OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

I did not have the time to compare the original Voeltz complaint and Klayman’s first amended complaint. I am working on the new pleadings. If someone has the summary of both, e-mail it to me, i’ll publish

Posted on | July 2, 2012 | 10 Comments

Terence Brennan
12 approved

It is unfortunate that Voeltz did not present the case himself, as he originally wrote it. It is available (for a fee) on SCRIBD as:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/81520616/Voeltz-Contest-of-Election-pleading-17

In his dismissal order Judge Lewis concludes, in one over-simplified paragraph, that anyone born in the US is qualified to be President. Voeltz, in his original complaint, went into great detail to show why this is not correct. I wish he had been able to argue this himself. He spent several years researching and preparing his arguments. Klayman proceeded in a much different way. And lost.

I think Judge Lewis was way wrong in this part of his order.

But it might not matter much because of the way Presidential elections are structured.

Many voters may think they are voting for a Presidential candidate, but in fact they are voting for unnamed “electors”. The candidate’s name is on the ballot, but votes are not for the candidate but for the “electors”. This scheme is OK when the people involved have honor, but it is a loophole to tyranny when actual candidate is a lying fraud and enemy of the Constitution like Barack Obama. He is exploits and hides behind this protective screen.

I suggest anyone interested should compare Voeltz’s original brief with the one presented by Klayman to the court.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

10 Responses to “I did not have the time to compare the original Voeltz complaint and Klayman’s first amended complaint. I am working on the new pleadings. If someone has the summary of both, e-mail it to me, i’ll publish”

  1. leo derosia
    July 2nd, 2012 @ 11:41 pm

    The game is rigged. These judges will have to stand before the Creator someday

  2. Terence Brennan
    July 3rd, 2012 @ 4:51 am

    To save anyone interested in the Voeltz vs Obama case the expense of subscribing to ScribD, they can download this ZIP file with the following 4 documents:

    (1) Voeltz’s original complaint
    (2) First amended complaint by Atty Klayman
    (3) Second amended complaint by Klayman
    (4) Dismissal by Judge Lewis

    https://hoodieinchief.com/voeltz.zip

    There were many other papers filed, needless to say, but I only included the above four in this ZIP.

  3. Veritas
    July 3rd, 2012 @ 5:50 am

    This from Drudge…Let us PRAY!
    —————

    POLL: In 15 swing states, Romney leads Obama 51% to 43%…

  4. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 3rd, 2012 @ 6:34 am

    it looks good, but it swings right and left every few days

  5. Yephora
    July 3rd, 2012 @ 7:28 am

    Whatever soft support exists for Romney the shocking and dismaying thing is the degree of support the destroyer maintains despite everything.

    I fear this reflects that America’s inhabitants are terminally wicked, and may be so judged.

  6. darren hankins
    July 3rd, 2012 @ 5:00 pm

    Drudge is a conservative lining website

  7. James
    July 4th, 2012 @ 6:31 am

    In the original, Mr. Voeltz pure logic firmly establishes the defination, “natural-born Citizen”. A must read. He also explains the current election process statues and how Florida has usurped the Constitution. Whether, Obama was the Presidential nominee is irrevalent to the complaint other then he is a candidate of recogniztion in the election process. His initial complaint is all that is needed to appeal. Lewis’s opinion is, “without merit”, as he averts the contention irrefutablely presented. Florida’s, “voter’s purge” has fallen short by one public criminal without proper documentation.

  8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    July 4th, 2012 @ 7:22 am

    you canot use the original complaint, as the judge ruled based on the amended Klayman’s complaint.When a party submits a first amended complaint the jusdege throws away the initial complaint, it is being disregarded

  9. Leonard McCauley
    July 4th, 2012 @ 6:29 pm

    I read Judge Klayman dismissed the Case with Prejudice….Has he or a clerk defined
    Prejudice?

  10. MinutemanCDC_SC
    July 5th, 2012 @ 3:40 pm

    Atty. Larry Klayman’s 2nd amended complaint (file 3 of 4) was as clear as the water of Florida’s Weeki Wachee Springs. Even a child could understand it, and only a lawyer could willfully misconstrue it.

    Or a judge. Alice in Wonderland fans will be right at home in Judge Lewis (Carroll)’s dismissal of the case (file 4 of 4). His convoluted logic indicates that he may have intended for his decision to be overruled on appeal. Have a cup of coffee before you attempt to follow his reasoning.

Leave a Reply