I need an interview by Zullo, where he stated that Japanese mafia operated in HI
Posted on | October 26, 2012 | 13 Comments
I need this interview by Zullo, where he talks about Japanese mafia
also, I need help in research of any and all cases of governmental employees of either state or federal government convicted in RICO
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
13 Responses to “I need an interview by Zullo, where he stated that Japanese mafia operated in HI”
Leave a Reply
October 26th, 2012 @ 8:57 am
Good luck on getting an interview from Zero Zullo
October 26th, 2012 @ 9:52 am
RICO Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury
Submitted by PollMan on Fri, 10/26/2012 – 11:23
in
Economy
(edit: below was originally 3 paragraphs so I broke it up a little)
Press Release
Oct. 25, 2012, 2:09 p.m. EDT
Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP’s Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury
NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — Spire Law Group, LLP’s national home owners’ lawsuit, pending in the venue where the “Banksters” control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) – known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers – now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the “Banksters” located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.
In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) – involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver –
Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation):
Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.
In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants.
More:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-of…
Other suits by this firm.
HOMEOWNERS’ $1 BILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST CALIFORNIA AND ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS ALLOWED TO STAND
https://transworldnews.com/1124807/c0/homeowners-1-billion-la…
SPIRE LAW GROUP, LLP’S LANDMARK LAWSUIT ON INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST AND DRUG CARTEL MONEY IN THE NATION’S MORTGAGE SYSTEM, NOW FINDS CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT IN NEWLY ISSUED SENATE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
https://transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=1118730
https://spire-law.com/
October 26th, 2012 @ 11:29 am
I don’t think Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is asking to have an interview with TURNCOAT ZULLO.
I think she is referring to an interview that has already taken place, where TURNCOAT ZULLO says something about the Japanese Mafia.
If that true, and any of you know anything about such an interview get the details of it to Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. ASAP.
October 26th, 2012 @ 12:32 pm
But the posse must be working with you, right? Otherwise, how did you know that Alvin Onaka is a suspect in the investigation?
October 26th, 2012 @ 12:59 pm
The Japanese mafia should send you to sleep with the fishes.
October 26th, 2012 @ 1:31 pm
https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread851136/pg1
October 26th, 2012 @ 1:40 pm
Is Alvin Onaka related to the Yoshihisa Onaka family who runs the Yakuza in Tokyo?
October 26th, 2012 @ 4:24 pm
I saw it on WND a while ago.
October 26th, 2012 @ 4:53 pm
One word… hearsay.
October 27th, 2012 @ 2:33 am
no, evidence obtained in the course of business or official police investigation can be brought on one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule
October 27th, 2012 @ 5:21 am
Yesterday I provided a link to a Trunews interview to address your question and it’s still showing “Awaiting Moderation”. It’s number 2 in this thread.
October 27th, 2012 @ 5:25 am
I got it. I see it, sometimes I keep in moderation, as they are at the top of the page and easy to find. the ones that are approved go to the next page and harder to find
July 22nd, 2013 @ 8:00 pm
Its such as you read my thoughts! You appear to know a lot approximately this, like
you wrote the e-book in it or something. I believe that you simply could do with some
percent to power the message house a little bit, but other
than that, that is great blog. An excellent read.
I will certainly be back.