was born in Kenya?
James Orengo, full quote; “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?
The current Gov of Hawaii Neil Ambercrombie has stated there is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. Tim Adams, former election worker in Hawaii has
stated the same, there is no Birth Certificate in Hawaii for Barack Obama.
The COLB that has been posted is a fabrication and forgery. I have an extensive blog that covers the Obama COLB forgery, newspaper artciles that state ‘Kenyan-born’, statements from the Kenyan Parliment.
Next time when asked, please point to the extensive newspaper articles that state ‘Kenyan-Born’ Barack Obama even when running
CNN host’s and so called legal experts have time and again, proven their intellectual dishonesty and outright fabrication of lies regarding an illegal
undocumented foreigner Barack Abdullah Hussein Obama.
Please advice when the United States Constitution was amended to allow ‘anyone born’ in the United States the right and privilege of the Presidency.
Where in the 14th Amendment does it grant ‘Natural Born Citizenship’ to anyone?
Alexander Porter Morse
A natural-born citizen has been defined as one whose citizenship is established by the jurisdiction which the United States already has over the parents of the child, not what is thereafter acquired by choice of residence in this country. NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES. Eligibility for the Office of President. Alexander Porter Morse. 66 Albany LJ 99 [1904].
In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.” Most Indians could not meet the test. “Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102.
“(CT:CON-349; 12-13-2010)
a. Acquisition of U.S. citizenship by birth abroad to a U.S. citizen parent is governed by Federal statutes. Only insofar as Congress has provided in such statutes, does the United States follow the traditionally Roman law principle of ?jus sanguinis? under which citizenship is acquired by descent.
Per the Naturalization Act of 1790 the closest Act from the Adoption of the United States Constitution.
The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were “free white persons” of “good moral character”. It thus, left out indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and later Asians. While women were included in the act, the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States….” Citizenship was inherited exclusively through the father.
Citizenship was inherited exclusively through the father, jus sanguinis.
Bloodright inheritance, Jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood) is a social policy by which citizenship is not determined by place of birth, but by having a parent(s) who are citizens of the nation.
In closing take note from a recent newspaper article from Zanzibar; The Citizen
For more than 200 years US citizen could not pick a president who has roots outside the country.
https://nobarack08.wordpress.com
also youtube video’s
www.youtube.com/syc1959
regards;
syc1959
Comments
3 Responses to “Intellectual dishonesty at CNN”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
February 17th, 2011 @ 9:11 am
MY Letter to anderson cooper and O’Reilly.
I understand that a gag order has been put upon you in December 2008 not to speak of the eligibility issue of Obama. However, by speaking about it and relating the wrong information only makes you look complicit and most all stupid.
Do you not understand that at least 180 million Americans know what a naturalized and natural born citizen is and that you do not. Actually, there are 4 different ways you can become a US citizen. That said, to be president of the United States, you MUST BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. That means that you must be a natural born citizen and have TWO natural born parents in the United States.
Now, Obama admits that his father is Barack Obama SR. Well sir, Barack Obama SR was a Kenyan, British born national and never was or meant to become a citizen of the US. Therefore, Barack is not eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. You can say that he is a citizen but you can not say that he is eligible for the office of president. The same circumstances apply to the Vice President.
All presidents since 1787 were eligible except Chester A. Arthur. All presidents have proven they are eligible by releasing all documents of proof. Barack Obama is THE ONLY PRESIDENT WHO HAS NOT RELEASED ANY DOCUMENTS OF PROOF!
The rule of NATURAL BORN citizen was included in the constitution by our founders to prevent what has happened today. You have helped to install an un-American, muslim usurper to the highest office of the land. Barack Obama is a traitor and should be arrested and thrown in jail. He knows he is illegal.
If Barack had been born on the White House steps, he would not be eligible to hold the office of President of the United States.
He is destroying this country that is obvious to any human with half a brain with the help of George Soros his puppet master.
We want him removed from office and we will succeed.
Below is a link that explains Vattel and natural born. There are now over 200 lawsuits regarding this issue.
https://www.puzo1.blogspot.com
Barack Obama has been indicted in Tonowanda, NY Look it up. There is a warrant for his arrest.
February 18th, 2011 @ 8:00 am
“HOUSE VOTES TO OVERTHROW ‘CZARS'”
By ROBIN BRAVENDER
Updated: 2/18/11 9:13 AM EST
Excerpt:
“The House voted Thursday to dethrone nine White House “czars.”
Republicans successfully added an amendment to the continuing resolution that would leave President Barack Obama’s senior advisers on policy issues including health care, energy and others out of a job.
The vote was 249-179.
Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) offered the amendment that blocks funding for various policy advisers to combat what he called “a very disturbing proliferation of czars” under Obama.
“These unappointed, unaccountable people who are literally running a shadow government, heading up these little fiefdoms that nobody can really seem to identify where they are or what they’re doing,” Scalise said Thursday. “But we do know that they’re wielding vast amounts of power.”
These so-called “czars” have been favorite targets of Republicans and conservative talk radio hosts, especially energy and climate adviser Carol Browner, who is leaving the administration. (snip).
“This is a person who’s continued to do things behind closed doors,” Scalise said of Browner.
GOP lawmakers assailed Browner’s office after a recent report showed that the White House rewrote crucial sections of an Interior Department report to suggest an independent group of scientists and engineers supported a six-month ban on offshore oil drilling.
“It was found out that it was the climate czar that actually doctored the president’s own scientific study to try to say that scientists that the president appointed recommended a moratorium on drilling,” Scalise said. “It turned out the scientists didn’t say that at all.”
A federal investigation found no wrongdoing by Browner.
But Scalise had harsh words to go around for the other “czars,” too. “There’s actually a czar out there trying to still impose a cap-and-trade regime,” he said of the special envoy for climate change, Todd Stern, who works at the State Department.
The amendment would defund the White House “green jobs czar” slot that has been vacant since Van Jones resigned in 2009 after reports surfaced that he signed a petition seeking an investigation into whether the U.S. government was behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
“The last green jobs czar we had left in disgrace because he expressed comments embracing communism and actually tried to blame the government, the American government, for September 11th attacks,” Scalise said.”
Read More Here:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49781.html#i
xzz1EKHiot7W
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
February 20th, 2011 @ 6:59 am
https://aaron33glover.xanga.com/738333497/cam2cam-%e2%80%93-lass-es-dir-nicht-entgehen/ Thanks for that awesome posting. It saved MUCH time 🙂