OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


How do you create an “umph” or current political layout analysis

Posted on | August 28, 2010 | No Comments

Currently there are 57 Dem Senators, 41 Repubs and 2 Independents.

Independents: Sanders and Liberman typically vote with Dems, so repubs need 9 more seats to tie and 10 more seats to take the Senate.

Keep in mind that only a third of the senate seats are due for re-election -33. About 40% of them are Repubs, so you have only about 20 seats at play and so far the predictions are, that only 7 are likely to be lost by the Dems, not enough to take the senate.

In Congress Dems have 255 seats, Repubs 180. Repubs will need to gain 38 seats for majority. Latest polls are showing them gaining 33-35, not quiet enough to retake the house. Repubs really need an “umph” to put them over the top.   

Now, remember that during Watergate, when Nixon refused to produce the tapes, it became a catalyst, an “umph” that mobilized the anger and resentment in the populace. The same happened with Clinton during the Lewinski affair and his famous “what is is”. Voters hate stonewalling.

Now, going  back to the  issue of elligibility. My latest pleadings created anger. I showed that Judge Lamberth, chief U.S. district judge for the District of Columbia  felt that he had jurisdiction to order the Russian Federation to produuce docs. Who is the respondent for the Russian Federation? President of Russia. If he has jurisdiction to order the pres of Russia to produce docs, why doesn’t he have jurisdiction to order the U.S. pres to   produce his birth certificate and SS application? I showed that I had $20,000 damages, I have standing, I need discovery and production of these docs.

Of course, Lamberth might seat on it and do nothing. On the other hand he might order discovery. If he does, Obama will be in the corner, as there are too many discrepances in his SS, BC and passport records. BO will not be able to BS this one. So, what is the most likely move for him? Stonewalling!!! This stonewalling will be a catalyst for more and more anger. This catalyst can motivate people to vote in this midterm election in close races. It might help   Carly Fiorina in a close CA race against Barbara Boxer, it might help Marco Rubio, who is now trailing Charlie Christ, running as an independent in Fl. A lot of retired Jewish voters, who typically vote for Democrats in FL might vote for Rubio, same might happen in NY in a race against Gilderbrand and in WI against Chuck Feingold.

There are other developments in other courts and other cases, the scenarios are more complicated an more long term, I will not go into those at the moment, I will keep it simple. Will there be an “umph”? Let’s wait and see.   

Please join us today at San Diego Harbor at the Star of India 2-5.

Comments

Leave a Reply